Anonymous wrote:https://blog.emoryadmission.com/2024/11/introducing-oxford-launch-london/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NYU is a very large school with 30,000 undergraduates. It's going to cater to everybody. How many truly urban private colleges that are well regarded are there in the US? It attracts students from all over the world. The biggest issue that some have is that its campus is not like a typical US college.
NYU is a large university that caters to the wealthy, foolish, and feckless. They will let you in then send to China, Berlin, or one of their other outposts to remove your DC from the applicant pool and fudge their numbers even more. Makes the public drool---it is so eliete. The best real campus and college in New York City is Columbia. Not NYU. Like any real university it does not offer an undergraduate degree in business, which is vocational at best. They do not let you in and send you to a first semester in Europe. For all you DP's hoping that DC lands on Wall Street as a quant trader, private equity analyst, or a real shot at IB; NYU undergrad is not the path. Maybe for an MBA, but not undergrad. CMU, Columbia, U of Chicago----physics; even Hamilton, and Colgate are better options.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve learned so much here: NYU, Johns Hopkins, Emory, Boston College, BU, Northeastern, UChicago, Tufts . . . . all terrible.
Found out too late that my DS should have gone to an SEC school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NYU is still primarily a commuter school for Bronx Sci, Sty, and Brooklyn Poly graduates who live with their parents and pay little to no tuition. The school preys on everyone else who can pay the bill while selling them a half-baked college.
What is Brooklyn Poly? It is Brooklyn Tech. Always was. Always will be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the absurdity of the inclusion of Ivies and Stanford, why does NYU list STEM schools like CalTech, MIT, Rice and CMU as peers?
NYU is not a STEM school, less than a quarter of NYU students are STEM.
BU and USC are peer institutions, along with possibly Cal and UCLA (more STEM students but test blind). All are also diverse.
NYU has an up and coming engineering program but agreed that it isn't anywhere near a peer of those schools. But it shouldn't be ignored either.
Stern is fine but not great - Wharton safety (which is not a bad thing). Tisch is top notch.
Anonymous wrote:This person is not an idiot. I worked in College admissions and everyone knows the games or NYU and Northeastern. Look even Emory now has a London program. More will follow.
Anonymous wrote:We have four separate family friends whose children all piled into the NYU/Northeastern trade. Northeastern admitted three of them. Once the deposit check was cashed, about a week later, they received emails that one was being sent to Madrid, and two were being sent to London. At NYU same thing. The deposit check was cashed, and the fourth kid was sent to Shanghai. All families were pissed and trapped.
In admissions, these moved students are not on the roll of public acceptance rates. They don't exist because they are not students at the Boston or New York campus. Just a little game to game the numbers.
Anonymous wrote:So only private universities are the peers?