Anonymous wrote:Brooklyn’s Barack
Stacey Plaskett
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honest question. Do people actually think there are things in the Epstein files that will bring anyone down? If there were, wouldn't the government have already charged them? I have a hard time believing Epstein was in jail but that there is a list of folks who used his services and none of them were charged.
Epstein was convicted of sec trafficking not abuse/rape. So that means there has to be proof that he sold the girls. There must be counterparties (ie people he sold girls to). Those names have to be documented somewhere.
Biden / Garland should have moved the case(s) along faster but they come from the world where a woman’s testimony is not enough (Anita Hill) so I am sure they felt the case(s) was not strong enough.
I think Biden was smart and experienced enough to know that it would have been a waste of time to focus on this case. Trump left a huge mess in his wake, and Biden did a great job of cleaning it up as much as he could in four years. Focusing on this case would have detracted from that, and most importantly, he knew that maga would not be deterred by it. We all knew about the Access Hollywood tapes, Stormy Daniels, rape/SA allegations, disturbing comments about Ivanka, etc. They had already proven that nothing is too low and that Trump is never held accountable. Why spend four years on something that would be shrugged off in a single news cycle?
DP. I disagree. Biden sucks because he moved too slow with everything. Trump came into office this time and basically broke everything in the first 90 days. Biden is a dithering old man whereas Trump is a demented old man.
Biden had no strategy to fix problems. His only solution was to dump money on every problem.
He was not a thinker. He was a believer, like most democrats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honest question. Do people actually think there are things in the Epstein files that will bring anyone down? If there were, wouldn't the government have already charged them? I have a hard time believing Epstein was in jail but that there is a list of folks who used his services and none of them were charged.
Epstein was convicted of sec trafficking not abuse/rape. So that means there has to be proof that he sold the girls. There must be counterparties (ie people he sold girls to). Those names have to be documented somewhere.
Biden / Garland should have moved the case(s) along faster but they come from the world where a woman’s testimony is not enough (Anita Hill) so I am sure they felt the case(s) was not strong enough.
I think Biden was smart and experienced enough to know that it would have been a waste of time to focus on this case. Trump left a huge mess in his wake, and Biden did a great job of cleaning it up as much as he could in four years. Focusing on this case would have detracted from that, and most importantly, he knew that maga would not be deterred by it. We all knew about the Access Hollywood tapes, Stormy Daniels, rape/SA allegations, disturbing comments about Ivanka, etc. They had already proven that nothing is too low and that Trump is never held accountable. Why spend four years on something that would be shrugged off in a single news cycle?
DP. I disagree. Biden sucks because he moved too slow with everything. Trump came into office this time and basically broke everything in the first 90 days. Biden is a dithering old man whereas Trump is a demented old man.
Anonymous wrote:I've said on here before he's taking us all down. He will try to nuke us. He's seriously that unhinged, and now suffering from dementia. We'll see if anyone stops him in his tracks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honest question. Do people actually think there are things in the Epstein files that will bring anyone down? If there were, wouldn't the government have already charged them? I have a hard time believing Epstein was in jail but that there is a list of folks who used his services and none of them were charged.
Epstein was convicted of sec trafficking not abuse/rape. So that means there has to be proof that he sold the girls. There must be counterparties (ie people he sold girls to). Those names have to be documented somewhere.
Biden / Garland should have moved the case(s) along faster but they come from the world where a woman’s testimony is not enough (Anita Hill) so I am sure they felt the case(s) was not strong enough.
I think Biden was smart and experienced enough to know that it would have been a waste of time to focus on this case. Trump left a huge mess in his wake, and Biden did a great job of cleaning it up as much as he could in four years. Focusing on this case would have detracted from that, and most importantly, he knew that maga would not be deterred by it. We all knew about the Access Hollywood tapes, Stormy Daniels, rape/SA allegations, disturbing comments about Ivanka, etc. They had already proven that nothing is too low and that Trump is never held accountable. Why spend four years on something that would be shrugged off in a single news cycle?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one will go down but democrats. The spin on this will rival nothing ever seen. Person held least accountable/responsibe: Trump.
I hope not but this is my guess too.
I often think of that study from years ago that found happiness only increased with money up to 75k a year. I’m sure they’ve updated that with inflation or caveats or whatever, but honestly, I can’t imagine a single one of these filthy rich people are happy. Not a single one. They are just lonely people seeking more and more money/sex/power to make themselves feel something. And the only successful feeling they have figured out is how to feel like they are better than others. It is really insane to watch.
That study was debunked almost immediately after publication. Value of a marginal dollar decreases as total dollars grow, but not to 0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one will go down but democrats. The spin on this will rival nothing ever seen. Person held least accountable/responsibe: Trump.
I hope not but this is my guess too.
I often think of that study from years ago that found happiness only increased with money up to 75k a year. I’m sure they’ve updated that with inflation or caveats or whatever, but honestly, I can’t imagine a single one of these filthy rich people are happy. Not a single one. They are just lonely people seeking more and more money/sex/power to make themselves feel something. And the only successful feeling they have figured out is how to feel like they are better than others. It is really insane to watch.
Yeah, Trump is proof of this. The man has spent his whole life chasing money. I’ve seen no pictures of him, at any time in his life, just having fun doing normal fun things. Golf is the one exception, and he actually looks miserable when he’s golfing too. No pics of him playing with his kids and grandkids, at a beach, visiting cool places just for fun, enjoying nature. The only footage I have seen of him where he looks like he is thoroughly happy and having a good time is the footage of him with Epstein….
Anonymous wrote:I've said on here before he's taking us all down. He will try to nuke us. He's seriously that unhinged, and now suffering from dementia. We'll see if anyone stops him in his tracks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one will go down but democrats. The spin on this will rival nothing ever seen. Person held least accountable/responsibe: Trump.
I hope not but this is my guess too.
I often think of that study from years ago that found happiness only increased with money up to 75k a year. I’m sure they’ve updated that with inflation or caveats or whatever, but honestly, I can’t imagine a single one of these filthy rich people are happy. Not a single one. They are just lonely people seeking more and more money/sex/power to make themselves feel something. And the only successful feeling they have figured out is how to feel like they are better than others. It is really insane to watch.