Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did we go from about 15% obesity in 1970 to what we have now? Anybody care?
Much greater access to fast food and processed food and sedentary lifestyles.
Food supply, Food Supply, Food Supply
+
More discretionary income equals more sedentary lifestyle + better tv + video games. I’m guessing more people in the US today pay others to the lawn/garden work and clean the house than they did in the 1970s.
Anonymous wrote:Why are there no politicians campaigning on free Ozempic for everyone? Literally, 70% of the country is overweight and most people cannot afford to buy GLP-1 weight loss drugs. Ozempic only costs around $5 to produce a month worth of medication. It would cost the US government around 16 billion dollars/year to provide every adult Ozempic. Just make the drug OTC and provide it for free to every adult in the US who can provide their SSN to verify identity. This drug reduces the risk of heart attacks and strokes by almost 20%, likely reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s, lowers risk of cancer and reduces all cause mortality by 10-12%. It makes absolutely no sense that we are not providing it for free to every adult that wants to take it. This policy would save US taxpayers money, while boosting US life expectancy and enhancing quality of life. Any politician who campaigned on free Ozempic would likely win in a landslide and there are many voters that would support the politician solely because they want free weight loss medication.
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile I still have to wonder, do Republicans genuinely think their ideas about healthcare make any sense at all?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because people need access to basic healthcare, and because treatments like this need to be monitored. So carving out this one medication means that those privileged enough to already have healthcare will have access to it, while those who won’t have access to healthcare, let alone consistent healthcare, still won’t have access to this particular class of medications — no matter how wonderful they might be.
I’m much more concerned about universal healthcare access for everyone than I am about this particular carve-out.
My proposal for the carve out is make this medication over the counter and free. The government will ship it to you no questions asked as long as you are 18+ and a legal resident of the US.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did we go from about 15% obesity in 1970 to what we have now? Anybody care?
Much greater access to fast food and processed food and sedentary lifestyles.
Anonymous wrote:Why? Because people need access to basic healthcare, and because treatments like this need to be monitored. So carving out this one medication means that those privileged enough to already have healthcare will have access to it, while those who won’t have access to healthcare, let alone consistent healthcare, still won’t have access to this particular class of medications — no matter how wonderful they might be.
I’m much more concerned about universal healthcare access for everyone than I am about this particular carve-out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did we go from about 15% obesity in 1970 to what we have now? Anybody care?
Much greater access to fast food and processed food and sedentary lifestyles.
Anonymous wrote:How did we go from about 15% obesity in 1970 to what we have now? Anybody care?
Anonymous wrote:How did we go from about 15% obesity in 1970 to what we have now? Anybody care?