Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares about your kids. Who do you think you are, a celebrity?
What if I am? Then what?
Then maybe you’d have good reason. But we both know you’re not a celebrity.
I'm sorry you find the need to hawk your kid's childhood out for validation from strangers. Some of us don't have endless pits of neediness that need to be filled with likes at the expense of out children's privacy.
Lol I see we have yet another shrilling extremist on DCUM. There’s such a thing as a happy medium you know.
Whatever you need to tell yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares about your kids. Who do you think you are, a celebrity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I only allow yearbook but the school and school system post anyway despite me singing a waiver saying no pictures.
We didn’t even allow yearbook in ES but one year they ignored us. We pitched a fit and they ultimately offered to correct “our” YB but they’d already been distributed to everyone else so what was the point. We’re not the “suing” type but we still have not let the school admin forget they screwed up.
We still sign the opt-out (last DC is a senior in HS) and most teachers/clubs sincerely attempt to comply. Current compromise for those who ask for something special is name or image but not both.
And, yes, we have walked away from certain activities, in part, because of their strict demand for permission to publish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares about your kids. Who do you think you are, a celebrity?
People keep photos of their kids off the internet specifically because we know no one else cares about them. Which means other people are sometimes inclined to do very sketchy things with photos of children, because they don't care at all about those kids.
Like this: https://www.fastcompany.com/3036073/the-creepiest-new-corner-of-instagram-role-playing-with-stolen-baby-photos
Or this: https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/06/27/childrens-personal-photos-are-powering-ai-exploitation
And thoughts here: https://www.npr.org/2024/05/20/1251819597/why-you-should-think-twice-before-posting-that-cute-photo-of-your-kid-online
This is not about people being self-centered or thinking others are obsessed with them. It's about protecting kids, their identities, and their data from a lot of entities that have no problem exploiting the images of children for their own gain.
If you have social media set to private settings and only have true “friends” with access to your posts and don’t go crazy you’re fine. And if some school or sports team puts the whole team or activity on line you’re fine too. There’s being careful and reasonable and there’s being paranoid. Hence the happy medium as
I said before.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares about your kids. Who do you think you are, a celebrity?
What if I am? Then what?
Then maybe you’d have good reason. But we both know you’re not a celebrity.
I'm sorry you find the need to hawk your kid's childhood out for validation from strangers. Some of us don't have endless pits of neediness that need to be filled with likes at the expense of out children's privacy.
buttt youre not that important
Anonymous wrote:Do you extend that to signing photo releases of your kids for stuff like school, camps and sports? We have never posted our kids' faces for various reasons but I have always signed the releases for things like this. I'm second guessing this now and wondering how other people handle this.
Anonymous wrote:We’re a no-kids-on-social family. When I get those releases, we don’t sign them, and if there’s an opt out box, we always check it. That being said, I know some orgs aren’t careful about it (ex: my kids have been in group action shot in newsletters, etc) and that doesn’t bother me and I’ve never said anything
If there was a photo on a public website that featured one of my kids, I would ask them to take it down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think I understood the no photos thing a few years ago. It was easier to keep kids away from creeps. But now that people in public are constantly with smart phones and ipads out pointing everywhere, how do you know your child isn't being photographed by creeps in public?
I mean, you don't, but for a parent who is concerned about this, knowing that strangers might be photographing your kid in public is not a reason to just say "screw it, let's give everyone permission to post pics of our kids all over the internet." That doesn't make sense.
Once when I was at a kid's birthday party, there was a dad there I didn't know who made a big production of taking pictures of the birthday girl. It wasn't his daughter, he was a guest, but he made a point of pausing the festivities at one point to take photos of her. My kid was standing behind the birthday girl, with a group of other children, so they were all in the photos. Something about his behavior just sent up a big red flag, so I just quietly walked over to my kid to stand between her and the camera and pretend I had to help where with something or ask a question. The kids at recently been running through the sprinkler and were still in suits, though my DD had put a skirt back on. It still felt super sketch.
I hate feeling like I need to think about that kind of thing but... I think I do. These experiences don't make me LESS vigilant about keeping photos of my kid off the internet, they make me more vigilant.
Again, paranoid. Parents have been taking photos of kids at birthday parties for generations.