Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Solution- more immigration!
Yes! That’s what we need! More uneducated people who are only capable of doing menial tasks, which are of the type that will be replaced by automation first! Great idea!
Truly, do you not see how you're being racist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5541307-ai-automation-job-replacement/amp/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5541307-ai-automation-job-replacement/amp/
What will people do?
Maybe Trump will have ICE round up all the AI "stealing" our jobs?
Isn't it something that it's okay for AI to steal jobs but not okay for "illegals" to "steal" jobs (ones that no one wants).
Relax, it’s a report by Sanders designed to scare
Anonymous wrote:White collar works will need to up-skill and move jobs like blue collared workers did when automation took their jobs. No one has the same job all their lives anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, who's programming all this AI? Code doesn't write itself.
+1
And don't say "AI codes itself". Because then I can say "Code that codes itself doesn't code itself".
There is no Skynet.
Yet. We're probably headed towards Judge Dredd overseeing mega-cities of poor people first.
Anonymous wrote:White-collar work is going to experience what manufacturing already did with outsourcing, and service jobs experienced with immigration. It won't happen overnight but it will be a steady grind with wages stagnating each year, and jobs becoming less and less secure.
You'll probably have to also deal with snarky comments like "learn to code" or being told how hard-working the AI is.
The funniest part is the people that will lose their jobs are the kinds of people that like to repeat the "first they came for..." piece. Now no one is left to care about your jobs, and many may even cheer on your unemployment as you cheered on theirs.
Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5541307-ai-automation-job-replacement/amp/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5541307-ai-automation-job-replacement/amp/
What will people do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, who's programming all this AI? Code doesn't write itself.
+1
And don't say "AI codes itself". Because then I can say "Code that codes itself doesn't code itself".
There is no Skynet.
Yet. We're probably headed towards Judge Dredd overseeing mega-cities of poor people first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know who isn’t worried?
Plumbers
Electricians
Carpenters
Nurses
Doctors
Dentists
Police officers
Landscapers
Construction workers
Teachers
Physical therapists
EMTs
Surgeons
They should be. 100 million less jobs means a hell of a lot more competition for the jobs that still exist, lower wages and benefits because of increased competition, and we will all suffer in a society with a lot more angry and desperate people.
+1 if no one else has a job, who’s going to pay for their services?
Exactly. It's terrifying how little people understand abiut how society works and how tied together our fates really are. You don't eliminate the livelihood of millions of people, and the society as a whole doesn't feel it.
I expect the tech bros will find a way to ensure their services are never, ever impacted. Don't want to pay for their services? Then don't eat.![]()
At that point we are looking at a repeat of the French Revolution, what's there to lose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know who isn’t worried?
Plumbers
Electricians
Carpenters
Nurses
Doctors
Dentists
Police officers
Landscapers
Construction workers
Teachers
Physical therapists
EMTs
Surgeons
They should be. 100 million less jobs means a hell of a lot more competition for the jobs that still exist, lower wages and benefits because of increased competition, and we will all suffer in a society with a lot more angry and desperate people.
+1 if no one else has a job, who’s going to pay for their services?
Exactly. It's terrifying how little people understand abiut how society works and how tied together our fates really are. You don't eliminate the livelihood of millions of people, and the society as a whole doesn't feel it.
I expect the tech bros will find a way to ensure their services are never, ever impacted. Don't want to pay for their services? Then don't eat.![]()
At that point we are looking at a repeat of the French Revolution, what's there to lose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, who's programming all this AI? Code doesn't write itself.
+1
And don't say "AI codes itself". Because then I can say "Code that codes itself doesn't code itself".
There is no Skynet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know who isn’t worried?
Plumbers
Electricians
Carpenters
Nurses
Doctors
Dentists
Police officers
Landscapers
Construction workers
Teachers
Physical therapists
EMTs
Surgeons
They should be. 100 million less jobs means a hell of a lot more competition for the jobs that still exist, lower wages and benefits because of increased competition, and we will all suffer in a society with a lot more angry and desperate people.
+1 if no one else has a job, who’s going to pay for their services?
Exactly. It's terrifying how little people understand abiut how society works and how tied together our fates really are. You don't eliminate the livelihood of millions of people, and the society as a whole doesn't feel it.
I expect the tech bros will find a way to ensure their services are never, ever impacted. Don't want to pay for their services? Then don't eat.![]()