Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree that she’s not necessarily lying, even if these “memories” aren’t real. She may genuinely believe the recovered memories are 100% accurate. However, she only became consciously aware of these alleged events while using a drug that makes people hallucinate. This whole journey started with her hallucinating that this teacher was in the room with her.
“Before taking the MDMA pill, Ms. Griffin told the facilitator, ‘There’s something I can’t face. I know something happened to me, something I’m talking around. But I don’t know what it is.’
Five minutes into the session, she writes in the book, she sat up and said, ‘Why is he here?’
The facilitator asked, ‘Who?’
‘Mr. Mason. From my middle school,’ Ms. Griffin said. (Mr. Mason is the pseudonym she uses for the teacher in the book.)”
Her allegations might be the absolute truth, but they’re based solely on memories that surfaced while she was in an MDMA-induced hallucinogenic state. There is no evidence that independently corroborates any of these memories. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re pure fiction, but that does mean they should be viewed with some skepticism. If this teacher raped a minor repeatedly, he’s getting off incredibly easy…but if he’s totally innocent of these allegations, the poor guy’s life has been turned upside down and there’s no way to clear his name and restore his reputation.
I’m curious why the nyt didn’t interview a psychiatrist or a neurologist or anyone who knows anything about either memory or repressed memories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PS- and that she didn't tell anyone over the years... well, sometimes it's a shameful thing
Again, this may or not apply in this situation, but please let's not perpetuate the narrative that women who didn't tell other people at the time must be lying, or if no other vicitms come forward, the one who has is lying
I'm a PP who expressed discomfort with the whole thing. I absolutely do not want to perpetuate the narrative that women who don't come forward must be lying or anything like that. My discomfort is first and foremost with her lawyer calling another alleged victim a liar when her own story is imperfect. But on top of that, she didn't need to write AND publish AND aggressively promote a book about it to be believed. A book touting a method of memory recovery that she happens to be financially invested in. That's extra. It is, of course, her right to do so. But it leaves me with a lot of uncomfortable questions. Does anyone care what I think? Nope. But a lot of other people seem to have this same discomfort.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that she’s not necessarily lying, even if these “memories” aren’t real. She may genuinely believe the recovered memories are 100% accurate. However, she only became consciously aware of these alleged events while using a drug that makes people hallucinate. This whole journey started with her hallucinating that this teacher was in the room with her.
“Before taking the MDMA pill, Ms. Griffin told the facilitator, ‘There’s something I can’t face. I know something happened to me, something I’m talking around. But I don’t know what it is.’
Five minutes into the session, she writes in the book, she sat up and said, ‘Why is he here?’
The facilitator asked, ‘Who?’
‘Mr. Mason. From my middle school,’ Ms. Griffin said. (Mr. Mason is the pseudonym she uses for the teacher in the book.)”
Her allegations might be the absolute truth, but they’re based solely on memories that surfaced while she was in an MDMA-induced hallucinogenic state. There is no evidence that independently corroborates any of these memories. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re pure fiction, but that does mean they should be viewed with some skepticism. If this teacher raped a minor repeatedly, he’s getting off incredibly easy…but if he’s totally innocent of these allegations, the poor guy’s life has been turned upside down and there’s no way to clear his name and restore his reputation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PS- and that she didn't tell anyone over the years... well, sometimes it's a shameful thing
Again, this may or not apply in this situation, but please let's not perpetuate the narrative that women who didn't tell other people at the time must be lying, or if no other vicitms come forward, the one who has is lying
She’s not saying she didn’t tell bc she was ashamed, she’s saying she didn’t remember things that happened when she was a teenager until suddenly she recalled them with exquisite clarity.
I am a mental health professional and I find this extraordinarily hard to believe. I would actually find it much more believable that she did remember some sexual abuse but was ashamed and is using the mdma experience to begin talking about it. But the story as it is simply doesn’t hold up as accurate. (Again, perfectly willing to believe she was assaulted but what she describes is not how memory works, at all.)
Anonymous wrote:PS- and that she didn't tell anyone over the years... well, sometimes it's a shameful thing
Again, this may or not apply in this situation, but please let's not perpetuate the narrative that women who didn't tell other people at the time must be lying, or if no other vicitms come forward, the one who has is lying
Anonymous wrote:PS- and that she didn't tell anyone over the years... well, sometimes it's a shameful thing
Again, this may or not apply in this situation, but please let's not perpetuate the narrative that women who didn't tell other people at the time must be lying, or if no other vicitms come forward, the one who has is lying
Anonymous wrote:PS- and that she didn't tell anyone over the years... well, sometimes it's a shameful thing
Again, this may or not apply in this situation, but please let's not perpetuate the narrative that women who didn't tell other people at the time must be lying, or if no other vicitms come forward, the one who has is lying