The damage being done on this case pales in comparison to Mar A Lago. Will Mrs Comey's underwear drawer be searched?

Comey is a jackass but the case against him is flawed in so many ways. I’m not sure it will ever get to a jury trial. Same with Bolton when he’s indicated. A big waste of taxpayer money and resources.

Anonymous wrote:Comey indicted.

Obstruction of justice and false statement charges.

No grand juror wanted to deal with an invasive IRS audit for that guy.

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure he'll prevail. However, the aim is probably to bankrupt him in legal fees.

A worthy goal.

Bankrupt? Abbe Lowell will do this for funsies.

I wonder if Comey is regretting announcing the re-opening of the Hillary Clinton case in October 2016.

I'm sure he'll prevail. However, the aim is probably to bankrupt him in legal fees.

A worthy goal.

May he rot a long time in prison

Anonymous wrote:Comey indicted.

Obstruction of justice and false statement charges.

Distraction theatre

Comey indicted.

Obstruction of justice and false statement charges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is only going to tolerate grand juries refusing to return an indictment before he targets those grand jurors individually. He’ll sic the IRS on them, and find all sorts of other ways to harass them.

You say Trump is immune from prosecution but his staff isn’t? You say judges will hold Trump’s people accountable if they do this? No, no they won’t. They are not going to dare intervene because Trump controls their security via the U.S. Marshals Service. Roberts obviously made a deal with Trump after Congress stiffed the Supreme Court police in the Appropriations mark for FY2026. So now Trump is seeking the money the SCOTUS Police needs to take on full security responsibilities for the SCOTUS justices. In exchange, the Roberts Court continues to serve Trump.

Trump is going to raise the cost of opposing him. With the bullets being scrawled with supposedly anti-Trump messages, the next step will be Trump ordering loyalist troops and National Guard forces to open fire on Democrats. He has to shut down opposition before he’s exposed as less than all-powerful, and he’s going to pull out the stops Nightvof Long Knives-style to do so.

Aren't grand juries's identities confidential?

They absolutely are. I was on a federal grand jury many years ago. We got certificates commending us for our service at the end, and when the AUSA gave me mine I said, "and I can't ever show it to anyone, right?" And the court is not subject to Trump's demand for their identities.

Their names aren’t public, but the prosecutors know them

And if the GJ fails to indict, how long will it be before those Antifa radical leftist communist thugs on the GJ are doxxed?

Besides the prosecutors knowing who the grand jurors are, Chief Justice Roberts heads up judicial administration. He can order his designees to arrange that any information Trump wants on the grand jurors be delivered to whomever Trump wishes.

Back in August the House Appropriations Committee came in with their “mark”, the appropriations they recommend for each program. For the first time in memory, the Supreme Court did not get funding for everything it wanted. This even though they sought increased funding for the Supreme Court Police so that SCOTUS would not need to rely at all upon the US Marshals (under Trump) for protective services.

Obviously Roberts wasn’t having that. He has no issue with the US Marshals under Trump providing security for regular judges because it would cost far more to stand up a full judicial security service under judicial control. As a loyal Republican, he isn’t going to seek a huge appropriation when another entity already fulfills the function. But he’s not going to risk his own security. So with Trump agreeing to tell the Republicans in Congress to fund the SCOTUS police, Roberts will stand down on bringing the U.S. Marshals into the Judicial Branch under Roberts’s control.

Anonymous wrote:Yes, most of trumps nominees lied to Congress. Bondi, Patel and more. Indictments coming?

Don’t forget RFK! He did it in multiple hearings.

Yes, most of trumps nominees lied to Congress. Bondi, Patel and more. Indictments coming?

If he gets tried for perjury, Pam Bondi needs to be tried for perjury since she said told Congress wouldn’t weaponize the DOJ. After that every cabinet member needs to be tried for perjury. Then Brett Kavanaugh. Only then will justice be served.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

The right is celebrating political oppression.

The left is lamenting political oppression.

The left detests Comey, for what he did to Hillary Clinton. Unlike you, but like Rogan, Cruz and other non-leftists who decried Kimmel's temporary cancellation, we do understand what this is about. It's about this White House's attempts to become a dictatorship and suppress any dissent or independent thought.

You should clarify this in your mind.

Here is the thing: this is the tit for tat for all that lawfare committed against Trump. (Many people, not just maga, see the lawsuits against him as lawfare)

If someone strongly believes that lawfare is wrong, they should not condone it even in a tit-for-tat situation.

Strongly disagree. Tit for tat response to lawfare isnt just acceptable, it's politically *obligated*. Trump was right in that tweet that people are wondering why he hasn't done it; you cannot have the dems do this while they are in office and then not retaliate out of principle. You have to retaliate so that there is a sense of mutually assured destruction. Otherwise the left will just pick off the right with prosecutions (and assassinations- we need to see some of these assassins publicly executed after a fair trial).

I hope you're a troll.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is doing it to spite you. Other people have entire lives and worlds that have nothing to do with you.

I never thought you were doing it to spite anyone. Your statements are so deranged that I truly hope you are purposefully looking to joke around, and don't actually believe what you write.

I am friends with a lot of people with opposing views from mine. My own family runs the gamut from communist to very conservative. But none of them are punitive like you. They never advocate for retribution. That is the opposite of what we need to function in society. We need to learn to disagree and still get along, which means not purposefully making others suffer for the heck of it.

Shame on you.

MAGA do not live in reality. The do not distinguish between fairy tale self-delusion and cynical lying. It's all the same to them. It's just a worldview: only winning matters, not what it won it lost.