Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is speculation that MD cutoff is at
226. If true, that would be absolutely insane.
who is speculating and where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is speculation that MD cutoff is at
226. If true, that would be absolutely insane.
K
who is speculating and where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is speculation that MD cutoff is at
226. If true, that would be absolutely insane.
who is speculating and where?
Anonymous wrote:There is speculation that MD cutoff is at
226. If true, that would be absolutely insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the parent of the 222 kid above. It sucks, but in the end, NMSQT is not all that important, especially since my kid is not interested in any of the schools that provide scholarships to NM scholars. Moving on...
They will be Commended. Congratulations to your kid!
Anonymous wrote:There is speculation that MD cutoff is at
226. If true, that would be absolutely insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a NMF back in the early 90’s, when it might have meant more for college admissions. I’ve done ok, typical law career trajectory- but many in my high school class who didn’t get National Merit recognition went on to achieve more academically and professionally. My point is, it really didn’t matter back then and probably matters even less now.
Same. 80s.
Also, it appears the scholarship values have not kept up with inflation! The main one is less than 3K per year.
And last year the non-profit that runs it started hitting up former winners for donations. I've gotten two mailings already after zero contact since 1987.
Anonymous wrote:There is speculation that MD cutoff is at
226. If true, that would be absolutely insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally think having different cutoffs for different states is bogus. Why should one kid be a NMSF with a 212 while a kid with a 222 in another state is not?
Because some states/school districts have a lot more resources. I personally think the current approach is fair.
Last year, students from Title 1 schools in Massachusetts had to score 222 to be semifinalists, and private school students in the wealthiest Mississippi enclaves only had to score 209.
My kid in public school in NJ got a 219 and won't qualify for SF, but if she instead had gone to the private high school in TN that I attended, she would have. How is that right?
Anonymous wrote:I was a NMF back in the early 90’s, when it might have meant more for college admissions. I’ve done ok, typical law career trajectory- but many in my high school class who didn’t get National Merit recognition went on to achieve more academically and professionally. My point is, it really didn’t matter back then and probably matters even less now.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the parent of the 222 kid above. It sucks, but in the end, NMSQT is not all that important, especially since my kid is not interested in any of the schools that provide scholarships to NM scholars. Moving on...
Anonymous wrote:I'm the parent of the 222 kid above. It sucks, but in the end, NMSQT is not all that important, especially since my kid is not interested in any of the schools that provide scholarships to NM scholars. Moving on...