Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's better to incarcerate more and have a safe community than few and an unsafe
Actually the U.S justice system is established on the premise that it is far better to let 10 guilty people go free than to unjustly incarcerate one innocent person. But maybe you aren't familiar with the United States.
The US Justice system wasn't meant to be a revolving door.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's better to incarcerate more and have a safe community than few and an unsafe
Actually the U.S justice system is established on the premise that it is far better to let 10 guilty people go free than to unjustly incarcerate one innocent person. But maybe you aren't familiar with the United States.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's better to incarcerate more and have a safe community than few and an unsafe
Actually the U.S justice system is established on the premise that it is far better to let 10 guilty people go free than to unjustly incarcerate one innocent person. But maybe you aren't familiar with the United States.
Anonymous wrote:It's better to incarcerate more and have a safe community than few and an unsafe
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If feds really want to reduce violent crime in DC (which I know they don't), one of their first steps should be support local law enforcement targeting the small number of individuals who have ties to the majority of violent crimes. This research in 2022 shows that about 500 people are causing 70 percent of violent crimes in the city. And of those 700, 200 are the worst offenders.
A Majority Of D.C. Killings Are Driven By Small Number Of People | WAMU https://share.google/AKRYHTJLhTJF61CGD
If we know (or WAMU knows) just 500 young men are responsible for the overwhelming majority of DC crime, it begs the obvious question:
- why are these 500 repeat offenders not in prison?
A complete failure of D.C. laws, regulations, and restrictions on police, is the only answer I can come up with.
Agree or disagree?