Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
This. Parents can be so unreasonable. With young students, she should have put her soda out of reach of the kids. No excuse for kicking a kid. Although I’m guessing she put her leg out to stop the kid and kicked him accidentally but even that is inexcusable. You need to stop kid with your hands not with your feet
This was an elementary school classroom. Soda was probably prohibited in the cafeteria, much less the classrooms themselves. Having soda out in class was obviously going to be a trigger for behaviors.
This was terrible judgement on the paraeducator's part. The kick (which I also suspect was more of a blocking move rather than a kick) was a split-second decision. Yes, an awful mistake, but I'm more inclined to be forgiving of the split-second mistake here than the conscious decision to introduce an unnecessary trigger into the classroom.
Anonymous wrote:This is an MCPS training issue. Clearly their staff haven’t been trained on crisis intervention.
Anonymous wrote:This is an MCPS training issue. Clearly their staff haven’t been trained on crisis intervention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
This. Parents can be so unreasonable. With young students, she should have put her soda out of reach of the kids. No excuse for kicking a kid. Although I’m guessing she put her leg out to stop the kid and kicked him accidentally but even that is inexcusable. You need to stop kid with your hands not with your feet
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
No, it really isn't. Even if there isn't an explicit rule against it, it demonstrates terrible judgment. Like teachers having cell phones out in class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
And alcohol.
Students can have the same and eat a full meal in class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
This. Parents can be so unreasonable. With young students, she should have put her soda out of reach of the kids. No excuse for kicking a kid. Although I’m guessing she put her leg out to stop the kid and kicked him accidentally but even that is inexcusable. You need to stop kid with your hands not with your feet
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
DP. Soda isn’t poison.
Unfortunately, paras are regularly denied their contractual breaks during the day. Her problem was drinking and eating unhealthy snacks in the same room
As kids. It’s kicking a child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
No, it really isn't. Even if there isn't an explicit rule against it, it demonstrates terrible judgment. Like teachers having cell phones out in class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.