Anonymous
07/30/2025 09:28
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Classic, it’s all about control with these Libs, they get off on it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Red Wolves was right there and Snyder picked a stupid, corporate name that makes it sound like a defense contractor bought the rights to the team.
Imagine a cold November night, 3rd and 12 for the Eagles and howling noises are being pumped through the stadium and the crowd is going nuts. Some crazy super fan is shown on TV going crazy in a full on wolf pelt, little kids in the crowd have wolf stuffed animals.
But no, we have a name that reminds you only of that stupid Fox Sports robot or one of those Marines commercials from the 90’s.
White liberal sports columnists (eg, Mike Wise) were the ones offended.
Anonymous
07/30/2025 08:34
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Anonymous wrote:Red Wolves was right there and Snyder picked a stupid, corporate name that makes it sound like a defense contractor bought the rights to the team.
Imagine a cold November night, 3rd and 12 for the Eagles and howling noises are being pumped through the stadium and the crowd is going nuts. Some crazy super fan is shown on TV going crazy in a full on wolf pelt, little kids in the crowd have wolf stuffed animals.
But no, we have a name that reminds you only of that stupid Fox Sports robot or one of those Marines commercials from the 90’s.
White liberal sports columnists (eg, Mike Wise) were the ones offended.
Anonymous
07/30/2025 08:32
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Anonymous wrote:Red Wolves was right there and Snyder picked a stupid, corporate name that makes it sound like a defense contractor bought the rights to the team.
Imagine a cold November night, 3rd and 12 for the Eagles and howling noises are being pumped through the stadium and the crowd is going nuts. Some crazy super fan is shown on TV going crazy in a full on wolf pelt, little kids in the crowd have wolf stuffed animals.
But no, we have a name that reminds you only of that stupid Fox Sports robot or one of those Marines commercials from the 90’s.
No compromise. The only true name is Redskins.
Anonymous
07/30/2025 07:37
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Red Wolves was right there and Snyder picked a stupid, corporate name that makes it sound like a defense contractor bought the rights to the team.
Imagine a cold November night, 3rd and 12 for the Eagles and howling noises are being pumped through the stadium and the crowd is going nuts. Some crazy super fan is shown on TV going crazy in a full on wolf pelt, little kids in the crowd have wolf stuffed animals.
But no, we have a name that reminds you only of that stupid Fox Sports robot or one of those Marines commercials from the 90’s.
Imagine a cold November night, 3rd and 12 for the Eagles and howling noises are being pumped through the stadium and the crowd is going nuts. Some crazy super fan is shown on TV going crazy in a full on wolf pelt, little kids in the crowd have wolf stuffed animals.
But no, we have a name that reminds you only of that stupid Fox Sports robot or one of those Marines commercials from the 90’s.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 22:46
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Anonymous wrote:Let’s poll Native Americans. If a majority are fine with it then the pale face liberals can slink away.
My in-laws and husband are all members of a small Native American tribe in Oklahoma. They've had no complaints with the name and, if anything, took some pride in it. My husband was a Redskins fan. Most Native Americans either like or are neutral on the name.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 22:08
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Vote to bring Redskins back asap.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:35
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Commanders is a very lame name. It just screams cynical, corporate douchebags. It's a Snyder name, the worst owner in the history of football.
Redskins is good. It has an edge. There's a lot of history. If I recall, polling showed that the vast majority of Native Americans are cool with the name.
I think the team should embrace their legacy and go forth. From a money and branding point of view, Redskins are ka-ching.
Redskins is good. It has an edge. There's a lot of history. If I recall, polling showed that the vast majority of Native Americans are cool with the name.
I think the team should embrace their legacy and go forth. From a money and branding point of view, Redskins are ka-ching.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:35
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Agreed, Snyder stain needs to go. HTTR !Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Naw - left hand up, who are we??! The commanders
You embrace Dan Snyder’s name. I’ll stick with the one the American Indians prefer.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:32
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Anonymous wrote:They’ve been playing much better as the Commanders and finally have a bright future under new leadership. Let it ride!!!
The good play has far more to do with competent ownership than the stupid new name.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:31
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Anonymous wrote:They’ve been playing much better as the Commanders and finally have a bright future under new leadership. Let it ride!!!
Yeah, I’ll go with the name that played in 5 Super Bowls and won 3 and it’s not the C-Word.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:29
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
They’ve been playing much better as the Commanders and finally have a bright future under new leadership. Let it ride!!!
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:23
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Another vote for bringing the Redskins back.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 21:04
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Anonymous wrote:Naw - left hand up, who are we??! The commanders
You embrace Dan Snyder’s name. I’ll stick with the one the American Indians prefer.
Anonymous
07/29/2025 20:17
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Redskins and Bullets
Enough with the woke misery
Enough with the woke misery
Anonymous
07/29/2025 20:16
Subject: Commanders or Redskins?
Naw - left hand up, who are we??! The commanders