Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LACs are not backup schools for state schools and state schools are not backup schools for LACs. They are on opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of colleges—students often have a preference towards one type.
LACs attract students looking for more intimate settings with smaller class sizes and more opportunities to get to know professors.
LAC students are much more likely to be seeking a broader education and state school students may be more interested in specialization. Moreover, state school students are much more concerned about career focused education than LAC students (which is why state schools will have popular majors such as nursing, education, and engineering while LACs will have popular majors such as mathematics, english, economics, and biology.
They also tend to value smaller communities and are more comfortable somewhere where they see lots of familiar faces. This contrasts the large state school where you see tens of thousands of different people.
Overall, they can be great colleges for a student seeking a tight knit, intellectual atmosphere.
Oh my goodness, what a load. Do you work in public relations, by chance?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would a college not prepare you work working afterwards? Then what is the point?
Every day at my job I research things and write up summaries of them for other people, sometimes present them orally. Those are core job skills I learned at a liberal arts institution. I've worked in finance and tech. Same skills are core to law practice as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who attends a small liberal arts college or liberal arts college these days? Is it a back-up school if student can't get into state public flagship? Does each state have a well known liberal arts college, or are LACs mostly in the northeast region of US, along east coast US and east-midwest US?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/120/1284381.page
Intellectually curious kids with interdisciplinary interests and less certain of committing to a major. Those who like the intimacy and personal touch of small undergrad only colleges and classes vs the anonymity and impersonality of large universities. Those who prefer collaborative versus competitive environments. This is not a value judgement of one being better than the other. They are just different environments.
Anonymous wrote:Why would a college not prepare you work working afterwards? Then what is the point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The S in SLAC stands for “selective”, not small liberal arts colleges.
My whole life SLAC meant small liberal arts college. Then I came to DCUM.
How old are you? (Or rather, how limited is your worldview?)
"Selective Liberal Arts Colleges: Higher Quality as Well as Higher Prestige"
The Journal of Higher Education, 1985
"The Distinctive Scholarship of the Selective Liberal Arts College"
The Journal of Higher Education, 1987
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The S in SLAC stands for “selective”, not small liberal arts colleges.
My whole life SLAC meant small liberal arts college. Then I came to DCUM.
How old are you? (Or rather, how limited is your worldview?)
"Selective Liberal Arts Colleges: Higher Quality as Well as Higher Prestige"
The Journal of Higher Education, 1985
"The Distinctive Scholarship of the Selective Liberal Arts College"
The Journal of Higher Education, 1987
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The S in SLAC stands for “selective”, not small liberal arts colleges.
My whole life SLAC meant small liberal arts college. Then I came to DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In MD, the other state universities other than UMCP aren't great so a LAC it is.
Which LACs? Washington college, Goucher, where are the LACs in MD? In VA?
Loyola
Loyola is not a liberal arts college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LACs and SLACs can be appealing for lots of students. However... outside of Williams, Amherst, and maybe Pomona and Swarthmore, every non-recruited athlete straight male is thinking - is there a place for me here? And often the answer is no.
These are tiny schools. And the vibe is generally very rejective of straight non-athlete males. And for 17 year old boys that is a very big deal. LACS/SLACS aren't getting these guys anymore. It's a problem.
Utter nonsense.
NP. I don't think it is nonsense. I'm looking at my kid's WASP class list and a huge percentage (seems like at least 70%) of the boys, in particular, are athletes. SO MANY. Not sure how my NARP boy will feel socially, but my guess is he'll find his nice, nerdy little tribe. We'll see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LACs and SLACs can be appealing for lots of students. However... outside of Williams, Amherst, and maybe Pomona and Swarthmore, every non-recruited athlete straight male is thinking - is there a place for me here? And often the answer is no.
These are tiny schools. And the vibe is generally very rejective of straight non-athlete males. And for 17 year old boys that is a very big deal. LACS/SLACS aren't getting these guys anymore. It's a problem.
Utter nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:only worth it if you can get a winning lottery ticket to the top 2 or 3 - after that a hard pass