Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have noticed many parents we know who are superstars in their fields have average/below average children. The kids are not motivated.
I wonder if they were born less intelligent or it is their upbringing.
We just spent the weekend with a family whose parents are some of the most intelligent kind people we know. Their kids are an absolute disaster in every way possible.
Stupid people can't understand smart people.
OP saw one person and built a whole stereotype around it. No ability to explain her "idea" in any but the vaguest terms. Main reaction to seeing someone successful is to think of an insult.
Classic stupid person behavior.
Anonymous wrote:I have noticed many parents we know who are superstars in their fields have average/below average children. The kids are not motivated.
I wonder if they were born less intelligent or it is their upbringing.
We just spent the weekend with a family whose parents are some of the most intelligent kind people we know. Their kids are an absolute disaster in every way possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Usually the parents spend more time on their careers than with the children.
+1
Successful parenting is a job in itself, if both parents have demanding careers it’s very hard to parent well.
I agree. Parents only have so much time in a day and some children are more challenging personality-wise, motivation-wise, or are neurotypical in a non-obvious way (ADD, OCD, autism) and managing that child or those children and subsequent more challenging sibling dynamics will take a lot of parental resources and may lead to more permissiveness. We know a very high powered, wealthy (both family $ and earned $), accomplished (Ivy and T-20 degrees, MD at hedge fund and partner at a top law firm; family $ may have influenced one trajectory a bit but a lot of hard work, talent, and ambition was required in both cases) couple who will have their fourth child in seven years soon. They have multiple live in nannies and neither of them ever manages more than two children at once. Their children will have a ton of resources and will have received a ton of caregiving, but a lot that will not be from the actual parents.
The oldest child now in 1st wouldn’t talk in many social situations in preschool (seemed like selective mutism) and I witnessed that child last year hurt multiple children on the playground (stepped on at least three kids’ hands and pushed a child off a play structure) during a 30-minute period when I was volunteering.
Who knows what the outcomes will be? I think the stereotype of the uber successful but distant parent is changing a bit though. I think there are a lot of parents who strive for both, but is providing a resource rich environment for a child and not being physically present a ton the same as being physically present? Is it better? Is it worse? Is it parent and caregiver dependent?
Anonymous wrote:I have noticed many parents we know who are superstars in their fields have average/below average children. The kids are not motivated.
I wonder if they were born less intelligent or it is their upbringing.
We just spent the weekend with a family whose parents are some of the most intelligent kind people we know. Their kids are an absolute disaster in every way possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The richer the family, the more likely the kids are on screens too much and on social media which sucks the life, intelligence, creativity right out of you. The rich families at our school have dedicated ipads for each kid and at age 10 they get a smartphone. I think it's kind of disgusting.
This isn't true. Statistically lower parental income and education levels correlate with more screen time usage by kids.
https://www.the74million.org/children-from-low-income-less-educated-families-spend-nearly-twice-as-much-time-on-screens/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107378/
And higher incomes correlate with higher intelligence and better outcomes. People don't want to know how much of life is tied up in the DNA you give your kids. As for successful people with unsuccessful kids, I wonder if some people just don't match well. For instance, I've long thought having a "spark" was nature's way of telling you that the other person is a good match. Well, the opposite could also be true.
Anonymous wrote:Regression to the mean is possible.
Also, some of my kids appeared to be a real mess at age 8 or even 14 but were absolutely killing it academically and socially by age 18.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have noticed many parents we know who are superstars in their fields have average/below average children. The kids are not motivated.
I wonder if they were born less intelligent or it is their upbringing.
We just spent the weekend with a family whose parents are some of the most intelligent kind people we know. Their kids are an absolute disaster in every way possible.
Oh come on. Hard to believe this is not a huge exaggeration. How old are their kids?
Fighting, screaming, whining, hitting, complaining, being disrespectful 75% of the time. The parents just tune out. It is like they just accepted this poor behavior and don’t know what to do with the children.
I’m surprised how such competent people can be such horrible parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Usually the parents spend more time on their careers than with the children.
+1
Successful parenting is a job in itself, if both parents have demanding careers it’s very hard to parent well.
Anonymous wrote:My husband and I are both extremely anxious overachievers from fairly dysfunctional homes. Our kids have so much anxiety (likely inherited) that it makes it difficult for them to handle life’s stressors. They have struggled socially, academically etc.
I wonder if they would have done better if both my husband and I had sought help for our anxiety earlier. It’s hard to conceptualize of a whole family though where everyone is on antidepressants, Zoloft etc. Sometimes we think of ourselves as kind of a generic cocktail that probably shouldn’t have been mixed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The initial post talks about intelligence a lot, but then the follow up talks about behavior.
Those 2 things have little to do with one another.
+1, and also this whole thread is really about one interaction with one family, from which OP is making all kinds of leaps. Just say "I am disappointed my nice friends have bratty kids."
I have known the family for a decade. It is not one interaction. Our kids go to the same school.
I was appalled at their poor behavior. However, they are also low performers at school. They quit all their sports. They hate their instruments.
Assuming this is elementary…How do you know who is a “low performer” at school? And based upon what criteria exactly? A lot of kids don’t enjoy organized sports or just try out different rec sports at this age (and perhaps don’t return the next season). A lot of kids think practicing instrument is a drag and only do it because their parents make them (raising my own hand on this one…ended up playing in the HS band and enjoying it very much).