Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.
Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.
Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o
So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.
Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.
Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.
Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o
So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.
Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.
Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.
Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o
So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Ever hear of Ukraine?
I wasn’t aware that there were so many Americans fighting foreign wars, I think this is despicable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Ever hear of Ukraine?
Everyone I know who went o Ukraine to fight were veterans of the US military. Basically they wore the American uniform first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Ever hear of Ukraine?
Everyone I know who went o Ukraine to fight were veterans of the US military. Basically they wore the American uniform first.
Yes I think those defending foreign nations should have the cojones to serve the US first and foremost. Just move to the country you’re more loyal to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Ever hear of Ukraine?
Everyone I know who went o Ukraine to fight were veterans of the US military. Basically they wore the American uniform first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Ever hear of Ukraine?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Ever hear of Ukraine?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
I don’t know anyone doing this though other than Israel. Do you? Do you know any Americans fighting for a foreign country other than Israel? Have you ever known anyone to do this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Hamas still holding American citizens hostage in Gaza?
No. The last American, Edan Alexander, was released two months ago. Alexander is a dual citizen who is from New Jersey who went to Israel after highschool, joined the IDF, and was on active duty at an Israeli military base on Oct. 7.
So he fought in the Israeli military, but not the US military. Israel first.
Yes, so?
DP.
So he's a shitty American? I genuinely don't understand how someone can have citizenship, but also serve in a foreign military.
It' snot uncommon. Many countries have mandatory conscription for their citizens, if you have their passport, you serve. Others can volunteer. So what?
Under some circumstances, you could lose your US citizenship by serving in a foreign army. If the US, for example, puts Israel on the naughty list, serving in the IDF could be deemed treasonous. Ditto if you served in the Hamas “army” which doesn’t officially exist. They can deny it exists because they don’t wear uniforms.
Serving in the IDF is fine for dual citizens, as is serving in the Swiss, South Korean, Austrian Danish, Swedish, and other militaries, whose countries obligate their citizens, dual and otherwise, to serve. Serving in the militaries of nations hostile to the U.S. might indeed be another story, but it's not an issue for service with friendly nations like Israel, Switzerland, etc.
Anonymous wrote:According to the American politicians on Israel's payroll, Israeli citizens are worth more than American citizens.
We have Americans losing healthcare but they send BILLIONS to Israel (a country with universal healthcare) Let them pay for their own genocide!