Anonymous wrote:All we are seeing is little brother catching up to big brother. I knew it was only a matter of time. The best manuevers of the system by far are Arabs and Jews. I've never seen better negotiators and deal finders

Mazel tov/mabrook, this comment manages to be offensive to people on all sides of the Middle East debate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.

What civil rights laws violations have they gotten away with? Be specific.

Go read the letters yourself. The specific instances of civil rights violations are described. If Harvard and Columbia think they are being falsely accused, they should defend themselves in court. But I don't know how they think they can get away with race-based admissions standards, and sending an email (written evidence, omg) to Jewish students that they won't be able to protect them from hate crimes on campus. You can't get away with this behavior in America.

It seems Harvard and Columbia have given Jewish students preferential admission. Both schools have about 25% Jewish students in undergrad while the Jewish population in the US is 2%. Now you are saying that these same “people” in the administration(who are Jewish) are in a conspiracy to do what?

Let’s remember just because some outside group claims a peaceful protest is a hate crime does not make it so. Protesting against the Israel’s on going Holocaust and war crimes is not a hate crime.

Now you and the Trump administration are stripping Jews who attend these two school of their degrees …so as to protect Jews from peaceful protest against Israel? It is you who are antisemitic and involved in hate crimes.

You have gone too far.

These colleges are the ones that introduced geographic diversity in admissions to keep down the number of Jews.

Sure, but that was generations ago. When I went to Penn (which was also decades ago), more than half of the white undergraduates were Jews (including me). Whatever claims people want to make now about antisemitism in the Ivy League, most of which I find pretty unpersuasive, it seems like a real stretch to say it's related to or caused by the antisemitic attitudes of the 1950s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.

What civil rights laws violations have they gotten away with? Be specific.

Go read the letters yourself. The specific instances of civil rights violations are described. If Harvard and Columbia think they are being falsely accused, they should defend themselves in court. But I don't know how they think they can get away with race-based admissions standards, and sending an email (written evidence, omg) to Jewish students that they won't be able to protect them from hate crimes on campus. You can't get away with this behavior in America.

It seems Harvard and Columbia have given Jewish students preferential admission. Both schools have about 25% Jewish students in undergrad while the Jewish population in the US is 2%. Now you are saying that these same “people” in the administration(who are Jewish) are in a conspiracy to do what?

Let’s remember just because some outside group claims a peaceful protest is a hate crime does not make it so. Protesting against the Israel’s on going Holocaust and war crimes is not a hate crime.

Now you and the Trump administration are stripping Jews who attend these two school of their degrees …so as to protect Jews from peaceful protest against Israel? It is you who are antisemitic and involved in hate crimes.

You have gone too far.

Wow...your idea of "peaceful" is off the charts. Those protests were not peaceful.

You can’t even prevail on that argument. The worst violence that occurred on any college campus over these past two years, by a mile, was committed by Zionist terrorists who violently attacked the UCLA encampment last April.

How did you not know that?

That doesn't negate the violence that the Columbia protestors displayed with just one example being their takeover of the library.

Serious question: I get that the protesters were disruptive, but at what point were they violent? If it was only in resisting arrest — which involved police intervening in a peaceful protest, then I wouldn’t see that as “violence …displayed” by protesters. NP So I may be another person whose idea of “peaceful “ disagrees with yours.

They absolutely destroyed many places on campus. Just google Columbia destruction by protestors. DD was sending me photos of various areas on campus that were smashed/destroyed by the protestors and it was shocking.

They also took people hostage one or two times.

Peaceful protesting is fine. Smashing up and destroying campus and taking hostages is not fine nor is it peaceful. DD came home when they canceled classes because we are Jewish and she did not want to risk being on campus during Passover.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.

What civil rights laws violations have they gotten away with? Be specific.

Go read the letters yourself. The specific instances of civil rights violations are described. If Harvard and Columbia think they are being falsely accused, they should defend themselves in court. But I don't know how they think they can get away with race-based admissions standards, and sending an email (written evidence, omg) to Jewish students that they won't be able to protect them from hate crimes on campus. You can't get away with this behavior in America.

It seems Harvard and Columbia have given Jewish students preferential admission. Both schools have about 25% Jewish students in undergrad while the Jewish population in the US is 2%. Now you are saying that these same “people” in the administration(who are Jewish) are in a conspiracy to do what?

Let’s remember just because some outside group claims a peaceful protest is a hate crime does not make it so. Protesting against the Israel’s on going Holocaust and war crimes is not a hate crime.

Now you and the Trump administration are stripping Jews who attend these two school of their degrees …so as to protect Jews from peaceful protest against Israel? It is you who are antisemitic and involved in hate crimes.

You have gone too far.

Wow...your idea of "peaceful" is off the charts. Those protests were not peaceful.

You can’t even prevail on that argument. The worst violence that occurred on any college campus over these past two years, by a mile, was committed by Zionist terrorists who violently attacked the UCLA encampment last April.

How did you not know that?

That doesn't negate the violence that the Columbia protestors displayed with just one example being their takeover of the library.

Serious question: I get that the protesters were disruptive, but at what point were they violent? If it was only in resisting arrest — which involved police intervening in a peaceful protest, then I wouldn’t see that as “violence …displayed” by protesters. NP So I may be another person whose idea of “peaceful “ disagrees with yours.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McMahon lol. The one who repeatedly referred to AI as A1 in a state of education interview. Not once, not twice. The entire interview.

And she covered up the WWE child sex crimes.

I feel the heat of a thousand fingers tapping their keyboards at Columbia. Can’t wait for the student Op Eds.

oooh so scary. What is that gonna do?

Get them picked up by former Jan sixers parading as ICE.

All we are seeing is little brother catching up to big brother. I knew it was only a matter of time. The best manuevers of the system by far are Arabs and Jews. I've never seen better negotiators and deal finders

There are even some who claim Latino on college applications if their family lived in Latin America before immigrating here.

Columbia should have thought through their capitulation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DoEd doesn’t accredit universities

It approves the accreditors.

It recognizes the accreditors, you think they're going to remove the entire commission from it's list of recognized accreditation entities?

On second thought. . . who knows?

Which is why my lifelong republican SIL said she couldn't vote for Trump because "who knows what he'll do?"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McMahon lol. The one who repeatedly referred to AI as A1 in a state of education interview. Not once, not twice. The entire interview.

And she covered up the WWE child sex crimes.

I feel the heat of a thousand fingers tapping their keyboards at Columbia. Can’t wait for the student Op Eds.

oooh so scary. What is that gonna do?

Just in time for Linda’s August 31, 2025 lawsuit decision. The lawsuit was conveniently paused so Trump could provide a safe haven for the pedophile enabler. The Maryland Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of the Maryland Child Victims Act.

McMahon is the one who should be eliminated! “Children are the future.” We’ll be including “A One” in classrooms. She said A1 repeatedly during a panel at the tech and education ASU+GSV Summit on April 8, 2025.

Imagine appointing a woman as the U.S. Secretary of Education who is not only dangerously stupid, but covered up sexual assaults of minors. Her husband paid settlements to suppress allegations. This hag is responsible for the safety of our children.

Trump loves sexual predators, drug addicts, and alcoholics!

Linda and Vince McMahon and the WWE knew about and did not stop the sexual abuse of adolescent ring boys by ringside announcer Melvin Phillips Jr.

Melvin was fired, but Linda and Vince rehired him six weeks later on the condition that he stay away from children. Melvin the molester did not stay away from children! He’s dead now.

A civil lawsuit was filed in October (2024) in Maryland on behalf of five men. These men, identified as John Does, were teenagers who worked as ring boys for the WWE during the 1980s and 1990s. The lawsuit alleges they were sexually abused by a male WWE employee, and that Linda McMahon and her husband, Vince McMahon, were aware of the abuse but did not intervene. The lawsuit claims that Linda McMahon was in the thick of it and a leader in trying to conceal the abuse. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/whats-in-the-lawsuit-that-alleges-linda-mcmahon-failed-to-protect-children/2024/12#:~:text=The%20suit%20alleges%20that%20Linda,and%20life%2Daltering%20abuse.%E2%80%9D

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.

What civil rights laws violations have they gotten away with? Be specific.

Go read the letters yourself. The specific instances of civil rights violations are described. If Harvard and Columbia think they are being falsely accused, they should defend themselves in court. But I don't know how they think they can get away with race-based admissions standards, and sending an email (written evidence, omg) to Jewish students that they won't be able to protect them from hate crimes on campus. You can't get away with this behavior in America.

It seems Harvard and Columbia have given Jewish students preferential admission. Both schools have about 25% Jewish students in undergrad while the Jewish population in the US is 2%. Now you are saying that these same “people” in the administration(who are Jewish) are in a conspiracy to do what?

Let’s remember just because some outside group claims a peaceful protest is a hate crime does not make it so. Protesting against the Israel’s on going Holocaust and war crimes is not a hate crime.

Now you and the Trump administration are stripping Jews who attend these two school of their degrees …so as to protect Jews from peaceful protest against Israel? It is you who are antisemitic and involved in hate crimes.

You have gone too far.

Wow...your idea of "peaceful" is off the charts. Those protests were not peaceful.

Did someone die?

Someone has to die for a protest to be considered not peaceful?

Anonymous wrote:Complain that we are eliminating the DoE. Complain that the DoE is doing its job.

See this kind of gaslighting and manipulation only works on MAGA. You all said DOE is a waste but now that dump is using it as revenge and evil you all are happy and claim they are doing their job. Wow that is some mental gymnastics. And who are "we"???? DOGE is this you lol

Complain that we are eliminating the DoE. Complain that the DoE is doing its job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go woke, go broke.

So, you're okay with the next Democratic adminstration yanking Liberty University's accreditation, right?

EXACTLY!!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is really getting a lot out of that deal it made with Trump. Lesson for everyone else: don’t make deals with Trump! He’s not going to honor them!

He's a narcissistic criminal has been since the 80's. How are people still confused about this.