Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reason while elite clubs must win/under high pressure (ECNL or GA or MLSN) is twofold. First, they need to recruit the best players and if they aren't winning, the recruits will likely go to a rival that is. Second, winning ensures more attention with scouts at any/all events played.
There is no such pressure. Very very few make decisions about clubs based on wins. The number one decision point is distance and time of travel. The second is the playing development/coaching. Winning is just not important. Mid ECNL clubs kill on the recruiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone has the directive memo from ECNL to refs and coaches demanding aggressive play?
Anonymous wrote:My kids GA team was playing in an ECNL clubs tournament (beat a very good ECNL team and lost by a goal to an ok ECNL team). It was clearly obvious that ECNL players relied on cheap shots and fighting type tactics over skill. Why do parents put up with this type of behavior? Putting your kid through a gladiator cage when they're young wont make them better. It will make them get hurt earlier in their career which very likely will affect their chances to play in college or professionally.
One teams center defender was so dirty all she was doing was trying to hurt other players. One time after getting burned she dove head first into one of our players knees trying to take her out. I'd never seen such a blatant red card get completely ignored before. Later she did something similar which hurt one our players and she received a yellow. This kind of play needs to be addressed. You dont see it in the pros why is it allowed in youth soccer? If its allowed other clubs will find their own enforcer and over time it becomes 80s hockey with kids.
It just seems stupid to me to let kids get hurt by allowing play that the pros dont even allow.
Anonymous wrote:The reason while elite clubs must win/under high pressure (ECNL or GA or MLSN) is twofold. First, they need to recruit the best players and if they aren't winning, the recruits will likely go to a rival that is. Second, winning ensures more attention with scouts at any/all events played.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think poeple here understand how refs are assigned. It is all the same refs doing ECNL and GA games in the same region. There is no such thing as an ECNL ref. I have often reffed ECNL and GA games in the same weekend and I don't know of any refs who adjust their calls based on the league.
Yup, exactly. The premise of the post is incredibly flawed.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think poeple here understand how refs are assigned. It is all the same refs doing ECNL and GA games in the same region. There is no such thing as an ECNL ref. I have often reffed ECNL and GA games in the same weekend and I don't know of any refs who adjust their calls based on the league.
Anonymous wrote:ECNL is a sorry excuse for soccer.
Anonymous wrote:ECNL is a sorry excuse for soccer.
Anonymous wrote:The reason while elite clubs must win/under high pressure (ECNL or GA or MLSN) is twofold. First, they need to recruit the best players and if they aren't winning, the recruits will likely go to a rival that is. Second, winning ensures more attention with scouts at any/all events played.