Anonymous wrote:Speaking of ICE, this guy’s a badass.

https://www.threads.com/@adr1600/post/DKLdb54ubdU?xmt=AQF0CqnSjWsFvhTCTKDsMlPwLL1PYMfLfwqPRuQjCs3JzQ

Anonymous wrote:She lived in Mexico for 2 years with this condition before they crossed on a temporary visa. She can live in Mexico and be treated there. They prefer the medical treatments here. This sounds like a lifelong condition. Is the expectation that she lives here indefinitely?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When confronted with the fact that the parents are paying for this treatment.... When confronted with the fact that they are here legally.. when confronted with the fact that the doctor says that this treatment has to happen within us borders.. all these idiots can come up with are ad hominem attacks and weird ass deflections about the Pole.

They've lost the plot in the argument and this is all they have. Their dark bitter souls bear to the world

They are absolutely not paying for this treatment. California taxpayers are. An article in the LA times states the girl is on medi-cal (the CA version of medicaid), ""S.G.V.’s care is covered through Medi-Cal."
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-05-27/deportation-trump-healthcare-immigration-humanitarian


The father is an uber Driver from Colombia and the mother works cleaning restaurants and is from the Mexican state of Oaxaca. The parents met in Cancun, where they were working. Just before S.G.V. was born, the couple moved to nearby Playa del Carmen so her husband could work as an Uber driver. The girl spent most of her life in a hospital in Playa del Carmen, Mexico, tethered to feeding tubes 24 hours a day. She has short bowel syndrome, a rare condition that prevents her body from completely absorbing the nutrients of regular food. Doctors told them to relocate to Mexico City to get better care.

So when they heard the US government begun offering migrants appointments with border agents through a phone application called CBP One they signed up. Those let in received two-year protection from deportation and work permits. The father "told agents that he had once been kidnapped by cartel members in Mexico who extorted money and threatened to kill him. They also looked at the girl, whose vulnerable condition was obvious."

It would be heartbreaking for her to go back to Mexico since she is already here, but the US need better policies on who is let in and who isn't long-term. And if they accept people who cost a substantial amount to care for then the federal government should be responsible not each city or county or state.

People talk about Canada and Australia and wanting to leave for those countries. Neither of those countries allow anyone who is going to cost their health care or education system to easily immigrate or once in those country to stay. No allowing elderly migrant parents to immigrate and use expensive free health care. Australia has visa health care requirements. A few years ago a German doctor who was who legally working in Australia in a rural area was denied permanent residency because he had a son with Down syndrome and was judged by officials as likely to be a permanent drain on taxpayer funding due to his condition.

+1. No other country in the world allows you to cross the border and stay for free healthcare. None.

So you’re fine with her dying.

Question. She’s here legally. If her mother were here legally and wanted an abortion at 20 weeks, would that be fine? What if the mother came her legally while pregnant and she was born here as a citizen? Would you be okay with her being deported with mom as toddler and dying?

Where does “pro-life” draw the line?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When confronted with the fact that the parents are paying for this treatment.... When confronted with the fact that they are here legally.. when confronted with the fact that the doctor says that this treatment has to happen within us borders.. all these idiots can come up with are ad hominem attacks and weird ass deflections about the Pole.

They've lost the plot in the argument and this is all they have. Their dark bitter souls bear to the world

They are absolutely not paying for this treatment. California taxpayers are. An article in the LA times states the girl is on medi-cal (the CA version of medicaid), ""S.G.V.’s care is covered through Medi-Cal."
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-05-27/deportation-trump-healthcare-immigration-humanitarian


The father is an uber Driver from Colombia and the mother works cleaning restaurants and is from the Mexican state of Oaxaca. The parents met in Cancun, where they were working. Just before S.G.V. was born, the couple moved to nearby Playa del Carmen so her husband could work as an Uber driver. The girl spent most of her life in a hospital in Playa del Carmen, Mexico, tethered to feeding tubes 24 hours a day. She has short bowel syndrome, a rare condition that prevents her body from completely absorbing the nutrients of regular food. Doctors told them to relocate to Mexico City to get better care.

So when they heard the US government begun offering migrants appointments with border agents through a phone application called CBP One they signed up. Those let in received two-year protection from deportation and work permits. The father "told agents that he had once been kidnapped by cartel members in Mexico who extorted money and threatened to kill him. They also looked at the girl, whose vulnerable condition was obvious."

It would be heartbreaking for her to go back to Mexico since she is already here, but the US need better policies on who is let in and who isn't long-term. And if they accept people who cost a substantial amount to care for then the federal government should be responsible not each city or county or state.

People talk about Canada and Australia and wanting to leave for those countries. Neither of those countries allow anyone who is going to cost their health care or education system to easily immigrate or once in those country to stay. No allowing elderly migrant parents to immigrate and use expensive free health care. Australia has visa health care requirements. A few years ago a German doctor who was who legally working in Australia in a rural area was denied permanent residency because he had a son with Down syndrome and was judged by officials as likely to be a permanent drain on taxpayer funding due to his condition.

+1. No other country in the world allows you to cross the border and stay for free healthcare. None.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When confronted with the fact that the parents are paying for this treatment.... When confronted with the fact that they are here legally.. when confronted with the fact that the doctor says that this treatment has to happen within us borders.. all these idiots can come up with are ad hominem attacks and weird ass deflections about the Pole.

They've lost the plot in the argument and this is all they have. Their dark bitter souls bear to the world

They are absolutely not paying for this treatment. California taxpayers are. An article in the LA times states the girl is on medi-cal (the CA version of medicaid), ""S.G.V.’s care is covered through Medi-Cal."
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-05-27/deportation-trump-healthcare-immigration-humanitarian


The father is an uber Driver from Colombia and the mother works cleaning restaurants and is from the Mexican state of Oaxaca. The parents met in Cancun, where they were working. Just before S.G.V. was born, the couple moved to nearby Playa del Carmen so her husband could work as an Uber driver. The girl spent most of her life in a hospital in Playa del Carmen, Mexico, tethered to feeding tubes 24 hours a day. She has short bowel syndrome, a rare condition that prevents her body from completely absorbing the nutrients of regular food. Doctors told them to relocate to Mexico City to get better care.

So when they heard the US government begun offering migrants appointments with border agents through a phone application called CBP One they signed up. Those let in received two-year protection from deportation and work permits. The father "told agents that he had once been kidnapped by cartel members in Mexico who extorted money and threatened to kill him. They also looked at the girl, whose vulnerable condition was obvious."

It would be heartbreaking for her to go back to Mexico since she is already here, but the US need better policies on who is let in and who isn't long-term. And if they accept people who cost a substantial amount to care for then the federal government should be responsible not each city or county or state.

People talk about Canada and Australia and wanting to leave for those countries. Neither of those countries allow anyone who is going to cost their health care or education system to easily immigrate or once in those country to stay. No allowing elderly migrant parents to immigrate and use expensive free health care. Australia has visa health care requirements. A few years ago a German doctor who was who legally working in Australia in a rural area was denied permanent residency because he had a son with Down syndrome and was judged by officials as likely to be a permanent drain on taxpayer funding due to his condition.

Anonymous wrote:She’s already been born. So the pro-life party is fine with killing her.

Anonymous wrote:When confronted with the fact that the parents are paying for this treatment.... When confronted with the fact that they are here legally.. when confronted with the fact that the doctor says that this treatment has to happen within us borders.. all these idiots can come up with are ad hominem attacks and weird ass deflections about the Pole.

They've lost the plot in the argument and this is all they have. Their dark bitter souls bear to the world

Anonymous wrote:
Trump has ordered a critically ill four-year-old Mexican girl to leave the country. She could die within days, experts say

Deysi Vargas and her 4-year-old daughter were granted temporary humanitarian permission to enter the U.S. in 2023 due to a life-threatening condition

Arsenault said in a letter seen by The Los Angeles Times that if there is an interruption to administering nutrition to her system, “it could be fatal within a matter of days.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-mexico-deportation-critically-ill-child-b2758809.html


MAGA/Republicans hate life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also it can be given in the home in long term situations

First, TPN is available world wide. But several countries, including Mexico, have little to no availability of certain types (say liver sparing or kidney sparing). So no, this girl was not getting what she needed at home. Her parents applied for her humane parole, she was granted it, and now you guys are looking for people's to justify deporting this girl. This child.

Why doesn't Mexico have access to this type of TPN? I don't believe it for a second. If it can be ordered and provided here, it should not be an issue for Mexican health systems to administer it there.

We cannot import every sob story. We cannot afford to pay for this noncitizen's medical care for the remainder of her life, which will be DECADES of expensive care.

The cruelty was Biden giving this family a two-year pass, hoping they could stay here indefinitely. Ripping off the band-aid hurts, but needs to be done.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

The little girl had to show she had enough money to pay for care in the United States in order to be granted humanitarian parole. This would have been an element of her visa interview and she would have gone into CBP secondary upon arrival in the United States.

The article explains that they didnt enter that way. She had several surgeries in a Mexico and was getting care there but understandably the parents wanted better care. She was immediately hospitalized for weeks at a children’s hospital in San Diego when they arrived at the border. She requires Total Parenteral Nutrition. California taxpayers are paying for her care through medi-cal (Medicaid program in California).

No. She was granted humanitarian parole. Making an appointment through Trump’s CBP app doesn’t remove the obligation for a CBP officer to interview and grant parole. The article says that it was granted for two years.

Further, this treatment is not available in Mexico which is the pprimary reason they came here...not free healthcare.
People are so damned dumb and cruel

how much have you donated through her gofundme page?

Clever retirt I actually donated a hundred dollars because my guess this is for the legal fees to stop the deportation that will most likely kill her daughter.

You are still dumb and cruel

is a token amount the max you can afford? if you believe the story and true and you care about this particular child, why don't you do something meaningful to help her.