Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
I think you are accurate all the way until your point about the threshold to be considered pile. After that, it is not random though it may look that way to the outside. The decisions are based on things like.:
- Major (classics gets in over bio; gender studies over engineering; English over CS)
- Talent/ability (National award winning squash player gets in over varsity baseball captain; neither recruited. National ranked figure skater gets on over state champion soccer player; neither recruited)
- essays (what kids reveal in essays matters a lot more than people think.) There is a right way to do essays in the wrong way to do essays. Unfortunately, most HS English teachers advise kids to do the wrong thing. It’s not about overcomplicated sentence and essay structures. The writing should be at easy to read/grasp level; varied sentences, including some very short sentences; poignant, personal, and touching on at least 3-4 of your personal values. It should also not repeat anything covered anywhere else in the application, including your major.
- LOR (an exceptional LOR can make a difference)
Look at the T10 scoring rubrics. You can see why certain kids get in once you understand the scoring.
What makes a LOR “exceptional”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being sociable, friendly and engaging with classmates/teachers, a contributor in the classroom, is much more important than people realize.
Teachers talk amongst each other, "Oh you have Jimmy next year? He's a great kid."
The more community-oriented and outgoing the kid is, the likelier their reputation will smooth the way for great recommendations and other soft support.
So, basically, you’re promoting extroverted kids only? If a student is quiet by nature, they are perceived as not friendly and not contributing?
I hate it that teachers are so shallow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:human being. Her interpretations of literature were stunning. So the teachers wrote her really special recs that highlighted this unique personal quality, of the "Most unique student in my entire teaching career" "rare ability" "stands out above any person I ever met" kind of thing.
You can keep writing that every year… who is vetting you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At our FCPS, the kids getting into top 10 schools + ivies are overwhelmingly from these 3 categories:
ROTC with very good grades/SATs who are usually also getting appointed to one of the military academies
Underrepresented minorities with good grades/SATs This is the biggest group. Our school is almost entirely upper middle class, if that make a difference. Some are immigrant families, not from asia though.
Music students with very good grades and high SATs. Not necessarily music majors though, just good enough at an instrument or vocally to submit a very high level music supplement.
I don't recall the last time a high stat white or asian kid from our high school got into an Ivy level school without music or ROTC. Based on our school, the biggest hooks are URM, ROTC and music, all 3 with high grades and SATs.
As an FCPS teacher, I fully agree. ROTC and/or URM students are getting into top schools. I haven't seen the music hook, but maybe it's not as big at my school.
No athletes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think individual teachers necessarily have the broad, big-picture view of a student that OP seems to think they do - at least not very often. They know how a kid performed in their class and what they wrote in a rec letter, but may have minimal insight into other areas of the student’s academic or extracurricular performance and interests.
Not always, of course - there are certainly cases where a teacher and student really click and the teacher becomes more of a mentor and confidante and therefore does have a lot if insight into the student beyond that teacher’s own class, but I doubt that’s the majority experience.
As a former high school teacher I can say this is mostly true. I had 120-140 students every year. There were very few students I knew well enough to know their whole profile well as in knew how they did in all their classes, how they did on standardized tests, knew what extracurriculars they did, etc. Most students I didn’t know anything about their parents/family situation, financial situation. If they asked me for a letter of recommendation then I obviously got more info but for majority of students, I knew very little if anything about their stats or their college app process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
I think you are accurate all the way until your point about the threshold to be considered pile. After that, it is not random though it may look that way to the outside. The decisions are based on things like.:
- Major (classics gets in over bio; gender studies over engineering; English over CS)
- Talent/ability (National award winning squash player gets in over varsity baseball captain; neither recruited. National ranked figure skater gets on over state champion soccer player; neither recruited)
- essays (what kids reveal in essays matters a lot more than people think.) There is a right way to do essays in the wrong way to do essays. Unfortunately, most HS English teachers advise kids to do the wrong thing. It’s not about overcomplicated sentence and essay structures. The writing should be at easy to read/grasp level; varied sentences, including some very short sentences; poignant, personal, and touching on at least 3-4 of your personal values. It should also not repeat anything covered anywhere else in the application, including your major.
- LOR (an exceptional LOR can make a difference)
Look at the T10 scoring rubrics. You can see why certain kids get in once you understand the scoring.
Anonymous wrote:The immense majority of teachers do not have any insight into college admissions, OP. They're just like the rest of the population. US colleges are that opaque. It's not like this in any other country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a simple formula - rich or hooked - for everyone else it's a lottery
Hardly a lottery for unhooked applicants without the stats.
Yeah you're right - it's not a lottery. The admissions rate at Stanford this most recent cycle (24/25) was 3.6%
Is there really a marked difference between 100% not happening or 97% chance not happening???
Anonymous wrote:Being sociable, friendly and engaging with classmates/teachers, a contributor in the classroom, is much more important than people realize.
Teachers talk amongst each other, "Oh you have Jimmy next year? He's a great kid."
The more community-oriented and outgoing the kid is, the likelier their reputation will smooth the way for great recommendations and other soft support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a simple formula - rich or hooked - for everyone else it's a lottery
Hardly a lottery for unhooked applicants without the stats.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Private high school grads make up a disproportionately large percentage of the incoming freshmen classes at private T20 colleges.
They are a small overall % of US high school graduates - but a large percentage of incoming freshman at private colleges. Ask yourself how. And why?
This is a very obvious/easy one: Bc their parents can afford it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Private high school grads make up a disproportionately large percentage of the incoming freshmen classes at private T20 colleges.
They are a small overall % of US high school graduates - but a large percentage of incoming freshman at private colleges. Ask yourself how. And why?
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think individual teachers necessarily have the broad, big-picture view of a student that OP seems to think they do - at least not very often. They know how a kid performed in their class and what they wrote in a rec letter, but may have minimal insight into other areas of the student’s academic or extracurricular performance and interests.
Not always, of course - there are certainly cases where a teacher and student really click and the teacher becomes more of a mentor and confidante and therefore does have a lot if insight into the student beyond that teacher’s own class, but I doubt that’s the majority experience.