That column is dystopian bullshit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?

Yes I could google it, but since many here are totally convinced it's happening, I want to see what you're reading.

You comes off kind of passive aggressive. When you say with “Yeah, I could just Google it,” you admit you do not really need help, so it feels like you are testing us rather than really asking. Saying “since many here are totally convinced” hints that you think we are gullible, and “totally” ramps up your sarcasm. “I want to see what you’re reading” flips the burden on us prove a point. You are scoffing while pretending to be polite.

So, go to google and do a search.

Not PP but, yeah, if you’re going to start a thread like this you should be able to defend it.

No one has to do anything but stay black and die.

I said “should,” not has to, but thanks for confirming this thread is based on nothing.

Logically fallacy--saying that no one needs to answer your rhetorical questions does not mean the information at hand doesn't exist.

Red herring—trying to distract from the fact that you can’t produce anything in response to PP saying he wanted to see what you’re reading.

What a pathetic thread.

No one said they couldn't produce anything. They are choosing not to address a scoffing question.

You think the thread is pathetic. I don't think it is. So I guess we cancel each other out. Thread, continue on!

“Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?” is not a scoffing question. It’s a request for a modicum of evidence in favor of the original point of the thread.

So by all means, continue on with this evidence-free thread.

Douthat column few days ago NYTimes

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?

Yes I could google it, but since many here are totally convinced it's happening, I want to see what you're reading.

You comes off kind of passive aggressive. When you say with “Yeah, I could just Google it,” you admit you do not really need help, so it feels like you are testing us rather than really asking. Saying “since many here are totally convinced” hints that you think we are gullible, and “totally” ramps up your sarcasm. “I want to see what you’re reading” flips the burden on us prove a point. You are scoffing while pretending to be polite.

So, go to google and do a search.

Not PP but, yeah, if you’re going to start a thread like this you should be able to defend it.

No one has to do anything but stay black and die.

I said “should,” not has to, but thanks for confirming this thread is based on nothing.

Logically fallacy--saying that no one needs to answer your rhetorical questions does not mean the information at hand doesn't exist.

Red herring—trying to distract from the fact that you can’t produce anything in response to PP saying he wanted to see what you’re reading.

What a pathetic thread.

No one said they couldn't produce anything. They are choosing not to address a scoffing question.

You think the thread is pathetic. I don't think it is. So I guess we cancel each other out. Thread, continue on!

“Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?” is not a scoffing question. It’s a request for a modicum of evidence in favor of the original point of the thread.

So by all means, continue on with this evidence-free thread.

ok, we will do so, happily! DCUM is not a college course, we do not cite out sources MLA or ALA style here.

Yes, because supplying someone with a link is the same as a college course. God forbid you back up your arguments with any evidence or even thought-provoking pieces.

Instead, it’s just vibes and some of the dumbest takes imaginable. Which could actually be DCUM’s slogan, to be fair.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?

Yes I could google it, but since many here are totally convinced it's happening, I want to see what you're reading.

You comes off kind of passive aggressive. When you say with “Yeah, I could just Google it,” you admit you do not really need help, so it feels like you are testing us rather than really asking. Saying “since many here are totally convinced” hints that you think we are gullible, and “totally” ramps up your sarcasm. “I want to see what you’re reading” flips the burden on us prove a point. You are scoffing while pretending to be polite.

So, go to google and do a search.

Not PP but, yeah, if you’re going to start a thread like this you should be able to defend it.

No one has to do anything but stay black and die.

I said “should,” not has to, but thanks for confirming this thread is based on nothing.

Logically fallacy--saying that no one needs to answer your rhetorical questions does not mean the information at hand doesn't exist.

Red herring—trying to distract from the fact that you can’t produce anything in response to PP saying he wanted to see what you’re reading.

What a pathetic thread.

No one said they couldn't produce anything. They are choosing not to address a scoffing question.

You think the thread is pathetic. I don't think it is. So I guess we cancel each other out. Thread, continue on!

“Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?” is not a scoffing question. It’s a request for a modicum of evidence in favor of the original point of the thread.

So by all means, continue on with this evidence-free thread.

ok, we will do so, happily! DCUM is not a college course, we do not cite out sources MLA or ALA style here.

DP, but the only time people start shouting "source?" is when they have lost all their composure and exhausted their knowlege of a topic, and it's their last resort.

I just ignore those who ask for "sources" because either they are trolling, or are simply incapable of conducting their own research and have to be told what to believe.

That's a common marker for knowing you are dealing with A.I. chatbots also, as they only repeat online info for the most part and cannot formulate new ideas.

This is rubbish.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are there three threads about AI? Someone is having a panic attack.

Its a troll. Possibly another country. Use your brains.

ofc its a troll of some variant. but which variant? and why?

Thats the new warfare. Social media. Just make up lies and spread. Don’t fall into the trap people!

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?

Yes I could google it, but since many here are totally convinced it's happening, I want to see what you're reading.

You comes off kind of passive aggressive. When you say with “Yeah, I could just Google it,” you admit you do not really need help, so it feels like you are testing us rather than really asking. Saying “since many here are totally convinced” hints that you think we are gullible, and “totally” ramps up your sarcasm. “I want to see what you’re reading” flips the burden on us prove a point. You are scoffing while pretending to be polite.

So, go to google and do a search.

Not PP but, yeah, if you’re going to start a thread like this you should be able to defend it.

No one has to do anything but stay black and die.

I said “should,” not has to, but thanks for confirming this thread is based on nothing.

Logically fallacy--saying that no one needs to answer your rhetorical questions does not mean the information at hand doesn't exist.

Red herring—trying to distract from the fact that you can’t produce anything in response to PP saying he wanted to see what you’re reading.

What a pathetic thread.

No one said they couldn't produce anything. They are choosing not to address a scoffing question.

You think the thread is pathetic. I don't think it is. So I guess we cancel each other out. Thread, continue on!

“Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?” is not a scoffing question. It’s a request for a modicum of evidence in favor of the original point of the thread.

So by all means, continue on with this evidence-free thread.

ok, we will do so, happily! DCUM is not a college course, we do not cite out sources MLA or ALA style here.

Anonymous wrote:OP obviously never took an econ class.

Not OP, but don't confuse corporate indoctrination with actual education.

Anonymous wrote:Back to the mines everyone!

Miners get good pay in some countries. Hazardous though.

Anonymous wrote:Why are there three threads about AI? Someone is having a panic attack.

Haven't been keeping up with all the recent advancements in A.I. and robotics huh? It's moving fast now.

OP obviously never took an econ class.

Come to Vermont, learn the gig economy. We are giving the best to our DC. Music lessons, sports, land, excellent theater opportunities and all around education. And for it all our COL is way less and our lives are so much happier. We may come back to DC someday but we will have plenty money and sanity and our amazing kids will be launched with out all your toxicity. It’s smallish town but we travel!

Anonymous wrote:Why are there three threads about AI? Someone is having a panic attack.

You’ll find out.

Anonymous wrote:Practicing law. That’s what I’m doing to prepare. AI can make discovery easy and help write a brief (that I cite check myself!) and do other mundane things that make junior associate and doc review jobs harder to find. But AI can’t negotiate a contract, do a deposition, appear in Court, or give due process. It definitely doesn’t have a law license.

So no, all white collar jobs are not disappearing.

🔥

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?

Yes I could google it, but since many here are totally convinced it's happening, I want to see what you're reading.

You comes off kind of passive aggressive. When you say with “Yeah, I could just Google it,” you admit you do not really need help, so it feels like you are testing us rather than really asking. Saying “since many here are totally convinced” hints that you think we are gullible, and “totally” ramps up your sarcasm. “I want to see what you’re reading” flips the burden on us prove a point. You are scoffing while pretending to be polite.

So, go to google and do a search.

Not PP but, yeah, if you’re going to start a thread like this you should be able to defend it.

No one has to do anything but stay black and die.

I said “should,” not has to, but thanks for confirming this thread is based on nothing.

Logically fallacy--saying that no one needs to answer your rhetorical questions does not mean the information at hand doesn't exist.

Red herring—trying to distract from the fact that you can’t produce anything in response to PP saying he wanted to see what you’re reading.

What a pathetic thread.

No one said they couldn't produce anything. They are choosing not to address a scoffing question.

You think the thread is pathetic. I don't think it is. So I guess we cancel each other out. Thread, continue on!

“Anyone have a good link on how/why/when or evidence that white collar jobs are going away?” is not a scoffing question. It’s a request for a modicum of evidence in favor of the original point of the thread.

So by all means, continue on with this evidence-free thread.