Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory, because I am still irate about an article I read, discussing how they'd admitted a poor, relatively high performing first gen kid from Texas and proceeded to ruin her life.
Harvard, because for decades institutionally they did not care about the education of their undergraduates, and now the undergraduates don't care either, spending all their spare time trying to network with each other.
Howard, which is ineptly run and coasting off a reputation that has been unjustified since at least desegregation, and also sounds too much like "Harvard" for my tastes.
Duke, which has never done any soul searching about how it tried to ruin the lives of its own lacrosse players.
NYU, which is wildly overpriced and full of people who think NYU is a good idea.
Columbia, which even before the latest round of protests was famous for raking in a ton of cash by running scam master's degrees on the gullible.
What would you like Duke to have done. There were lots of lawsuits and the kids got paid and that also likely limits what Duke can say or do. That is a really dumb reason to dislike a school. As are most of your reasons for other schools. Please tell us where you went so we can dislike it for no good reason. If you even went to college.
Anonymous wrote:Most overtly competitive institutions. Neither I not DS want that after 3 stressful years of hyper competitive high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia. Those protests.
Those protesters are on to something. Gotta give them credit. Europe just sent Israel a strong message to tone down their genocidal behavior
Anonymous wrote:Columbia. Those protests.
Anonymous wrote:Emory fake prestige because of how they admit 2/3rds of their class early decision then offer spots to their community college. Just sketchy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brown. I dislike the open curriculum.
I never really understood this as you can make open the core if a student wanted.
There's value in having a body of students who you know have received a common education rather than simply pursuing their own narrow interests. It gives them a common base of knowledge to bring to other classes. Anecdotally, I don't think many Brown students get a very well rounded education either. It's very selective but I've never been impressed by a Brown alumni I knew.
Not my experience there, selected for vast interests. They don’t want those that are narrow in focus, but you’re entitled to your opinion of course.