Anonymous wrote:They are being deported to other countries because their home country won't take them back.
Now why would their home country not take them back?
Anonymous wrote:Liberals 8 years ago: "OMG Trump said 'sh****** countries. Impeach!"
Liberals now: "OMG Trump is deporting people to sh****** countries!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's zero consequences for him violating court rulings of all levels, so he doesn't care.
There is literally NO way to stop him without the help of a handful of Republicans and they're all too chickenshit.
It’s beyond time to start dragging them into court for criminal contempt.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-contempt-court-south-sudan-b2755543.html
Anonymous wrote:There's zero consequences for him violating court rulings of all levels, so he doesn't care.
There is literally NO way to stop him without the help of a handful of Republicans and they're all too chickenshit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.
Rendition.
What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?
That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.
And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!
Yep, this is what people get for sabotaging the wall and other reasonable migrant controls.
Those are .is demeanors at most and the punishment is not a foreign prison. Just stop trying to defend this. It is beyond indefensible.
I think the asylum fraud was indefensible but people defended it. Now no immigrant can claim asylum here because this fate is worse than whatever BS story they have. In fact they should flee here and claim asylum elsewhere because of persecution right?
Clearly, you've never worked with people claiming asylum. Do some volunteering with these people, and get back to me.
Oh, and be prepared to hear some of the most horrific stories you can imagine, with photos and witnesses.
I'll wait.
Yes, the lawyers coach them well.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.
Rendition.
What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?
That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.
And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!
Yep, this is what people get for sabotaging the wall and other reasonable migrant controls.
Those are .is demeanors at most and the punishment is not a foreign prison. Just stop trying to defend this. It is beyond indefensible.
I think the asylum fraud was indefensible but people defended it. Now no immigrant can claim asylum here because this fate is worse than whatever BS story they have. In fact they should flee here and claim asylum elsewhere because of persecution right?
Clearly, you've never worked with people claiming asylum. Do some volunteering with these people, and get back to me.
Oh, and be prepared to hear some of the most horrific stories you can imagine, with photos and witnesses.
I'll wait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.
Rendition.
What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?
That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.
And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!
Please tell me you've never worked with stateless people...oh, you did.
Yes, this shit happens even if you've never heard of it. I've known people forced into exile and have the second host country withdraw their permission to reside and cancel their travel documents - they are effectively stateless.
NO deportation means removing people from the country they are in.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.
This
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.
Rendition.
What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?
That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.
And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!
Yep, this is what people get for sabotaging the wall and other reasonable migrant controls.
Those are .is demeanors at most and the punishment is not a foreign prison. Just stop trying to defend this. It is beyond indefensible.
I think the asylum fraud was indefensible but people defended it. Now no immigrant can claim asylum here because this fate is worse than whatever BS story they have. In fact they should flee here and claim asylum elsewhere because of persecution right?
Clearly, you've never worked with people claiming asylum. Do some volunteering with these people, and get back to me.
Oh, and be prepared to hear some of the most horrific stories you can imagine, with photos and witnesses.
I'll wait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.
Rendition.
What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?
That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.
And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!
Yep, this is what people get for sabotaging the wall and other reasonable migrant controls.
Those are .is demeanors at most and the punishment is not a foreign prison. Just stop trying to defend this. It is beyond indefensible.
I think the asylum fraud was indefensible but people defended it. Now no immigrant can claim asylum here because this fate is worse than whatever BS story they have. In fact they should flee here and claim asylum elsewhere because of persecution right?