Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can I ask what team this is? We just accepted a spot and there were rumors the roster was going to increase. My son got multiple offers and we will just move him to another team if some kids aren't going to play and there is that much competition. Playing only part of the game is different than only some kids dressing for it.
Hahaha such BS.
Your ego won't let him play on any other team than the one that wins. If this wasn't true you'd just have him play on the B team.
Sounds like a dumb comment from a dumb coach or club admin trying to justifying ripping people off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can I ask what team this is? We just accepted a spot and there were rumors the roster was going to increase. My son got multiple offers and we will just move him to another team if some kids aren't going to play and there is that much competition. Playing only part of the game is different than only some kids dressing for it.
Hahaha such BS.
Your ego won't let him play on any other team than the one that wins. If this wasn't true you'd just have him play on the B team.
Anonymous wrote:Can I ask what team this is? We just accepted a spot and there were rumors the roster was going to increase. My son got multiple offers and we will just move him to another team if some kids aren't going to play and there is that much competition. Playing only part of the game is different than only some kids dressing for it.
Anonymous wrote:Can I ask what team this is? We just accepted a spot and there were rumors the roster was going to increase. My son got multiple offers and we will just move him to another team if some kids aren't going to play and there is that much competition. Playing only part of the game is different than only some kids dressing for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's humorous listening to parents complain about "over-rostered" teams. You are the ones that created the situation by forcing your way onto the top teams. Clubs are just responding by trying to give other pushy parents what they want.
Over rostering isn't the real issue. It's either the player that has to sit out that week. Remember you wanted to play on the top team. Or its the player that sees someone new as a threat to their position on the team. Either way over rostering is a way to blame clubs for a situation parents enabled + created.
Good point but the coach/club bears zero responsibility? Would it kill someone to tell these parents “Just being up front, I can squeeze her in but her playing time will be limited”. No, it wouldn’t and it would be good business practice. Playing coy and being opaque is not.
In what world does telling a parent that their kid can be on the team but they won't be playing that much = a likely to pay in full customer?
Not saying certain things will = a paid in full customer.
See how it works? Coaches play as many game as parents do getting players on teams and getting parents to pay in full. Maybe you're new to all this but generally parents with kids on high level over rostered teams know what theyre getting into.
Being transparent before snatching someone’s cash is fine
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's humorous listening to parents complain about "over-rostered" teams. You are the ones that created the situation by forcing your way onto the top teams. Clubs are just responding by trying to give other pushy parents what they want.
Over rostering isn't the real issue. It's either the player that has to sit out that week. Remember you wanted to play on the top team. Or its the player that sees someone new as a threat to their position on the team. Either way over rostering is a way to blame clubs for a situation parents enabled + created.
Good point but the coach/club bears zero responsibility? Would it kill someone to tell these parents “Just being up front, I can squeeze her in but her playing time will be limited”. No, it wouldn’t and it would be good business practice. Playing coy and being opaque is not.
In what world does telling a parent that their kid can be on the team but they won't be playing that much = a likely to pay in full customer?
Not saying certain things will = a paid in full customer.
See how it works? Coaches play as many game as parents do getting players on teams and getting parents to pay in full. Maybe you're new to all this but generally parents with kids on high level over rostered teams know what theyre getting into.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's humorous listening to parents complain about "over-rostered" teams. You are the ones that created the situation by forcing your way onto the top teams. Clubs are just responding by trying to give other pushy parents what they want.
Over rostering isn't the real issue. It's either the player that has to sit out that week. Remember you wanted to play on the top team. Or its the player that sees someone new as a threat to their position on the team. Either way over rostering is a way to blame clubs for a situation parents enabled + created.
Good point but the coach/club bears zero responsibility? Would it kill someone to tell these parents “Just being up front, I can squeeze her in but her playing time will be limited”. No, it wouldn’t and it would be good business practice. Playing coy and being opaque is not.
Anonymous wrote:It's humorous listening to parents complain about "over-rostered" teams. You are the ones that created the situation by forcing your way onto the top teams. Clubs are just responding by trying to give other pushy parents what they want.
Over rostering isn't the real issue. It's either the player that has to sit out that week. Remember you wanted to play on the top team. Or its the player that sees someone new as a threat to their position on the team. Either way over rostering is a way to blame clubs for a situation parents enabled + created.
Anonymous wrote:DD’s club team next season will have 21-23 players on the roster but only 18 will be able to dress for games. Those not dressing for a given game may be able to play with the B team that weekend.
Is this typical? What kind of team dynamics can we expect under such a system?
If the same kids are left out each week my guess is they’ll eventually leave the club.
If kids are trying to compete for the 18 game day slots week to week, I guess it might make for a better team — but not much team camaraderie, if your friend is also your enemy.
Different amounts of playing time due to differences in ability/contribution on the field is one thing. But to be competing just to get to go to the games seems potentially destabilizing to team morale.
If you’ve experienced this kind of system already, how is this likely to shake out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At U-littles everyone should have about the same playing time
Why? To keep customers happy? My kid is wrapping up a U11 season on Pre-ECNL and we have to ensure players get equal playing time. Even players who play 4 different sports and never put in any work on soccer are getting equal playing time with kids who are grinding and outperforming them by miles. For what purpose? They should develop the players who want to be developed and let the others ride the bench more.
Equal playing time is why rec ball was created.
Most clubs have a "competitive team" by around u15 or u16. Generally kids should get equal playing time up until then.
Again...why? And what club are you at that competitive starts at u15 and up????
Because every kid is developing differently and by 15 everyone is HS aged so theoretically able to play against adults. Boys are different but the best in the world debut at 15 so not completely off. Before u15 or u16 is better arugment because its recruitment time. Best players should be on the field being showcased period. It’s mutually beneficial to both club and top players. Equal playing time is for Jeff Cup and WAGS. Prior to u15 we shouldn't even be keeping score if we care about developing soccer players.
Not every player on u15 and u16 is looking to play soccer in college. Some joined the team because they like to play soccer with other players at their same level.