Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.

Nobody wants to live in a coubtry where those two qualifications guarantee life tenure.

She was qualified because she was qualified. She just happens to be a black woman. What are you talking about. Based on Trump's hires, she was competent which makes her bad. Oh, and she doesn't look like a plastic barbie.

DP. You are missing PP’s point. PP was responding to someone who was saying she was qualified for her job because she was a woman and black. And honestly, if you say someone is a woman and black, that doesn’t tell you at all if they are qualified. It might even make you think they are more likely than not NOT qualified, and instead were hired for a quota.

In this case, it sounds like this person was qualified and that she was only fired due to politics. I think that is a shame.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fox News host Julie Banderas just released a new children’s book, so she’s a leading candidate.

Bingo. There must be a FOX bimbo already in mind for the role.

I love when Democrats seem to think no one will notice their misogyny.

The previous Librarian of Congress that Trump fired was a woman. PP's comment isn't about it being a woman, it's specifically about the cookie-cutter bleached-blonde, crucifix-wearing-phony-Christian propagandists that FOX and Trump hire. You trying to play the "MiSOgYnIsT" card here is a complete fail.

So typical that you're lying. Trump never fired any previous Librarian of Congress. Provide a citation to back up your claim. But you seem highly unhinged, so we won't hold our breath.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.

Nobody wants to live in a coubtry where those two qualifications guarantee life tenure.

She was qualified because she was qualified. She just happens to be a black woman. What are you talking about. Based on Trump's hires, she was competent which makes her bad. Oh, and she doesn't look like a plastic barbie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

Younger than Trump. Msybe he should hsve been fired

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is racist and hates women. We know this.

Smart women of any color make him feel threatened.

That explains why he never felt threatened by Kamala.

Np. You think you are clever but you are not. Orange man was and is threatened by former VP Harris

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.

Nobody wants to live in a coubtry where those two qualifications guarantee life tenure.

It’s a 10 year appointment. She is in year 9.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.

Nobody wants to live in a coubtry where those two qualifications guarantee life tenure.

The secret Miller agenda. Librarian of Congress appoints head of Copyright Office. That office handles IP for movies, sound recodings, lots of valuable stuff and administers rules about AI using IP.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe if she had a DUI they'd keep her.

Sorry. Too competent for this administration! Fired.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.

What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead

What is very old. She's not very old.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fox News host Julie Banderas just released a new children’s book, so she’s a leading candidate.

Bingo. There must be a FOX bimbo already in mind for the role.

I love when Democrats seem to think no one will notice their misogyny.

The previous Librarian of Congress that Trump fired was a woman. PP's comment isn't about it being a woman, it's specifically about the cookie-cutter bleached-blonde, crucifix-wearing-phony-Christian propagandists that FOX and Trump hire. You trying to play the "MiSOgYnIsT" card here is a complete fail.

Thanks for displaying your misogyny and religious bigotry so openly. Try to be more kind and tolerant toward people who don’t look like you, vote like you, and pray like you. You will be a happier person.

DP: No, actually being “tolerant” towards people who are bigots won’t make me “happier”. If anything, it emboldens the bigots — and makes them believe that they have more general support than they actually do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fox News host Julie Banderas just released a new children’s book, so she’s a leading candidate.

Bingo. There must be a FOX bimbo already in mind for the role.

I love when Democrats seem to think no one will notice their misogyny.

The previous Librarian of Congress that Trump fired was a woman. PP's comment isn't about it being a woman, it's specifically about the cookie-cutter bleached-blonde, crucifix-wearing-phony-Christian propagandists that FOX and Trump hire. You trying to play the "MiSOgYnIsT" card here is a complete fail.

Thanks for displaying your misogyny and religious bigotry so openly. Try to be more kind and tolerant toward people who don’t look like you, vote like you, and pray like you. You will be a happier person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fox News host Julie Banderas just released a new children’s book, so she’s a leading candidate.

Bingo. There must be a FOX bimbo already in mind for the role.

I love when Democrats seem to think no one will notice their misogyny.

I love it when MAGAs seem to think no one will notice their intolerance and racism.

Ah, demonstrating yet again that you have no leg to stand on. Remember, Biden fired many of Trump's appointees. And Obama did the same. Were those firings due to intolerance and racism?

Political appointees get fired or resign. It’s understood they are likely to be replaced when a new administration arrives, even of the same party. However there are some appointments that are apolitical (Librarian of Congress) or who are suppose to cross administrations for the security and stability of government.

Trump’s just mad at her because there aren’t enough picture books.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fox News host Julie Banderas just released a new children’s book, so she’s a leading candidate.

Bingo. There must be a FOX bimbo already in mind for the role.

I love when Democrats seem to think no one will notice their misogyny.

I love it when MAGAs seem to think no one will notice their intolerance and racism.

Ah, demonstrating yet again that you have no leg to stand on. Remember, Biden fired many of Trump's appointees. And Obama did the same. Were those firings due to intolerance and racism?

Political appointees get fired or resign. It’s understood they are likely to be replaced when a new administration arrives, even of the same party. However there are some appointments that are apolitical (Librarian of Congress) or who are suppose to cross administrations for the security and stability of government.

Also, if Trump thinks she's so bad at her job, why didn't her fire her his first time in office?