Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:San Antonio
The riverwalk? All for tourists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah - I define wander as I can explore and find new and interesting things to see/window shop for at least a few hours. By that definition, sticking with NYC is where it's at. To a degree, you can do that in Boston/Chicago/Philly. The difference is the timeframe. I love New Orleans and Santa Fe but I'm not sure that you can wander for more than an hour in either place. There's just not enough ground to find stuff. In the neighborhoods of Chicago you could though. Again, the difference is between wandering while walking and needing to drive to different points, get out and walk for 20 mins before you have to change locations driving again. SF is like that as is LA. There's certainly neighborhoods to wander there but you can't really do it to scale. Not like you can in Venice or Paris.
You can walk San Francisco end to end. I have.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah - I define wander as I can explore and find new and interesting things to see/window shop for at least a few hours. By that definition, sticking with NYC is where it's at. To a degree, you can do that in Boston/Chicago/Philly. The difference is the timeframe. I love New Orleans and Santa Fe but I'm not sure that you can wander for more than an hour in either place. There's just not enough ground to find stuff. In the neighborhoods of Chicago you could though. Again, the difference is between wandering while walking and needing to drive to different points, get out and walk for 20 mins before you have to change locations driving again. SF is like that as is LA. There's certainly neighborhoods to wander there but you can't really do it to scale. Not like you can in Venice or Paris.
Anonymous wrote:Are you kidding? You wander in Venice or Innsbruck. NYC and the Chicago neighborhoods. Def not New Orleans, Austin, San Antonio, etc. Maybe a bit in Boston and a touch in Philly. Not SF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:San Antonio
The riverwalk? All for tourists.
The Riverwalk is charming for a half an hour. After that, not much to do in San Antonio.
New poster to this thread. We walked to the Alamo, Hemisfair, and Historic Market Square from the River Walk. If you like to walk, you can walk. You can also bike to the other missions. I'd actually rather "wander" around in San Antonio than NYC. I mean I walk all over NYC, but I don't consider it wandering as such Wandering to me implies you're somewhere not super dense with some places to go but not an overwhelming number of places to go.
Also agree Philly is very walkable!
Not necessarily advocating for San Antonio, but you can spend 3 days in San Antonio and a lot of other places and feel like you've seen most everything you wanted to see even with some wandering. I've visited NYC about 10 times and there's so much more I haven't done. It really depends on what OP is looking for.
Anonymous wrote:San Francisco is tops for me, followed by NYC and New Orleans.
Anonymous wrote:What is your favorite US city to wander around in foot? Looking for somewhere with good restaurants, cafes, some nightlife, cute/unique shops, reasonably safe. This is for a 3 day weekend so access to nature for a hike or something outdoorsy one day is a plus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:San Antonio
The riverwalk? All for tourists.
The Riverwalk is charming for a half an hour. After that, not much to do in San Antonio.
New poster to this thread. We walked to the Alamo, Hemisfair, and Historic Market Square from the River Walk. If you like to walk, you can walk. You can also bike to the other missions. I'd actually rather "wander" around in San Antonio than NYC. I mean I walk all over NYC, but I don't consider it wandering as such Wandering to me implies you're somewhere not super dense with some places to go but not an overwhelming number of places to go.
Also agree Philly is very walkable!