Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kashmir is the most beautiful place I have ever visited. The people were very kind but shy around tourists.

So sad that they have suffered so much and been used as pawns by both sides.

What do the Kashmiri people desire? Do they wish to continue to be occupied by India in one the most militarized regions in the entire world?

There is one soldier for six Kashmiris, totaling 100,000 soldiers. And Modi has revoked Kashmir's constitutional autonomy.

Kashmir is largely a mix of Muslims and Hindus who both want the others gone.

Anonymous wrote:So, a new war has started under Trump.

It can't be.....trump said on day one there would be world peace. Everything that was wrong in the world would be magically fixed with a big alpha male like him and his cronies. It was all Biden's fault. Guess not huh. Come on MAGA start spinning your stories to protect your felon.

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan is a failed state but thanks to U.S they have nuclear weapons.

Whelp we are now a failing state with Donnie dementia in charge ((shrug))

How are everyone’s families doing? I have family in Lahore. They are us citizens who spend their summers here and were planning to come next month.

The kids enjoyed the day off of school yesterday but today there were explosions from drones above the city. Feels like things are spiraling.

Hope it all gets resolved quickly and peacefully.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kashmir is the most beautiful place I have ever visited. The people were very kind but shy around tourists.

So sad that they have suffered so much and been used as pawns by both sides.

What do the Kashmiri people desire? Do they wish to continue to be occupied by India in one the most militarized regions in the entire world?

There is one soldier for six Kashmiris, totaling 100,000 soldiers. And Modi has revoked Kashmir's constitutional autonomy.

Large numbers of Kashmiri people in both Indian and Pakistan controlled regions want independence. They don't want to be a part of either country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorism

Bun Laden was openly living there, for crying out loud.

Not sure I'd describe his living conditions as open during his time there

He was living in a heavily fortified, custom built complex half a mile away from Pakistan's military academy. And he was living there with multiple wives, kids, and grandkids, as well as other associates. Apparently they were buying the best brands, fancy soaps and shampoos, and soda, among other things. It doesn't seem like a particularly closely guarded secret to me.

Anonymous wrote:Kashmir is the most beautiful place I have ever visited. The people were very kind but shy around tourists.

So sad that they have suffered so much and been used as pawns by both sides.

This

Anonymous wrote:Kashmir is the most beautiful place I have ever visited. The people were very kind but shy around tourists.

So sad that they have suffered so much and been used as pawns by both sides.

What do the Kashmiri people desire? Do they wish to continue to be occupied by India in one the most militarized regions in the entire world?

There is one soldier for six Kashmiris, totaling 100,000 soldiers. And Modi has revoked Kashmir's constitutional autonomy.

Kashmir is the most beautiful place I have ever visited. The people were very kind but shy around tourists.

So sad that they have suffered so much and been used as pawns by both sides.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorism

Bun Laden was openly living there, for crying out loud.

Not sure I'd describe his living conditions as open during his time there

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Pakistan is the one supporting terrorism.

Oh really? Yet somehow India has killed more than 100,000 Kashmiri civilians

Cite?

Human Rights Violations-Kashmir Media Service.

https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mwjhr-2020-0017/html?lang=en

Propaganda.

Human Rights Watch has reported that over 50,000 people were killed in Kashmir from 1989 to 2006.

https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-watch-kashmir-india-2023

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Pakistan is the one supporting terrorism.

Oh really? Yet somehow India has killed more than 100,000 Kashmiri civilians

Cite?

Human Rights Violations-Kashmir Media Service.

https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mwjhr-2020-0017/html?lang=en

Propaganda.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Pakistan is the one supporting terrorism.

Oh really? Yet somehow India has killed more than 100,000 Kashmiri civilians

Cite?

Human Rights Violations-Kashmir Media Service.

https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mwjhr-2020-0017/html?lang=en

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorism

Pakistan admits it was just doing the dirty work of the US government for the past 3 decades. No surprise given the US and it's long history of outsourcing terrorism

https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/1915547701644763166

To no one's surprise ever. Didn't expect him to be so open about it though

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorism

Bun Laden was openly living there, for crying out loud.