Anonymous wrote:Can you guys not see that leaping to the defense of how super smart and incredibly hard working your adult children are is part of the coddling? And not just them, but all their classmates and members of their university’s athletic league?
The call is coming from inside the house, gals.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is at a HYPSM and working their butt off. No coddling there. Demanding academics!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re all so dumb and coddled and companies don’t want to hire them, then why do we have to have daily threads on Ivies. Enjoy your other schools and be good with it. No need to knock anyone else down if you’re content.
No one thinks they’re ALL dumb and coddled, but anyone who has been at an ivy or worked with many knows some are and that it’s exactly a man bites dog story.
The Andy Bernard character on office was funny because it resonated wrt to a subset of ivy grads not because it was outlandish.
Anonymous wrote:If they’re all so dumb and coddled and companies don’t want to hire them, then why do we have to have daily threads on Ivies. Enjoy your other schools and be good with it. No need to knock anyone else down if you’re content.
Anonymous wrote:Actually, if you look at the top feeders for tech and finance, it’s mostly public schools, or private schools that have rigor similar to elite publics like Berkeley and Michigan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish my kid was coddled more, not really, but that is so false. There may be some plush privates that do that but it’s not the Ivies. Most get humbled real quick and the expectations are very high. There is no hand holding.
I believe what they mean by coddled is the Ivies do not provide the full gamut of a real word education. For instance, you don’t have to be proactive to get your classes. If you’re struggling, they practically give your own personal tutor. You don’t get that in publics, at least not to that extent. You have to be responsible and get your classes early or they’ll run out of seats. If you’re struggling, they do have resources to help you but you have to seek out. And when you do, you might have to wait a couple hours for your turn (this is most common in lower division introductory courses. Upper division is much more intimate). So public school education is more relatable to the real world. No one’s gonna give you a job out there, you have to seek it out. If you’re struggling at your job, you’re pretty much on your own to figure it out. An IT person once said he could always tell what school someone went to. He said the private school people would call me to fix stuff that only took a reboot.
Anonymous wrote:Can you guys not see that leaping to the defense of how super smart and incredibly hard working your adult children are is part of the coddling? And not just them, but all their classmates and members of their university’s athletic league?
The call is coming from inside the house, gals.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't have anything to do with sour grapes. It's more of a reaction to the obsession with obtaining 'elite' credentials, especially when they are gatekept by obscure or questionable processes, and the extreme min/max optimized paths parents put their children through to obtain them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish my kid was coddled more, not really, but that is so false. There may be some plush privates that do that but it’s not the Ivies. Most get humbled real quick and the expectations are very high. There is no hand holding.
I believe what they mean by coddled is the Ivies do not provide the full gamut of a real word education. For instance, you don’t have to be proactive to get your classes. If you’re struggling, they practically give your own personal tutor. You don’t get that in publics, at least not to that extent. You have to be responsible and get your classes early or they’ll run out of seats. If you’re struggling, they do have resources to help you but you have to seek out. And when you do, you might have to wait a couple hours for your turn (this is most common in lower division introductory courses. Upper division is much more intimate). So public school education is more relatable to the real world. No one’s gonna give you a job out there, you have to seek it out. If you’re struggling at your job, you’re pretty much on your own to figure it out. An IT person once said he could always tell what school someone went to. He said the private school people would call me to fix stuff that only took a reboot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is disputing that there are super bright people at ivies, it’s more the idea that the dimwits there (and there are definitely plenty of dimwits there) are more capable than the top students at lot lots of other (less rich, less privileged) schools.
There are a much, much greater number of dimwits at non-Ivies...and more as you keep going down the rankings.
My brother was a complete idiot and on a full ride at an ~330 ranked university....between the 4 roommates they didn't have a 4.0 first quarter...didn't even pick their books up (that were paid for).
The liklihood of finding a dimwit is much greater not on an Ivy/T10/20 campus. These arguments are so stupid....everyone worked with that dumb Ivy grad...
look, I get it...we always make fun of our kid when he does something stupid...'Ivy grad' and joke about it with him.
But that misses the fact that there are so many schools in this county, many of them with crazy smart kids, though apparently not your brother.
I would pick a top 25% grad of a state flagship over a generic ivy grad any day of the week. (And that is backed up by my experience in professional school admissions.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is disputing that there are super bright people at ivies, it’s more the idea that the dimwits there (and there are definitely plenty of dimwits there) are more capable than the top students at lot lots of other (less rich, less privileged) schools.
There are a much, much greater number of dimwits at non-Ivies...and more as you keep going down the rankings.
My brother was a complete idiot and on a full ride at an ~330 ranked university....between the 4 roommates they didn't have a 4.0 first quarter...didn't even pick their books up (that were paid for).
The liklihood of finding a dimwit is much greater not on an Ivy/T10/20 campus. These arguments are so stupid....everyone worked with that dumb Ivy grad...
look, I get it...we always make fun of our kid when he does something stupid...'Ivy grad' and joke about it with him.
But that misses the fact that there are so many schools in this county, many of them with crazy smart kids, though apparently not your brother.
I would pick a top 25% grad of a state flagship over a generic ivy grad any day of the week. (And that is backed up by my experience in professional school admissions.)
I would interview the person, understand their skills, temperament and goals, and then determine whether they would add and align with the company culture for long-term success. I wouldn’t have preconceived notions on their undergrad and instead see who I met that day.