Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess we've got a "both sides" situation. What other companies will NY state restrict from doing business (for purely political reasons)? This isn't the right way to play. Innovative business models to save money are not welcome in NY state.


https://fortune.com/2025/04/28/elon-musk-tesl...rk-state-government/



Actually, sounds like they have only Tesla an examption so they are just putting Tesla in the same category as other manufacturers. This seems reasonable (why would Tesla have an exemption in the first place?). I mean, you can reasonably argue whether it’s a good rule or not, but it doesn’t seem wrong to treat Tesla like everyone else.

Look, the car dealership lobby (the dinosaur companies) have a chokehold on the politicians. Any new business model (and it can be for ANY product) could be locked out of business in a state because of this kind of lobbying. It hurts AMERICA because we cannot develop new models that are competitive. Any car company could decide to use Tesla's model for selling cars. Why should Tesla have to sell like other manufacturers? It is not reasonable at all. Do you want to continue to pay too much for your car? Tesla is not like everyone else. EV cars do not need the same infrastructure as ICE cars. Why penalize them for not having it? I would not vote for that governor if I lived in NY.

Rivian has the same model for selling EVs.

Every car maker has EV cars along with ICE and hybrid. Tesla which is currently failing shouldn’t be given special favors.

Go buy a Tesla in Texas and drive it wherever you want. Maybe Texas doesn't care if musk screws over Texans, but New York intends to push back.

You can’t buy a Tesla in Texas. It has to be bought in another state and shipped in

I don't know what loser States make it easy to buy a Teslas but go buy one in one of those States.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Most liberals want EVs. Cleaner vehicles and better for the climate. New York governor is not going the right direction.


Tesla has not changed its technology in 10 years. There are much better EVs that cost half as much as a Tesla. Why buy a model T for twice the price?


Exactly. Aside from Leon being a garbage human being, Tesla is a garbage company. They make meh EVs with poor build quality. FSD is never coming from Telsa. There are tons of better EVs out there without the tarnished brand and image. It’s a meme stock company with an insult stupid valuation that can’t decide what it’s going to be, but it ends up being bad at all of the things it tries.

No there are not. Maybe the BYD? They are building tons I suppose.

People in DC are acting out of anger these days and I certainly understand that. But emotions are different from data and rationalization. The data on Tesla cars is pretty good. They have sold a lot of them (I think it was 1.9 million last year). They will continue to sell . . . have you driven the 2025 Y? It's a great car. Tesla is working on cars that will be less expensive as well. They are definitely not low quality cars. But I understand you are angry with Musk. He isn't the one making the cars. The people who design and build Teslas are doing a very good job. Some have been poached by other companies, but there is enough good talent still there.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Most liberals want EVs. Cleaner vehicles and better for the climate. New York governor is not going the right direction.


Tesla has not changed its technology in 10 years. There are much better EVs that cost half as much as a Tesla. Why buy a model T for twice the price?


Exactly. Aside from Leon being a garbage human being, Tesla is a garbage company. They make meh EVs with poor build quality. FSD is never coming from Telsa. There are tons of better EVs out there without the tarnished brand and image. It’s a meme stock company with an insult stupid valuation that can’t decide what it’s going to be, but it ends up being bad at all of the things it tries.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how for some posters here the only businesses being hurt that you care about are Elon's.

As if Trump isn't hurting tons of American businesses.

I hope you idiots are at least getting paid by Elon to be hypocritical frauds.

Haha. Elon has managed to destroy his own brand all by himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Most liberals want EVs. Cleaner vehicles and better for the climate. New York governor is not going the right direction.

Tesla has not changed its technology in 10 years. There are much better EVs that cost half as much as a Tesla. Why buy a model T for twice the price?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess we've got a "both sides" situation. What other companies will NY state restrict from doing business (for purely political reasons)? This isn't the right way to play. Innovative business models to save money are not welcome in NY state.


https://fortune.com/2025/04/28/elon-musk-tesl...rk-state-government/



Actually, sounds like they have only Tesla an examption so they are just putting Tesla in the same category as other manufacturers. This seems reasonable (why would Tesla have an exemption in the first place?). I mean, you can reasonably argue whether it’s a good rule or not, but it doesn’t seem wrong to treat Tesla like everyone else.

Look, the car dealership lobby (the dinosaur companies) have a chokehold on the politicians. Any new business model (and it can be for ANY product) could be locked out of business in a state because of this kind of lobbying. It hurts AMERICA because we cannot develop new models that are competitive. Any car company could decide to use Tesla's model for selling cars. Why should Tesla have to sell like other manufacturers? It is not reasonable at all. Do you want to continue to pay too much for your car? Tesla is not like everyone else. EV cars do not need the same infrastructure as ICE cars. Why penalize them for not having it? I would not vote for that governor if I lived in NY.

Rivian has the same model for selling EVs.

Every car maker has EV cars along with ICE and hybrid. Tesla which is currently failing shouldn’t be given special favors.

Go buy a Tesla in Texas and drive it wherever you want. Maybe Texas doesn't care if musk screws over Texans, but New York intends to push back.

You can’t buy a Tesla in Texas. It has to be bought in another state and shipped in

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess we've got a "both sides" situation. What other companies will NY state restrict from doing business (for purely political reasons)? This isn't the right way to play. Innovative business models to save money are not welcome in NY state.


https://fortune.com/2025/04/28/elon-musk-tesl...rk-state-government/



Actually, sounds like they have only Tesla an examption so they are just putting Tesla in the same category as other manufacturers. This seems reasonable (why would Tesla have an exemption in the first place?). I mean, you can reasonably argue whether it’s a good rule or not, but it doesn’t seem wrong to treat Tesla like everyone else.

Look, the car dealership lobby (the dinosaur companies) have a chokehold on the politicians. Any new business model (and it can be for ANY product) could be locked out of business in a state because of this kind of lobbying. It hurts AMERICA because we cannot develop new models that are competitive. Any car company could decide to use Tesla's model for selling cars. Why should Tesla have to sell like other manufacturers? It is not reasonable at all. Do you want to continue to pay too much for your car? Tesla is not like everyone else. EV cars do not need the same infrastructure as ICE cars. Why penalize them for not having it? I would not vote for that governor if I lived in NY.

Rivian has the same model for selling EVs.

Every car maker has EV cars along with ICE and hybrid. Tesla which is currently failing shouldn’t be given special favors.

Go buy a Tesla in Texas and drive it wherever you want. Maybe Texas doesn't care if musk screws over Texans, but New York intends to push back.

Anonymous wrote:

States rights right?

Whack a doodle conservatives said states should have absolute control over stuff like abortion, vaccines, abortion pills, etc. Why not over EVs too? This is just a different form of states' rights. If states are able to ban federally approved mrna vaccines, then other states should be allowed to ban EVs. No different. Conservatives are the ones who want to destroy interstate commerce and the power of the federal govt to unite the country. Give it to em.

Elon had nothing to do with abortion, vaccines, abortion pills, etc. And Elon is totally against the tariffs. Elon made a huge mistake with DOGE, yes. But Tesla is a good company and striking out against it is not going to help with all that stuff (abortion, vaccines, abortion pills). You need to protest in front of the representatives in Congress. Elon cannot change them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess we've got a "both sides" situation. What other companies will NY state restrict from doing business (for purely political reasons)? This isn't the right way to play. Innovative business models to save money are not welcome in NY state.


https://fortune.com/2025/04/28/elon-musk-tesl...rk-state-government/



Actually, sounds like they have only Tesla an examption so they are just putting Tesla in the same category as other manufacturers. This seems reasonable (why would Tesla have an exemption in the first place?). I mean, you can reasonably argue whether it’s a good rule or not, but it doesn’t seem wrong to treat Tesla like everyone else.

Look, the car dealership lobby (the dinosaur companies) have a chokehold on the politicians. Any new business model (and it can be for ANY product) could be locked out of business in a state because of this kind of lobbying. It hurts AMERICA because we cannot develop new models that are competitive. Any car company could decide to use Tesla's model for selling cars. Why should Tesla have to sell like other manufacturers? It is not reasonable at all. Do you want to continue to pay too much for your car? Tesla is not like everyone else. EV cars do not need the same infrastructure as ICE cars. Why penalize them for not having it? I would not vote for that governor if I lived in NY.

Rivian has the same model for selling EVs.

Every car maker has EV cars along with ICE and hybrid. Tesla which is currently failing shouldn’t be given special favors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
OP here. I vote Democratic, but this is too much government interference in individual choice and freedom. WTF. Do we want cheaper cars or not?

We have to balance many competing things - e.g., inexpensive prices for goods + business opportunities for Americans + reasonable working conditions & pay.

One could argue that the desire for cheap prices at the expense of American jobs heavily contributed to the loss of manufacturing, which contributed to the anger and resentment that middle America has, which brought us MAGA.

Possibly. But we were losing manufacturing jobs because of Unions.


I know , I know that is sacrilege, And the companies may have moved manufacturing out of the country anyways. But maybe not as quick and as early.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
OP here. I vote Democratic, but this is too much government interference in individual choice and freedom. WTF. Do we want cheaper cars or not?

We have to balance many competing things - e.g., inexpensive prices for goods + business opportunities for Americans + reasonable working conditions & pay.

One could argue that the desire for cheap prices at the expense of American jobs heavily contributed to the loss of manufacturing, which contributed to the anger and resentment that middle America has, which brought us MAGA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess we've got a "both sides" situation. What other companies will NY state restrict from doing business (for purely political reasons)? This isn't the right way to play. Innovative business models to save money are not welcome in NY state.


https://fortune.com/2025/04/28/elon-musk-tesl...rk-state-government/



Actually, sounds like they have only Tesla an examption so they are just putting Tesla in the same category as other manufacturers. This seems reasonable (why would Tesla have an exemption in the first place?). I mean, you can reasonably argue whether it’s a good rule or not, but it doesn’t seem wrong to treat Tesla like everyone else.

Look, the car dealership lobby (the dinosaur companies) have a chokehold on the politicians. Any new business model (and it can be for ANY product) could be locked out of business in a state because of this kind of lobbying. It hurts AMERICA because we cannot develop new models that are competitive. Any car company could decide to use Tesla's model for selling cars. Why should Tesla have to sell like other manufacturers? It is not reasonable at all. Do you want to continue to pay too much for your car? Tesla is not like everyone else. EV cars do not need the same infrastructure as ICE cars. Why penalize them for not having it? I would not vote for that governor if I lived in NY.

Rivian has the same model for selling EVs.

Anonymous wrote:
OP here. I vote Democratic, but this is too much government interference in individual choice and freedom. WTF. Do we want cheaper cars or not?

Anonymous wrote:
Most liberals want EVs. Cleaner vehicles and better for the climate. New York governor is not going the right direction.

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how for some posters here the only businesses being hurt that you care about are Elon's.

As if Trump isn't hurting tons of American businesses.

I hope you idiots are at least getting paid by Elon to be hypocritical frauds.