Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read an interview where they said a nanny brings in the kids to see them for a set amount of time each morning, and then whisks them away.

I believe it. Both are very busy and neither one seems like they care enough to be super hands on when they do have time. A very stereotypical rich workaholic family dynamic.

No, in a stereotypically rich family, the wife does not have a high powered career.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think people realize how serious her career is and how many extremely high powered people and regimes she fights. She's a brilliant human rights lawyer and she's a dual Lebanese-UK citizen. She's a visiting professor at Oxford right now.

It makes a lot of sense that she and the children would stay in the UK now. I suspect George will join them soon.

Does she have a personal army that she can deploy to uphold the judgements she obtains? Has she defeated Chinese humans rights violators?

What point are you making here? How is this responsive to the idea that her life work and her identity make the US potentially extremely unsafe for her and her children right now? Their dad is also a vocal critic of the government. They already had valid security concerns. That and the fact that she is a visiting professor at Oxford are much more likely explanations for basing in the UK right now than fantasies about him being gay.

The point I am making that practicing “human rights law” is a bunch of hype and that it sounds much more important than it is. She could use her time much more productively doing other things.

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d say this but he’s not aging well. He’s only 63 but now looks late 70s.

I saw him in person last summer.

He looked so great.

You should pray to look like him at 63!

This article was totally different from what I expected. They're not living separate lives, they are doing what they have to do because of their careers. I didn't get divorce from this at all. You are delusional, OP. Learn how to read.

The delulu in this thread is strong.

Amal had zero reason to bother with Clooney. She had a successful, full life before he came along. Only a love match on her side makes sense. He was a very successful aging bachelor whom most people thought would never marry, and he could have stuck to that. So in my opinion, only genuine emotion would’ve motivated him to marry her.
People are jealous haters and it’s bizarre how hard people work to find an alternative explanation. Even if they live separately or ultimately divorce, it doesn’t mean theirs wasn’t a love match.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d say this but he’s not aging well. He’s only 63 but now looks late 70s.

He looks good to me!

George is quite wrinkly.

Anonymous wrote:InTouch Weekly? Really credible source there.

This. In Touch Weekly is creative writing. Pure fiction.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was always something so shady about George, and his relationship with Amal alays seemed weird. I also found it funny that the media made it out to be "OMG, lucky Amal, what a fairytale!" When George was like 50+, way older than her, looking pretty haggard compared to his youth, and she was a successful lawyer in London. The whole thing was just very strange and off to me, like a PR stunt

Agree.

That plus his non stop political endorsements make one wonder what they have on him.

You think that George Clooney, a megawatt movie star and very successful businessman, was blackmailed into marrying his wife and speaking out politically? His family have been active dems in Kentucky forever, and he has been outspoken throughout his career. Did they start blackmailing him in the womb?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s because he’s gay.

Gay fantasizer, who thinks all attractive homosexual men are secretly gay, has entered the chat.

Yes, all attractive homosexual men are indeed gay. No fantasy needed just fact.

Anonymous wrote:There was always something so shady about George, and his relationship with Amal alays seemed weird. I also found it funny that the media made it out to be "OMG, lucky Amal, what a fairytale!" When George was like 50+, way older than her, looking pretty haggard compared to his youth, and she was a successful lawyer in London. The whole thing was just very strange and off to me, like a PR stunt

I didn't think it was pr stunt persay but I definitely don't think their union was created out of love.

Anonymous wrote:There was always something so shady about George, and his relationship with Amal alays seemed weird. I also found it funny that the media made it out to be "OMG, lucky Amal, what a fairytale!" When George was like 50+, way older than her, looking pretty haggard compared to his youth, and she was a successful lawyer in London. The whole thing was just very strange and off to me, like a PR stunt

Agree.

That plus his non stop political endorsements make one wonder what they have on him.

There was always something so shady about George, and his relationship with Amal alays seemed weird. I also found it funny that the media made it out to be "OMG, lucky Amal, what a fairytale!" When George was like 50+, way older than her, looking pretty haggard compared to his youth, and she was a successful lawyer in London. The whole thing was just very strange and off to me, like a PR stunt

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s because he’s gay.

Let’s say you’re right. Why hasn’t one male companion or fling come forward in 60 years?

Because they respect him. Not everyone is looking for a cash day. It happened frequently with old Hollywood stars. Their old gay flings would come once the star died.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you actually read the article and have the gift of comprehension, I know, I know, very few do, it said that she moved to NYC bcs he wanted to be with the family, but that they have separate jobs and interests and that is ok.
It could be that he has an interest in some other lover of any gender.
The truth is, I am not sure how she can even have a conversation with someone so insipid and uneducated.

Why do you think he's insipid and uneducated? Yes, I know he doesn't have formal education, but he never came across as particularly stupid. Although I will say I don't exactly follow him either.

He had a formal education including several years of college but didn’t graduate.

Exactly. These hags have no idea what they're talking about. I grew up in Cincinnati. Hid dad, Nick, was a beloved local broadcaster. George is well- versed on a number of issues. Some posters are so jealous that they need to tear anyone down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think people realize how serious her career is and how many extremely high powered people and regimes she fights. She's a brilliant human rights lawyer and she's a dual Lebanese-UK citizen. She's a visiting professor at Oxford right now.

It makes a lot of sense that she and the children would stay in the UK now. I suspect George will join them soon.

Does she have a personal army that she can deploy to uphold the judgements she obtains? Has she defeated Chinese humans rights violators?

What point are you making here? How is this responsive to the idea that her life work and her identity make the US potentially extremely unsafe for her and her children right now? Their dad is also a vocal critic of the government. They already had valid security concerns. That and the fact that she is a visiting professor at Oxford are much more likely explanations for basing in the UK right now than fantasies about him being gay.