Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 23:41     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think Andy Beshear president and AOC VP ticket would potentially be a winning combo.


Beshear has no name recognition nationwide.


Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were both relatively unknown shortly before they before won the Democratic nomination.

Sometimes being a stranger is an asset.


It is he the generational political talent they were?

Hmmm.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 23:40     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Would he run? Would he have any interest? Gosh I would vote for him in a heart beat and he resonates so much with me.

Van Hallon (P) and AOC (VP) my dream ticket.




Hmmm,

So Van Hollen is now your dream presidential candidate?

He goes to El Salvador to advocate the return or an MS-13 member who is also and illegal alien.

He does not go to Gaza to advocate for the release of actual US citizens from Hamas.


So why does this MS13 gang member deserve to be released more than US Citizens??


You are foolish op.



This has repeatedly been corrected. He was NOT an MS-13 member. The fact that you keep on saying it makes me think that you're a troll or just really really dumb.



Court said he was likely an MS13 gang member.



Even if he wasn’t, who cares.

He is here illegally.

His wife accused him of battery and abuse, filed a restraining order.

Good riddens.

You want people like that as your neighbor.


Bye.



I like people who are smart enough to spell “riddance” correctly.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 23:06     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

No, it’s Kamala for the win in 2028.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 18:52     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit


Pointing out neither were legal is not the flex you think it is. It just proves a point against illegals.

Since you are having trouble with comprehension, the statement was Van Hollen had a choice between 2 cases that happened in his home State. He could support the actual MD citizens whose daughter was murdered, OR support a non citizen.

As you pointed out, he chose the 2 non citizens….


Yea, that Senator sucks but he's a Saint next to Trump


So? This thread is about him, not Trump.


Do you get that to people who are not racist, this makes zero sense? The killer has been convicted and Van Hollen supports that conviction. The fact he is advocating for due process rights for a different man (and by extension, for everyone who ICE interacts with) has literally nothing to do with that case.

Clearly the GOP is no longer the party of small government. These a holes just want government to have more power to kidnap their opponents and send them to concentration camps.

Anyway you know all this which is why you are sh$t posting about Van Hollen. He'd make an excellent candidate.


A smart person considering running for President would know that going to another country to defend someone here illegally, and a wife beater is a dumb idea. It’s going to turn many people off. I hope he runs, because the photo of him in ark Salvador with the word "Traitor" on it will be everywhere, and he will lose. No matter what politics you believe in, it was a dumb move.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 18:01     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit


Pointing out neither were legal is not the flex you think it is. It just proves a point against illegals.

Since you are having trouble with comprehension, the statement was Van Hollen had a choice between 2 cases that happened in his home State. He could support the actual MD citizens whose daughter was murdered, OR support a non citizen.

As you pointed out, he chose the 2 non citizens….


Yea, that Senator sucks but he's a Saint next to Trump


So? This thread is about him, not Trump.

Every breath taken by a Democrat, IS about Trump. Poor things, they’re doomed. AOC will show them.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 16:41     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit


Pointing out neither were legal is not the flex you think it is. It just proves a point against illegals.

Since you are having trouble with comprehension, the statement was Van Hollen had a choice between 2 cases that happened in his home State. He could support the actual MD citizens whose daughter was murdered, OR support a non citizen.

As you pointed out, he chose the 2 non citizens….


Yea, that Senator sucks but he's a Saint next to Trump


So? This thread is about him, not Trump.


Do you get that to people who are not racist, this makes zero sense? The killer has been convicted and Van Hollen supports that conviction. The fact he is advocating for due process rights for a different man (and by extension, for everyone who ICE interacts with) has literally nothing to do with that case.

Clearly the GOP is no longer the party of small government. These a holes just want government to have more power to kidnap their opponents and send them to concentration camps.

Anyway you know all this which is why you are sh$t posting about Van Hollen. He'd make an excellent candidate.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 15:37     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit


Pointing out neither were legal is not the flex you think it is. It just proves a point against illegals.

Since you are having trouble with comprehension, the statement was Van Hollen had a choice between 2 cases that happened in his home State. He could support the actual MD citizens whose daughter was murdered, OR support a non citizen.

As you pointed out, he chose the 2 non citizens….


Yea, that Senator sucks but he's a Saint next to Trump


So? This thread is about him, not Trump.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 15:28     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit


Pointing out neither were legal is not the flex you think it is. It just proves a point against illegals.

Since you are having trouble with comprehension, the statement was Van Hollen had a choice between 2 cases that happened in his home State. He could support the actual MD citizens whose daughter was murdered, OR support a non citizen.

As you pointed out, he chose the 2 non citizens….


Yea, that Senator sucks but he's a Saint next to Trump
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 15:11     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit


Pointing out neither were legal is not the flex you think it is. It just proves a point against illegals.

Since you are having trouble with comprehension, the statement was Van Hollen had a choice between 2 cases that happened in his home State. He could support the actual MD citizens whose daughter was murdered, OR support a non citizen.

As you pointed out, he chose the 2 non citizens….
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 14:43     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?


Neither El Salvadoran are citizens dim wit
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 14:40     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.


The family of the murdered woman are not citizens?
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 14:03     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.


Neither are citizens. Try harder.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 13:58     Subject: Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typical playbook, can’t defend the guy this thread is about, start saying "what about Trump". It’s sad.


I hope you apply that same standard to MAGA efforts to conflate the case of Abrego Garcia with that of the man who viciously murdered Rachel Morin.


The cases are different, but comparing the actions of Van Hollen between the 2 is fair. They both happened in MD and he threw his support behind the non MD citizen vs the actual MD citizen. It’s very telling, and a foolish move.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 12:48     Subject: Re:Van Hollen 2028?

Anonymous wrote:


Wrong! Obama didn't put up with MS-13 garbage.
Anonymous
Post 04/19/2025 12:39     Subject: Re:Van Hollen 2028?