Anonymous wrote:To PP above - correct - Vandy not a target likely for anyone, regardless of stats
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Vanderbilt
Any of the SEC schools for OOS kids
NYU
USC (when I took the SATs they were doing the stuff Chicago does now- sending the biggest and most mailings of anyone and generally acting desperate)
Nope. Vanderbilt has been competitive and difficult to get into for a long time.
+1 There's considerable ignorance (and prejudice) showing up in this thread. No surprise, given it's DCUM.
Yes, but in the 90s it was not nearly as competitive or difficult to get into as it is now.
Back then, Vandy was a full step down from Duke - a likely/target for high stat kids who were reaching for Duke.
Now, that gap is much narrower. My understanding is that no one can consider Vandy a likely/target at this point.
Which is disappointing. The two schools are similar in many ways (midsized + highly academic/research schools + high-profile D1 sports + work hard/play hard vibe) and there are few likelies/targets that fit that exact profile, even for kids with 4.0/12 APs/1500+/strong ECs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Vanderbilt
Any of the SEC schools for OOS kids
NYU
USC (when I took the SATs they were doing the stuff Chicago does now- sending the biggest and most mailings of anyone and generally acting desperate)
Nope. Vanderbilt has been competitive and difficult to get into for a long time.
+1 There's considerable ignorance (and prejudice) showing up in this thread. No surprise, given it's DCUM.
Yes, but in the 90s it was not nearly as competitive or difficult to get into as it is now.
Back then, Vandy was a full step down from Duke - a likely/target for high stat kids who were reaching for Duke.
Now, that gap is much narrower. My understanding is that no one can consider Vandy a likely/target at this point.
Which is disappointing. The two schools are similar in many ways (midsized + highly academic/research schools + high-profile D1 sports + work hard/play hard vibe) and there are few likelies/targets that fit that exact profile, even for kids with 4.0/12 APs/1500+/strong ECs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I graduated college in the 90s. USNWR rankings existed but I don't know anyone who was really aware of them. This was pre-internet so you would need to buy the magazine or go to the library. Pretty much everybody went to a public college except one who went to West Point and one to Princeton.
https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2023/10/09/vanderbilts-criticism-us-news-tone-deaf-opinion
"Vanderbilt is in some ways a victim of its own success. It is among a group of nouveau riche institutions that have become dramatically more selective over the past 30 years. In the 1990s, Vanderbilt admitted 65 percent of its applicants (per, ironically, the 1993 edition of the U.S. News ranking), whereas today that number is under 10 percent. Is Vanderbilt that much better today? Probably not. Has that success led to institutional hubris? Perhaps."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Vanderbilt
Any of the SEC schools for OOS kids
NYU
USC (when I took the SATs they were doing the stuff Chicago does now- sending the biggest and most mailings of anyone and generally acting desperate)
Nope. Vanderbilt has been competitive and difficult to get into for a long time.
+1 There's considerable ignorance (and prejudice) showing up in this thread. No surprise, given it's DCUM.