Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The sad thing is that a lot of this was devised by pro-Israel businessmen who donate to both the GOP and Dems. Look up the Canary Mission - they have provided a list of people they want Trump to deport or imprison. This woman was on their hit list for writing an op-Ed in the student newspaper.
Here’s their hit list article on her:
https://canarymission.org/individual/Rumeysa_Ozturk
That’s terrifying. They have students, professors, medical professionals. WTF. Is anyone in the media talking about this organization?
And if you click on certain random names, the crime of the person is that he/she participated in anti-Israel protests.
Many thousands participated in these protests. Among them are many foreign nationals who weren't even GC holders likely. How come they aren't all getting arrested en masse if protesting against Israel is suddenly a crime? Could there possibly be other intel they had on these specific people that they were singled out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The sad thing is that a lot of this was devised by pro-Israel businessmen who donate to both the GOP and Dems. Look up the Canary Mission - they have provided a list of people they want Trump to deport or imprison. This woman was on their hit list for writing an op-Ed in the student newspaper.
Here’s their hit list article on her:
https://canarymission.org/individual/Rumeysa_Ozturk
That’s terrifying. They have students, professors, medical professionals. WTF. Is anyone in the media talking about this organization?
And if you click on certain random names, the crime of the person is that he/she participated in anti-Israel protests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lesson here is that non-citizens express their politics at their own risk. They have no absolute rights to say whatever they want, and the government has the absolute right to revoke permission for them to be here. That conduct presently unacceptable to the government has been tolerated in the past has no bearing on whether it can, should, or will be tolerated in the future.
Turkish and Chinese students can go home and say whatever they want to about U.S. or their own country's foreign policies. Their home governments may or may not tolerate them doing so. I suspect they'd be much more circumspect at home than they have been here.
It's disgusting that you're trying to justify this. Everyone has absolute rights. That's what this country was founded on.
Non-citizens do not have absolute rights, simple legal reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One of the more depressing things about Trump 2.0 is watching people wrap themselves in the flag while simultaneously destroying everything that flag stands for. Some of you are truly disgusting.
The main thing the flag represents is that the US is a sovereign country. That means we are allowed to choose what foreigners enter and stay in the country.
You come as a student, do your studies and don’t protest the government that allowed you entry. It really is that simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my goodness. MAGA, I know you don’t understand things until they happen to you, so lets pretend 3 years from now Trump is gone, and every non-citizen who ever expressed support for Trump, DOGE, MAGA, or the GOP has been rounded up on suspicion of anti-American activities and has been sent to wherever to await their fate.
Are you good with that?
Because if you’re not good with that, you shouldn’t be good with this.
That has already happened. The military and law enforcement under Biden removed people with suspected MAGA sympathies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my goodness. MAGA, I know you don’t understand things until they happen to you, so lets pretend 3 years from now Trump is gone, and every non-citizen who ever expressed support for Trump, DOGE, MAGA, or the GOP has been rounded up on suspicion of anti-American activities and has been sent to wherever to await their fate.
Are you good with that?
Because if you’re not good with that, you shouldn’t be good with this.
That has already happened. The military and law enforcement under Biden removed people with suspected MAGA sympathies.
You need to come up with an objective source. If you can't, you are just another blathering idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One of the more depressing things about Trump 2.0 is watching people wrap themselves in the flag while simultaneously destroying everything that flag stands for. Some of you are truly disgusting.
The main thing the flag represents is that the US is a sovereign country. That means we are allowed to choose what foreigners enter and stay in the country.
You come as a student, do your studies and don’t protest the government that allowed you entry. It really is that simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One of the more depressing things about Trump 2.0 is watching people wrap themselves in the flag while simultaneously destroying everything that flag stands for. Some of you are truly disgusting.
The main thing the flag represents is that the US is a sovereign country. That means we are allowed to choose what foreigners enter and stay in the country.
You come as a student, do your studies and don’t protest the government that allowed you entry. It really is that simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamas does not just want to destroy the Jewish state, but to kill all Jews.
I guess I’ll have to take you at your word because I’m not obsessed with Hamas (or boogeymen of any stripe, I guess).
However, in no part of this world is that purported aim even within a moonshot of being an actual danger, right? In fact, as we’ve all seen just these past two years or so, the body count disparity in this conflict really makes your statement seem silly and probably disingenuous.
Pointedly, members of which group are more at risk of death from members of the other group, based on the actual body count?
Now … do you see why people tend to roll their eyes with these existential threat claims you make to justify the actions of the group you favor?
Take Hamas at their word. It is literally the underpinning of their entire reason for existing. It's in preamble to their charter: Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious. It needs all sincere efforts. It is a step that inevitably should be followed by other steps. The Movement is but one squadron that should be supported by more and more squadrons from this vast Arab and Islamic world, until the enemy is vanquished and Allah's victory is realised.
Counting bodies is a perverse way to decide which side is just and moral. There is simply no equivalence between a group dedicated to the destruction of the adherents to another religion, and the exercise of defense against that obscene objective.
Anonymous wrote:One of the more depressing things about Trump 2.0 is watching people wrap themselves in the flag while simultaneously destroying everything that flag stands for. Some of you are truly disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my goodness. MAGA, I know you don’t understand things until they happen to you, so lets pretend 3 years from now Trump is gone, and every non-citizen who ever expressed support for Trump, DOGE, MAGA, or the GOP has been rounded up on suspicion of anti-American activities and has been sent to wherever to await their fate.
Are you good with that?
Because if you’re not good with that, you shouldn’t be good with this.
That has already happened. The military and law enforcement under Biden removed people with suspected MAGA sympathies.
Anonymous wrote:Oh my goodness. MAGA, I know you don’t understand things until they happen to you, so lets pretend 3 years from now Trump is gone, and every non-citizen who ever expressed support for Trump, DOGE, MAGA, or the GOP has been rounded up on suspicion of anti-American activities and has been sent to wherever to await their fate.
Are you good with that?
Because if you’re not good with that, you shouldn’t be good with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamas does not just want to destroy the Jewish state, but to kill all Jews.
I guess I’ll have to take you at your word because I’m not obsessed with Hamas (or boogeymen of any stripe, I guess).
However, in no part of this world is that purported aim even within a moonshot of being an actual danger, right? In fact, as we’ve all seen just these past two years or so, the body count disparity in this conflict really makes your statement seem silly and probably disingenuous.
Pointedly, members of which group are more at risk of death from members of the other group, based on the actual body count?
Now … do you see why people tend to roll their eyes with these existential threat claims you make to justify the actions of the group you favor?