Anonymous wrote:Respectfully, OP it's LENT - the most holy season of our faith. I went to Catholic Schools in the Northeast (so, not the Arlington Diocese) and going to Mass every Friday, and then during a feast day, and then to Stations weekly during Lent was normal, and to be expected.
With regards to your complaint regarding instructional time - there is actually a lot to be learned by going to mass this frequently - among them patience, the ability to sit still and calm their mind, reverence, humility. These are all characteristics which many modern-day children (and adults) seem to lack lately, but which will serve them well in the long-run. I'd rather they learned and practiced this, than they learned to do busy work.
Finally, if your kid isn't getting the education you would like, that's on YOU. Move them, please. I have multiple kids there. They've all tested, without fail, high on those MAP tests, compared to the national average. And no, they're not naturally geniuses. So, clearly, the kids are learning SOMETHING there, compared to the rest of our nation. If your kids aren't learning enough, by your standards, move them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to work at SMS many years ago. It was not well run. Trust me, teachers do not like the constant disruptions as it makes their life really difficult. It was hard to get through the curriculum.
Also there were several students who would have been better served in a public school due to learning or behavioral differences. (This was before they went all in on inclusion.)
I am just repeating what everyone has said, but if you are this unhappy, you need to make it known to your family and/or the administration. However, you won't exact that much change. It is a school that is very set in its ways.
How’d they go all in on inclusion? (Other than pausing on announcing honor roll last year)?
The program for ids with intellectual disabilities was not in place but now those kids are all over social media. There certainly wasn't an inclusion week. Also the Honor Roll was published and a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to work at SMS many years ago. It was not well run. Trust me, teachers do not like the constant disruptions as it makes their life really difficult. It was hard to get through the curriculum.
Also there were several students who would have been better served in a public school due to learning or behavioral differences. (This was before they went all in on inclusion.)
I am just repeating what everyone has said, but if you are this unhappy, you need to make it known to your family and/or the administration. However, you won't exact that much change. It is a school that is very set in its ways.
How’d they go all in on inclusion? (Other than pausing on announcing honor roll last year)?
The program for ids with intellectual disabilities was not in place but now those kids are all over social media. There certainly wasn't an inclusion week. Also the Honor Roll was published and a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to work at SMS many years ago. It was not well run. Trust me, teachers do not like the constant disruptions as it makes their life really difficult. It was hard to get through the curriculum.
Also there were several students who would have been better served in a public school due to learning or behavioral differences. (This was before they went all in on inclusion.)
I am just repeating what everyone has said, but if you are this unhappy, you need to make it known to your family and/or the administration. However, you won't exact that much change. It is a school that is very set in its ways.
How’d they go all in on inclusion? (Other than pausing on announcing honor roll last year)?
The program for ids with intellectual disabilities was not in place but now those kids are all over social media. There certainly wasn't an inclusion week. Also the Honor Roll was published and a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to work at SMS many years ago. It was not well run. Trust me, teachers do not like the constant disruptions as it makes their life really difficult. It was hard to get through the curriculum.
Also there were several students who would have been better served in a public school due to learning or behavioral differences. (This was before they went all in on inclusion.)
I am just repeating what everyone has said, but if you are this unhappy, you need to make it known to your family and/or the administration. However, you won't exact that much change. It is a school that is very set in its ways.
How’d they go all in on inclusion? (Other than pausing on announcing honor roll last year)?
Anonymous wrote:I used to work at SMS many years ago. It was not well run. Trust me, teachers do not like the constant disruptions as it makes their life really difficult. It was hard to get through the curriculum.
Also there were several students who would have been better served in a public school due to learning or behavioral differences. (This was before they went all in on inclusion.)
I am just repeating what everyone has said, but if you are this unhappy, you need to make it known to your family and/or the administration. However, you won't exact that much change. It is a school that is very set in its ways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s once a year — get over it or leave catholic school.
It’s not once a year. It’s multiple weeks a year. There’s always some random “feast” (that most Catholics I know have never heard of) as an excuse to not have class. I grew up Catholic and went to a catholic school through HS — never heard of all these feasts and special days! Is this diocese the only one that recognizes them?
Then, on top of the random feasts, now we have Inclusion Week, Bullying Week, etc etc. — each with special assemblies that take time from academics.
How about MATH week? Can we start that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe OP secretly doesn't want St. Mary's to get bigger and regularly posts these threads to discourage others from applying.
Or like someone else said, wants to leave but spouse and kid(s) disagree.
Instead of the idiotic, irrelevant passive aggressive, ad hominem attacks, why don’t you tell me: How much classroom time is appropriate? How much mass is too much? I get the sense that some parents would be fine with mass 5x a week.
I also get the sense that some parents don’t care about or emphasize academics bc their kids aren’t very good at academics, so it’s better for them to dilute what they’re not good at.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe OP secretly doesn't want St. Mary's to get bigger and regularly posts these threads to discourage others from applying.
Or like someone else said, wants to leave but spouse and kid(s) disagree.
Instead of the idiotic, irrelevant passive aggressive, ad hominem attacks, why don’t you tell me: How much classroom time is appropriate? How much mass is too much? I get the sense that some parents would be fine with mass 5x a week.
I also get the sense that some parents don’t care about or emphasize academics bc their kids aren’t very good at academics, so it’s better for them to dilute what they’re not good at.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe OP secretly doesn't want St. Mary's to get bigger and regularly posts these threads to discourage others from applying.
Or like someone else said, wants to leave but spouse and kid(s) disagree.
Instead of the idiotic, irrelevant passive aggressive, ad hominem attacks, why don’t you tell me: How much classroom time is appropriate? How much mass is too much? I get the sense that some parents would be fine with mass 5x a week.
I also get the sense that some parents don’t care about or emphasize academics bc their kids aren’t very good at academics, so it’s better for them to dilute what they’re not good at.