Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my club (non Academy) the first teams play MLSN1.
Now, second teams have been invited to join MLSN2.
If MLSN2 plays SY, then I see impossible that MLSN 1 remains BY.
It’s absolutely infeasible keeping two different age systems (BY/SY) inside the same club.
So 1 would change to benefit 2?
Where does the top league change to accommodate lower leagues in any sport?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my club (non Academy) the first teams play MLSN1.
Now, second teams have been invited to join MLSN2.
If MLSN2 plays SY, then I see impossible that MLSN 1 remains BY.
It’s absolutely infeasible keeping two different age systems (BY/SY) inside the same club.
So 1 would change to benefit 2?
Where does the top league change to accommodate lower leagues in any sport?
Yes, changing to SY with everyone else will benefit both of them. You see MLSN doesn't have any aversion to changing to SY, they don't take things personally, it's a business.
and you represent MLS Next in what official professional capacity that we should take your statement as factual from the organization?
What? This is an anonymous public message board, no one is taking anyone seriously on here lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my club (non Academy) the first teams play MLSN1.
Now, second teams have been invited to join MLSN2.
If MLSN2 plays SY, then I see impossible that MLSN 1 remains BY.
It’s absolutely infeasible keeping two different age systems (BY/SY) inside the same club.
So 1 would change to benefit 2?
Where does the top league change to accommodate lower leagues in any sport?
Yes, changing to SY with everyone else will benefit both of them. You see MLSN doesn't have any aversion to changing to SY, they don't take things personally, it's a business.
and you represent MLS Next in what official professional capacity that we should take your statement as factual from the organization?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my club (non Academy) the first teams play MLSN1.
Now, second teams have been invited to join MLSN2.
If MLSN2 plays SY, then I see impossible that MLSN 1 remains BY.
It’s absolutely infeasible keeping two different age systems (BY/SY) inside the same club.
So 1 would change to benefit 2?
Where does the top league change to accommodate lower leagues in any sport?
Yes, changing to SY with everyone else will benefit both of them. You see MLSN doesn't have any aversion to changing to SY, they don't take things personally, it's a business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my club (non Academy) the first teams play MLSN1.
Now, second teams have been invited to join MLSN2.
If MLSN2 plays SY, then I see impossible that MLSN 1 remains BY.
It’s absolutely infeasible keeping two different age systems (BY/SY) inside the same club.
So 1 would change to benefit 2?
Where does the top league change to accommodate lower leagues in any sport?
Anonymous wrote:Our top teams play MLS Next (boys) and GA (girls). Boys BY and girls SY? I don’t get it.
Anonymous wrote:At my club (non Academy) the first teams play MLSN1.
Now, second teams have been invited to join MLSN2.
If MLSN2 plays SY, then I see impossible that MLSN 1 remains BY.
It’s absolutely infeasible keeping two different age systems (BY/SY) inside the same club.
Anonymous wrote:There, that's what you are not seeing. Money is not in the leagues like MLSN, it in the teams. MLS knows this of course and needs to reach down and come up with schemes to get part of the bag.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thinking MLSN academies will 100% percent stay BY misunderstands their role in the market for MLS. They are low budget show to try to pretend to be a big boy club.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is still some minimal chance MLSN stays BY, albeit very unlikely. It seems the word has leaked that it is going SY, but there has still been no official announcement. However, there is a zero percent chance MLSN stays BY while MLSN2 goes SY. Many top clubs will have teams in both and it would be a logistical nightmare to do that. MLSN would be writing their demise. Can't happen. Won't happen.
You must ask yourself an honest question: What advantage do those pay-to-play MLSN clubs still stay in BY alone? MLS Academy 100% will remain in BY, so do not confuse both as they hope so.
Explain how MLS Next is low budget and pretending to be the big boys?
Which youth league is higher budget and has bigger boys?
There, that's what you are not seeing. Money is not in the leagues like MLSN, it in the teams. MLS knows this of course and needs to reach down and come up with schemes to get part of the bag.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thinking MLSN academies will 100% percent stay BY misunderstands their role in the market for MLS. They are low budget show to try to pretend to be a big boy club.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is still some minimal chance MLSN stays BY, albeit very unlikely. It seems the word has leaked that it is going SY, but there has still been no official announcement. However, there is a zero percent chance MLSN stays BY while MLSN2 goes SY. Many top clubs will have teams in both and it would be a logistical nightmare to do that. MLSN would be writing their demise. Can't happen. Won't happen.
You must ask yourself an honest question: What advantage do those pay-to-play MLSN clubs still stay in BY alone? MLS Academy 100% will remain in BY, so do not confuse both as they hope so.
Explain how MLS Next is low budget and pretending to be the big boys?
Which youth league is higher budget and has bigger boys?
Anonymous wrote:Thinking MLSN academies will 100% percent stay BY misunderstands their role in the market for MLS. They are low budget show to try to pretend to be a big boy club.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is still some minimal chance MLSN stays BY, albeit very unlikely. It seems the word has leaked that it is going SY, but there has still been no official announcement. However, there is a zero percent chance MLSN stays BY while MLSN2 goes SY. Many top clubs will have teams in both and it would be a logistical nightmare to do that. MLSN would be writing their demise. Can't happen. Won't happen.
You must ask yourself an honest question: What advantage do those pay-to-play MLSN clubs still stay in BY alone? MLS Academy 100% will remain in BY, so do not confuse both as they hope so.
Anonymous wrote:Thinking MLSN academies will 100% percent stay BY misunderstands their role in the market for MLS. They are low budget show to try to pretend to be a big boy club.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is still some minimal chance MLSN stays BY, albeit very unlikely. It seems the word has leaked that it is going SY, but there has still been no official announcement. However, there is a zero percent chance MLSN stays BY while MLSN2 goes SY. Many top clubs will have teams in both and it would be a logistical nightmare to do that. MLSN would be writing their demise. Can't happen. Won't happen.
You must ask yourself an honest question: What advantage do those pay-to-play MLSN clubs still stay in BY alone? MLS Academy 100% will remain in BY, so do not confuse both as they hope so.
Thinking MLSN academies will 100% percent stay BY misunderstands their role in the market for MLS. They are low budget show to try to pretend to be a big boy club.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is still some minimal chance MLSN stays BY, albeit very unlikely. It seems the word has leaked that it is going SY, but there has still been no official announcement. However, there is a zero percent chance MLSN stays BY while MLSN2 goes SY. Many top clubs will have teams in both and it would be a logistical nightmare to do that. MLSN would be writing their demise. Can't happen. Won't happen.
You must ask yourself an honest question: What advantage do those pay-to-play MLSN clubs still stay in BY alone? MLS Academy 100% will remain in BY, so do not confuse both as they hope so.