leaflets dropped by israel govt onto gaza

To the honorable people of Gaza

Following the events that have taken place, the temporary ceasefire, and before the implementation of Trump's coercive plan, which will force you to flee, whether you like it or not, we have decided to make a final appeal to anyone who wants us to provide assistance and who agrees to help us in return. We will not hesitate for a moment to help.

Reassess yourselves. The map of the world will not change if all the people of Gaza disappear. No one will notice you or ask about you. You will remain alone in your inevitable fate. Iran cannot protect itself, let alone protect you. You have seen with your own eyes what has happened. Neither America nor Europe cares about Gaza at all, nor do your Arab countries, which are now our allies and provide us with money, oil, and weapons, while they send you shrouds. Only a little remains, and the game is over.

Whoever wants to win before it's too late, we are here to remain until Judgment Day.

For history, not for you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel sucks.
Palestine sucks.
Hamas sucks the most, but they all suck.

They will continue killing each other until they are all dead. The idea that there are “good” and “bad” players in that war is an illusion.

You try to twist the facts so you can find a “good” side. You end up justifying children being murdered (“their parent was Hamas and using them as a human shield” OR “their parent is a colonizer who has abused Palestinians for decades, they’re acceptable collateral damage.”)

There’s no good side here.

Actually, there is. There is good and there is evil. The good side stays within its borders and doesn't launch terror raids into neighboring territory. The evil side engages in terror repeatedly over 75 or so years after losing a war they started. The evil side loses every time, but that doesn't make them less evil, and doesn't make the side which defeats them in self-defense any the less morally good.

Oh just stop. Israel doesn't stay within its borders. It doesn't believe in borders that are internationally recognized. Does it include Gaza, the West Bank, Golan Heights, or the Syrian and Lebanese villages it is currently occupying?

Keep on calling it self-defense. The rest of the world doesn't believe that anymore.

+1. And I hate to say it, but any moral cover the Israelis had for genocide that may have been afforded by the Holocaust has long expired. Just hearing the rhetoric coming from them is making me sick. It’s clear they don’t think Gazans are humans. Wonder where I heard that crap before.

I don't even think that many Israelis are religiously observant. At this point it's just all about nationalism.

There's no "moral cover for genocide" because there is no genocide. There is a righteous war against terrorists and those who raise, doctrinate, support, and shelter them. It is an entirely legitimate war of self-defense, which could have ended in an instant if the hostages were released. Hostage-taking is not the conduct of people with any claim to morality or to immunity for the consequences of their activites.

You keep saying that, but no amount of wishing will make it true. How many thousands of lives is enough retribution for a single hostage? We’re like thousands to one at this point.

However many it takes until they're released is the answer. The power to stop the killing is within Hamas' control. They just choose to keep trying to extort concessions at the expense of their own people, whom they apparently see as completely expendable. If they don't value those lives, why should anyone else?

Oh please, as though you ever cared about a single Palestinian life. Tens of thousands of Gaza children killed (and many bodies still rotting under the rubble) and yet you think Israeli actions are justified. Sick.

The war is a just war, and the Palestinian deaths are the foreseeable and preventable consequence of Hamas aggression and unwillingness to surrender. In WWII did the allies stop and call it a day after some magic number of civilians had been killed? No, they stopped when the enemies surrendered and were rendered completely incapable of further aggression. The Axis powers have ever since been peaceful. The lesson here for Hamas and the Palestinians is clear - release the hostages and surrender. Or keep mewling about nakbas, keep launching periodic terror attacks, and keep sustaining losses which could have been avoided with a pragmatic acceptance of the reality on the ground.

Comparing Hamas with the Axis / Nazis is appropriate and on-point because both Hamas (a designated terrorist organization) and the Nazis are/were determined to annihilate the Jewish people and erase their existence.

Israel’s war against Hamas terrorism is indeed a just and noble war. Let’s hope for a total and complete Israeli victory.

+1. The sooner the better, as the killing will stop once the casus belli (Hamas and their ilk) has been removed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel sucks.
Palestine sucks.
Hamas sucks the most, but they all suck.

They will continue killing each other until they are all dead. The idea that there are “good” and “bad” players in that war is an illusion.

You try to twist the facts so you can find a “good” side. You end up justifying children being murdered (“their parent was Hamas and using them as a human shield” OR “their parent is a colonizer who has abused Palestinians for decades, they’re acceptable collateral damage.”)

There’s no good side here.

Actually, there is. There is good and there is evil. The good side stays within its borders and doesn't launch terror raids into neighboring territory. The evil side engages in terror repeatedly over 75 or so years after losing a war they started. The evil side loses every time, but that doesn't make them less evil, and doesn't make the side which defeats them in self-defense any the less morally good.

Oh just stop. Israel doesn't stay within its borders. It doesn't believe in borders that are internationally recognized. Does it include Gaza, the West Bank, Golan Heights, or the Syrian and Lebanese villages it is currently occupying?

Keep on calling it self-defense. The rest of the world doesn't believe that anymore.

+1. And I hate to say it, but any moral cover the Israelis had for genocide that may have been afforded by the Holocaust has long expired. Just hearing the rhetoric coming from them is making me sick. It’s clear they don’t think Gazans are humans. Wonder where I heard that crap before.

I don't even think that many Israelis are religiously observant. At this point it's just all about nationalism.

There's no "moral cover for genocide" because there is no genocide. There is a righteous war against terrorists and those who raise, doctrinate, support, and shelter them. It is an entirely legitimate war of self-defense, which could have ended in an instant if the hostages were released. Hostage-taking is not the conduct of people with any claim to morality or to immunity for the consequences of their activites.

You keep saying that, but no amount of wishing will make it true. How many thousands of lives is enough retribution for a single hostage? We’re like thousands to one at this point.

However many it takes until they're released is the answer. The power to stop the killing is within Hamas' control. They just choose to keep trying to extort concessions at the expense of their own people, whom they apparently see as completely expendable. If they don't value those lives, why should anyone else?

Oh please, as though you ever cared about a single Palestinian life. Tens of thousands of Gaza children killed (and many bodies still rotting under the rubble) and yet you think Israeli actions are justified. Sick.

The war is a just war, and the Palestinian deaths are the foreseeable and preventable consequence of Hamas aggression and unwillingness to surrender. In WWII did the allies stop and call it a day after some magic number of civilians had been killed? No, they stopped when the enemies surrendered and were rendered completely incapable of further aggression. The Axis powers have ever since been peaceful. The lesson here for Hamas and the Palestinians is clear - release the hostages and surrender. Or keep mewling about nakbas, keep launching periodic terror attacks, and keep sustaining losses which could have been avoided with a pragmatic acceptance of the reality on the ground.

Comparing Hamas with the Axis / Nazis is appropriate and on-point because both Hamas (a designated terrorist organization) and the Nazis are/were determined to annihilate the Jewish people and erase their existence.

Israel’s war against Hamas terrorism is indeed a just and noble war. Let’s hope for a total and complete Israeli victory.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel sucks.
Palestine sucks.
Hamas sucks the most, but they all suck.

They will continue killing each other until they are all dead. The idea that there are “good” and “bad” players in that war is an illusion.

You try to twist the facts so you can find a “good” side. You end up justifying children being murdered (“their parent was Hamas and using them as a human shield” OR “their parent is a colonizer who has abused Palestinians for decades, they’re acceptable collateral damage.”)

There’s no good side here.

Actually, there is. There is good and there is evil. The good side stays within its borders and doesn't launch terror raids into neighboring territory. The evil side engages in terror repeatedly over 75 or so years after losing a war they started. The evil side loses every time, but that doesn't make them less evil, and doesn't make the side which defeats them in self-defense any the less morally good.

Oh just stop. Israel doesn't stay within its borders. It doesn't believe in borders that are internationally recognized. Does it include Gaza, the West Bank, Golan Heights, or the Syrian and Lebanese villages it is currently occupying?

Keep on calling it self-defense. The rest of the world doesn't believe that anymore.

+1. And I hate to say it, but any moral cover the Israelis had for genocide that may have been afforded by the Holocaust has long expired. Just hearing the rhetoric coming from them is making me sick. It’s clear they don’t think Gazans are humans. Wonder where I heard that crap before.

I don't even think that many Israelis are religiously observant. At this point it's just all about nationalism.

There's no "moral cover for genocide" because there is no genocide. There is a righteous war against terrorists and those who raise, doctrinate, support, and shelter them. It is an entirely legitimate war of self-defense, which could have ended in an instant if the hostages were released. Hostage-taking is not the conduct of people with any claim to morality or to immunity for the consequences of their activites.

You keep saying that, but no amount of wishing will make it true. How many thousands of lives is enough retribution for a single hostage? We’re like thousands to one at this point.

However many it takes until they're released is the answer. The power to stop the killing is within Hamas' control. They just choose to keep trying to extort concessions at the expense of their own people, whom they apparently see as completely expendable. If they don't value those lives, why should anyone else?

Oh please, as though you ever cared about a single Palestinian life. Tens of thousands of Gaza children killed (and many bodies still rotting under the rubble) and yet you think Israeli actions are justified. Sick.

The war is a just war, and the Palestinian deaths are the foreseeable and preventable consequence of Hamas aggression and unwillingness to surrender. In WWII did the allies stop and call it a day after some magic number of civilians had been killed? No, they stopped when the enemies surrendered and were rendered completely incapable of further aggression. The Axis powers have ever since been peaceful. The lesson here for Hamas and the Palestinians is clear - release the hostages and surrender. Or keep mewling about nakbas, keep launching periodic terror attacks, and keep sustaining losses which could have been avoided with a pragmatic acceptance of the reality on the ground.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel sucks.
Palestine sucks.
Hamas sucks the most, but they all suck.

They will continue killing each other until they are all dead. The idea that there are “good” and “bad” players in that war is an illusion.

You try to twist the facts so you can find a “good” side. You end up justifying children being murdered (“their parent was Hamas and using them as a human shield” OR “their parent is a colonizer who has abused Palestinians for decades, they’re acceptable collateral damage.”)

There’s no good side here.

Actually, there is. There is good and there is evil. The good side stays within its borders and doesn't launch terror raids into neighboring territory. The evil side engages in terror repeatedly over 75 or so years after losing a war they started. The evil side loses every time, but that doesn't make them less evil, and doesn't make the side which defeats them in self-defense any the less morally good.

Oh just stop. Israel doesn't stay within its borders. It doesn't believe in borders that are internationally recognized. Does it include Gaza, the West Bank, Golan Heights, or the Syrian and Lebanese villages it is currently occupying?

Keep on calling it self-defense. The rest of the world doesn't believe that anymore.

+1. And I hate to say it, but any moral cover the Israelis had for genocide that may have been afforded by the Holocaust has long expired. Just hearing the rhetoric coming from them is making me sick. It’s clear they don’t think Gazans are humans. Wonder where I heard that crap before.

I don't even think that many Israelis are religiously observant. At this point it's just all about nationalism.

There's no "moral cover for genocide" because there is no genocide. There is a righteous war against terrorists and those who raise, doctrinate, support, and shelter them. It is an entirely legitimate war of self-defense, which could have ended in an instant if the hostages were released. Hostage-taking is not the conduct of people with any claim to morality or to immunity for the consequences of their activites.

You keep saying that, but no amount of wishing will make it true. How many thousands of lives is enough retribution for a single hostage? We’re like thousands to one at this point.

However many it takes until they're released is the answer. The power to stop the killing is within Hamas' control. They just choose to keep trying to extort concessions at the expense of their own people, whom they apparently see as completely expendable. If they don't value those lives, why should anyone else?

Oh please, as though you ever cared about a single Palestinian life. Tens of thousands of Gaza children killed (and many bodies still rotting under the rubble) and yet you think Israeli actions are justified. Sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hamas needs to release the hostages and surrender.

If they did, what do you think the response would be?

Anonymous wrote:This aid to Israel is unconstitutional. We are favoring one religion over all others.

Anonymous wrote:Hamas needs to release the hostages and surrender.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel sucks.
Palestine sucks.
Hamas sucks the most, but they all suck.

They will continue killing each other until they are all dead. The idea that there are “good” and “bad” players in that war is an illusion.

You try to twist the facts so you can find a “good” side. You end up justifying children being murdered (“their parent was Hamas and using them as a human shield” OR “their parent is a colonizer who has abused Palestinians for decades, they’re acceptable collateral damage.”)

There’s no good side here.

Actually, there is. There is good and there is evil. The good side stays within its borders and doesn't launch terror raids into neighboring territory. The evil side engages in terror repeatedly over 75 or so years after losing a war they started. The evil side loses every time, but that doesn't make them less evil, and doesn't make the side which defeats them in self-defense any the less morally good.

Oh just stop. Israel doesn't stay within its borders. It doesn't believe in borders that are internationally recognized. Does it include Gaza, the West Bank, Golan Heights, or the Syrian and Lebanese villages it is currently occupying?

Keep on calling it self-defense. The rest of the world doesn't believe that anymore.

+1. And I hate to say it, but any moral cover the Israelis had for genocide that may have been afforded by the Holocaust has long expired. Just hearing the rhetoric coming from them is making me sick. It’s clear they don’t think Gazans are humans. Wonder where I heard that crap before.

I don't even think that many Israelis are religiously observant. At this point it's just all about nationalism.

There's no "moral cover for genocide" because there is no genocide. There is a righteous war against terrorists and those who raise, doctrinate, support, and shelter them. It is an entirely legitimate war of self-defense, which could have ended in an instant if the hostages were released. Hostage-taking is not the conduct of people with any claim to morality or to immunity for the consequences of their activites.

You keep saying that, but no amount of wishing will make it true. How many thousands of lives is enough retribution for a single hostage? We’re like thousands to one at this point.

However many it takes until they're released is the answer. The power to stop the killing is within Hamas' control. They just choose to keep trying to extort concessions at the expense of their own people, whom they apparently see as completely expendable. If they don't value those lives, why should anyone else?

Oh please, as though you ever cared about a single Palestinian life. Tens of thousands of Gaza children killed (and many bodies still rotting under the rubble) and yet you think Israeli actions are justified. Sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel has been bombing Gaza long before they had hostages. They want their land and will stop at nothing to get it. They thrive off of killing innocent children and know they can get away with it.

IDF incursions have always been responses to suppress or prevent Hamas terror activity, but recognizing that makes it harder to paint Israel as the aggressor, doesn't it? And yes, they will stop at nothing to protect their land, from Hamas, Hezbollah, and from anyone else who thinks they can take it.

Anonymous wrote:
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-846558#google_vignette
Israel, with Trump's full backing, escalates pressure on Hamas with fresh strikes - analysis
As mediators blitz through attempt to bring about an agreement for the release of additional hostages, the question remains: If this fails, what comes next?

Israel's wave of a large-scale attacks on Hamas in Gaza on Monday night were neither a full-scale war nor a specific threat of a ground operation, but an action aimed at convincing Hamas to agree to the framework presented in recent days by US President Donald Trump's administration.

Jerusalem did not hide its intent to launch a broad wave of airstrikes on Gaza from the United States. However, “there was no need for a green light because Trump gave us the option to open the gates of hell,” an Israeli source told The Jerusalem Post.

“Minister Ron Dermer updated senior members of the Trump administration that Israel would begin an aerial assault on Gaza to try to pressure Hamas to change its demands in the hostage deal,” the source said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't understand why Palestinians continue to support Hamas. The Hamas government has brought forth nothing but destruction to Gaza. How has taking all these hostages helped Palestinians? I understand they are getting Hamas militants and terrorists back for these hostages. But how does that help average Palestinians? Hamas has brought nothing but misery. I will never understand why people support them.

I am not convinced that they support Hamas.
What baffles me is why the Israelis continue to support Netanyahu