Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My husband isn’t quite like this but does sometimes forget that I have to go first or it doesn’t happen. If I can tell he his moving on to the “him” part too soon, I will literally take his hand and put it where it goes. I wish he would remember this on his own, and he does sometimes but not always.
Every single time you have to go first? That does not seem fair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, he never leaves the house, gets hard once in a blue moon and doesn't want to waste a good hard on foreplay, you have told him before. He is on spectrum. You are asking a fish to climb a tree.
I have slept with three men on Spectrum that I can recall. All horrific. Hard time getting up and zero interest in foreplay. They just know that the coming part is good.
I bet they are the fastest group to go for the blue bill.
I have to disagree with your assessment, having been with my partner on the spectrum for 20+ years and it is always been about making sure my pleasure is included. If anything, he’s too eager.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clearly he’s always been this way, why is it an issue now when it’s never been before?
This is the trouble with marrying a human and not a robot. At 50, I need a much longer lead and warmup time than I did 30 years ago. What OP describes could have been tolerable then but is an absolute no now.
OP, it doesn’t matter if he’s ready to go, if you are not. If he complains, you say; I have told you multiple times what I need.
Seriously. Wait till menopause starts, it can become excruciating for some women.
Not for the women here. They are perfect they are always supposedly ready for sex 40, 60 76 doesn't matter. The men are the problem not them!
Ummm this is a thread about a man who is objectively very bad in bed …
…whose performance was consistently rewarded and reinforced for for years with daily (!) sex but is now confronted with the expectation is that he will accept that he was actually bad for all those years and needs to change to do stuff he never has before to earn it for the once a month that it actually happens.
I am shocked that it isn’t going well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My husband isn’t quite like this but does sometimes forget that I have to go first or it doesn’t happen. If I can tell he his moving on to the “him” part too soon, I will literally take his hand and put it where it goes. I wish he would remember this on his own, and he does sometimes but not always.
Every single time you have to go first? That does not seem fair.
Anonymous wrote:My husband isn’t quite like this but does sometimes forget that I have to go first or it doesn’t happen. If I can tell he his moving on to the “him” part too soon, I will literally take his hand and put it where it goes. I wish he would remember this on his own, and he does sometimes but not always.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quick question. When women say they want more sex, do they mean they want more PIV or are they open to say sessions without PIV? Women can fake sex when they are not horny to please their partners much easier than men. It's very hard for a man to fake it because if he really isn't in the mood erections are much harder to achieve. And for this reason he can make excuses not to have sex. But then you guys take it as a rejection. You can fake it so you don't have to reject us. We can't.
Now if you mean all form of sex not just PIV then we can equally fake it to please you as long as you are not hurt that put lack of erection means we are not into it.
Then the question becomes how many women will be okay with a man lack of erection during a sex act and not making it about her?!
Plenty of men with ED make their livers feel utterly adored. PIV and boners are the end all be all. Also there’s babeland.com if we need gadgets.
Omg. Lovers not livers 😂
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lube up. Story of our marriage. They don't change.
OP here. Honestly, this may be the best advice. However, I feel like that pleases him still and not me. I want to be touched. I want to be turned on. Just lubing up turns him on and not me. I still want sex, very often, but I want my thighs stroked too, kissed, etc.
Anonymous wrote:So, he never leaves the house, gets hard once in a blue moon and doesn't want to waste a good hard on foreplay, you have told him before. He is on spectrum. You are asking a fish to climb a tree.
I have slept with three men on Spectrum that I can recall. All horrific. Hard time getting up and zero interest in foreplay. They just know that the coming part is good.
I bet they are the fastest group to go for the blue bill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our relationship it’s opposite. I’m DW and generally ready to go, dont want much foreplay. DH needs touch just generally. I have to make a point cuddle, kiss, hug ect because I do care about his needs. You should try to be physical with him more (in a non sexual way) and talk about it more
This is also me. I am more "wham, bam, thank you ma'am" meanwhile my partner loves a lot of constant contact, cuddling together and touching almost constantly. However, I would be extremely turned off if a man just expected me to instantly spread my legs at the drop of a hat with ZERO effort put into setting the mood. I dont need elaborate foreplay whatsoever, but it sounds like OP's DH does absolutely nothing and still expects sex on demand... that's a turn off based on the entitlement alone.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting some wham Bam thank you ma’am, but it sounds like these husbands every single time pound their wives for their own pleasure with no regard to pain or pleasure. Wanting sex quick and fast doesn’t mean you don’t allow for pleasure for your partner. We used to make fun of men like this in college calling them jackhammers, and warn our friends at all costs!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quick question. When women say they want more sex, do they mean they want more PIV or are they open to say sessions without PIV? Women can fake sex when they are not horny to please their partners much easier than men. It's very hard for a man to fake it because if he really isn't in the mood erections are much harder to achieve. And for this reason he can make excuses not to have sex. But then you guys take it as a rejection. You can fake it so you don't have to reject us. We can't.
Now if you mean all form of sex not just PIV then we can equally fake it to please you as long as you are not hurt that put lack of erection means we are not into it.
Then the question becomes how many women will be okay with a man lack of erection during a sex act and not making it about her?!
Plenty of men with ED make their livers feel utterly adored. PIV and boners are the end all be all. Also there’s babeland.com if we need gadgets.
Omg. Lovers not livers 😂
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our relationship it’s opposite. I’m DW and generally ready to go, dont want much foreplay. DH needs touch just generally. I have to make a point cuddle, kiss, hug ect because I do care about his needs. You should try to be physical with him more (in a non sexual way) and talk about it more
This is also me. I am more "wham, bam, thank you ma'am" meanwhile my partner loves a lot of constant contact, cuddling together and touching almost constantly. However, I would be extremely turned off if a man just expected me to instantly spread my legs at the drop of a hat with ZERO effort put into setting the mood. I dont need elaborate foreplay whatsoever, but it sounds like OP's DH does absolutely nothing and still expects sex on demand... that's a turn off based on the entitlement alone.