Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.
Anonymous wrote:She seems very confused.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Does Bondi really not know the difference between charges and a lawsuit?!
The Constitution quite clearly delegated this to the Feds, and it isn’t a responsibility that can be re-designated to states with a magic wand. This will fail in court.
Next!
She’s the standard dumb blonde trumper. It’s like they make them in a factory or something.
And the dumb blonde Press Secretary. Lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.
Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."
Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.
Anonymous wrote:
Finally! Back to Law & Order.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!
You are a fool.
Nope just pointing how MAGAs don’t care about the country, they just want to get back at the libs.
Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.
Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.
How is serving notice of legal action "obstruction"?
Do people not have a right to know who is peeking at their personal information?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One very sad silver lining to this contemptible administration is the incompetence of the cruel leaders that the Pusticle has put in place. Bondi is a pathetic "attorney". She doesn't seem to understand law. Her law school, Stetson University College of Law, is ranked #98 in law schools. She's a member of the Florida bar, where they take the bar exam in crayon.
#98 ?
Under which system; USNWR ratings? If so, Stetson is tied with American University’s law school, which is excellent.
Anonymous wrote:One very sad silver lining to this contemptible administration is the incompetence of the cruel leaders that the Pusticle has put in place. Bondi is a pathetic "attorney". She doesn't seem to understand law. Her law school, Stetson University College of Law, is ranked #98 in law schools. She's a member of the Florida bar, where they take the bar exam in crayon.