Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.

Like Hillary Clinton, Ginsburg had the "first girl" syndrome.

Why do people always forget Geraldine Ferraro???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.

Like Hillary Clinton, Ginsburg had the "first girl" syndrome.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

We sent men to fight in wars because they're replaceable. It's not because they're stronger; very little in war requires brute strength that in-shape females can't provide. It's not because they're smarter; women actually have a small lead here. It's because, if mom dies, the family falls apart. If dad dies, that's sad, and would create hardships, but he can be replaced fairly easily.

Not trying to be misandrist, and not saying it's right, fair, or good. But... yeah. That's the reasoning.

Anonymous wrote:In 1975, 90% of women in Iceland went on strike for equal wages and rights. That day was also called “the long Friday”.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34602822

Five years later, Iceland elected their first female president. I don’t think women are in enough solidarity to pull this off here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1975, 90% of women in Iceland went on strike for equal wages and rights. That day was also called “the long Friday”.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34602822

Five years later, Iceland elected their first female president. I don’t think women are in enough solidarity to pull this off here.

+1 Women here are always feeling sorry for themselves.

Anonymous wrote:In 1975, 90% of women in Iceland went on strike for equal wages and rights. That day was also called “the long Friday”.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34602822

Five years later, Iceland elected their first female president. I don’t think women are in enough solidarity to pull this off here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

So true.

(And rather ironic, given this regime’s toxic masculinity)

Seriously what happened to all the MAGA "alphas"??

Men spend entirely too much time around the water cooler, the golf course and the strip club building relationships to get ahead.

Women don’t have the same connections, they have to work twice hard to make 1/2 the progress.

They don’t have the same fear that it will all fall apart if they can’t get Bob to do them a solid somewhere down the line.

One need only look at the feckless boy wonder idiot that is Johnson to understand how it all works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

We sent men to fight in wars because they're replaceable. It's not because they're stronger; very little in war requires brute strength that in-shape females can't provide. It's not because they're smarter; women actually have a small lead here. It's because, if mom dies, the family falls apart. If dad dies, that's sad, and would create hardships, but he can be replaced fairly easily.

Not trying to be misandrist, and not saying it's right, fair, or good. But... yeah. That's the reasoning.

Women and men are both dependent on each other. No men then no children. It makes me smile when women talk as if it's all about them.

I bet your dad would be very sad to know that you always thought that he could be replaced fairly easily.

In the most practical of evolutionary terms, one man can reproduce many times in a limited amount of time while a woman can only reproduce once every year or so. Men are more expendable than women in this scenario.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

So true.

(And rather ironic, given this regime’s toxic masculinity)

Seriously what happened to all the MAGA "alphas"??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

We sent men to fight in wars because they're replaceable. It's not because they're stronger; very little in war requires brute strength that in-shape females can't provide. It's not because they're smarter; women actually have a small lead here. It's because, if mom dies, the family falls apart. If dad dies, that's sad, and would create hardships, but he can be replaced fairly easily.

Not trying to be misandrist, and not saying it's right, fair, or good. But... yeah. That's the reasoning.

Women and men are both dependent on each other. No men then no children. It makes me smile when women talk as if it's all about them.

I bet your dad would be very sad to know that you always thought that he could be replaced fairly easily.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The “gender wars” online were a rouse. Totally not accurate IRL. We love our men and all people.

This. I don’t actually think there is a male female divide. Some scary things happened during me too, but we are over that

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

We sent men to fight in wars because they're replaceable. It's not because they're stronger; very little in war requires brute strength that in-shape females can't provide. It's not because they're smarter; women actually have a small lead here. It's because, if mom dies, the family falls apart. If dad dies, that's sad, and would create hardships, but he can be replaced fairly easily.

Not trying to be misandrist, and not saying it's right, fair, or good. But... yeah. That's the reasoning.

Anonymous wrote:Yes! I have noticed that in those clips of the town halls with GOP politicians, they tend to be more female than male, that the women speak up more and the ones booing the loudest are women.