Ok, when is Cis affinity month ? And when is the parade ? Everyone else gets a parade, I want mine (because I’m special for being Cis).Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
“Cisgender” means traditional gender aspects and mannerisms consistent with sex assigned at birth, including masculine or feminine traits and social mores, and a sexual attraction to the opposite biological sex. Unless a gay man was only attracted to other gay men who themselves are transgendered and identified only as heterosexual women, it would be difficult to suggest that that gay man was cisgender.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
“Cisgender” means traditional gender aspects and mannerisms consistent with sex assigned at birth, including masculine or feminine traits and social mores, and a sexual attraction to the opposite biological sex. Unless a gay man was only attracted to other gay men who themselves are transgendered and identified only as heterosexual women, it would be difficult to suggest that that gay man was cisgender.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
“Cisgender” means traditional gender aspects and mannerisms consistent with sex assigned at birth, including masculine or feminine traits and social mores, and a sexual attraction to the opposite biological sex. Unless a gay man was only attracted to other gay men who themselves are transgendered and identified only as heterosexual women, it would be difficult to suggest that that gay man was cisgender.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
So then what is it? Why do we need a special term for “normal” ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
So then what is it? Why do we need a special term for “normal” ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).
Anonymous wrote:i'm cisgender and in no way consider being called cisgender offensive. It's like being called heterosexual, which I also don't think is offensive.
Anonymous wrote:I'm 45. I find it funny because the word Mace used was publicly used by trans themselves and plenty of trans supportive LGB people till, oh, maybe three years ago.
Storm in a teacup. Not getting concerned over pearl clutching by DCUM posters and Dems who forever are changing the meaning of words to fit their narrative and to find more things to be upset about.
Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.
Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?
It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.
How is this ok?
Anonymous wrote:I'm 45. I find it funny because the word Mace used was publicly used by trans themselves and plenty of trans supportive LGB people till, oh, maybe three years ago.
Storm in a teacup. Not getting concerned over pearl clutching by DCUM posters and Dems who forever are changing the meaning of words to fit their narrative and to find more things to be upset about.
Anonymous wrote:No. Is any clip ever demonstrative of any group of people? No.