Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Option A: Actually enforce DC littering laws.
https://mpdc.dc.gov/page/littering-enforcement-help-keep-dc-clean
Option B: Create more bureaucracy that will be ineffective but cost DC residents and retailers more.
DC progressives. “Option B!”
I lived in Idaho and they give money for recycling (at least at the time).
Not exactly a bastion of progressives.
Anonymous wrote:Bottle deposits make no sense in the age of single-stream recycling. Right now us DC residents put all our recycling (bottles, cans, paper, cardboard, plastic, etc.) in the blue bin where it gets picked up each week (sometimes twice a week depending on where you live). This idea that we're going to sort our returnables separately, store them in our house for a while, and finally take them back to the grocery story to be redeemed like it's 1992 is completely nuts.
Yes, I grew up in a state with a bottle deposit.
Anonymous wrote:Option A: Actually enforce DC littering laws.
https://mpdc.dc.gov/page/littering-enforcement-help-keep-dc-clean
Option B: Create more bureaucracy that will be ineffective but cost DC residents and retailers more.
DC progressives. “Option B!”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is totally on brand for progressive crazies. Rather than addressing the actual problem, LITTERING, they come up with a new expensive program that won’t solve the underlying problem. I just can’t anymore with these people.
I hate progressive crazies as much as you do, but it does clean up the bottles because their other pet project (homeless people everywhere) will be incentivized to go and clean up a little. Yes the rest of the plastic trash will still be left around but at least bottles would be picked up.
Since they’re releasing violent criminals back on the streets even after multiple offenses, it will be a cold day in hell before they ever punish someone for littering.
Why not just the homeless directly to pick up trash? Skip the deposit.
Anonymous wrote:The Council shouldn’t be allowed to create a new program until they can show that they can effectively run the leaf collection program. Which they currently cannot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is totally on brand for progressive crazies. Rather than addressing the actual problem, LITTERING, they come up with a new expensive program that won’t solve the underlying problem. I just can’t anymore with these people.
Well you know you could move back to whatever flyover state that come from
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is totally on brand for progressive crazies. Rather than addressing the actual problem, LITTERING, they come up with a new expensive program that won’t solve the underlying problem. I just can’t anymore with these people.
I hate progressive crazies as much as you do, but it does clean up the bottles because their other pet project (homeless people everywhere) will be incentivized to go and clean up a little. Yes the rest of the plastic trash will still be left around but at least bottles would be picked up.
Since they’re releasing violent criminals back on the streets even after multiple offenses, it will be a cold day in hell before they ever punish someone for littering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh I am from a state that does this and have zero issues with it.
+100
Colorado (Boulder/Denver) has this no issues.
In areas that do not offer municipal curbside recycling, the bottle tax makes some sense. In cities like DC where there is an existing municipal recycling program, it makes little sense.
Anonymous wrote:I just moved to a state that does this. I have seen homeless people pick up discarded cans off the street. Literally cleaning up litter.
We collect our cans in a separate container. It takes zero extra seconds.