Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mandy Moore’s house didn’t burn down but two structures on the property did (a detached garage and studio space). Likely a lot of smoke damage but she didn’t lose her house or belongings.

https://people.com/mandy-moore-main-part-home-still-standing-amid-eaton-fire-8771601

Some of these celebs need to quiet down. Why is People posting about Mandy Moore’s survivor guilt that her house didn’t burn. The fires are still raging.

Do you expect People magazine to -- do what, exactly? Be out there firefighting? They're going to fill space however they can. Some days, that's going to include interviews with, gasp, celebrities whose homes did not burn down. If it bothers you, please feel free to scroll on past. If you think it's tone-deaf, well, that's a point, but criticizing People for doing its usual thing is kind of like criticizing the tide for coming in....You know it's going to happen and you can't control it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Updated list

https://people.com/celebrities-who-lost-homes-or-evacuted-amid-california-fires-8771122

Wow. That's quite a list.

The last part of the list (#40 onward) didn’t lose their houses. They are celebs who lived in the area and posted about evacuating but their homes survived.

I also saw that Eric Braeden (Victor from Y and R) lost the home he had lived in for 45 years.

I do feel for celebs who had lived in a house for a long time and who don’t have multiple homes as they still will experience a great sense of loss even though they are in a better financial situation to rebuild.

Agree re: feeling for those who are better off financially. Rebuilding in this situation may not happen for a very long time, if at all. Even for thise with money and/or insurance (if they still had it when the fires hit). Building supplies will be scarce and difficult to source; contractors will be swamped; the city and county might need extra time to mitigate toxins and remove hazardous debris especially from older houses, etc. And as you note, not all celebrities have second homes--that's kind of a stereotype.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mandy Moore’s house didn’t burn down but two structures on the property did (a detached garage and studio space). Likely a lot of smoke damage but she didn’t lose her house or belongings.

https://people.com/mandy-moore-main-part-home-still-standing-amid-eaton-fire-8771601

Some of these celebs need to quiet down. Why is People posting about Mandy Moore’s survivor guilt that her house didn’t burn. The fires are still raging.

Anonymous wrote:Mandy Moore’s house didn’t burn down but two structures on the property did (a detached garage and studio space). Likely a lot of smoke damage but she didn’t lose her house or belongings.

https://people.com/mandy-moore-main-part-home-still-standing-amid-eaton-fire-8771601

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Updated list

https://people.com/celebrities-who-lost-homes-or-evacuted-amid-california-fires-8771122

Wow. That's quite a list.

The last part of the list (#40 onward) didn’t lose their houses. They are celebs who lived in the area and posted about evacuating but their homes survived.

I also saw that Eric Braeden (Victor from Y and R) lost the home he had lived in for 45 years.

I do feel for celebs who had lived in a house for a long time and who don’t have multiple homes as they still will experience a great sense of loss even though they are in a better financial situation to rebuild.

Mandy Moore’s house didn’t burn down but two structures on the property did (a detached garage and studio space). Likely a lot of smoke damage but she didn’t lose her house or belongings.

Anonymous wrote:Updated list

https://people.com/celebrities-who-lost-homes-or-evacuted-amid-california-fires-8771122

Wow. That's quite a list.

Anonymous wrote:Classiest, most eloquent comments so far from someone who just lost their home…Coach Redick of the Lakers. There’s a reason why he’s in such a visible leadership position. Amazing class act.

Go Duke!

Anonymous wrote:Classiest, most eloquent comments so far from someone who just lost their home…Coach Redick of the Lakers. There’s a reason why he’s in such a visible leadership position. Amazing class act.

Wow, kindest reactions all from people who others tried to cancel

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update! James Woods house survived

I imagine even if your home is left standing, it’s a disaster internally from smoke damage. Very sad all around.

Yea, I read a Reddit post from someone who was the only house standing after a wildfire, and the experience sounded terrible. Still couldn’t move in for a while due to the smoke damage and no power/water, you basically live in what looks like a war zone, your whole community is gone, the air is toxic. Just plain awful.

Anonymous wrote:Update! James Woods house survived

I imagine even if your home is left standing, it’s a disaster internally from smoke damage. Very sad all around.

Updated list

https://people.com/celebrities-who-lost-homes-or-evacuted-amid-california-fires-8771122

Classiest, most eloquent comments so far from someone who just lost their home…Coach Redick of the Lakers. There’s a reason why he’s in such a visible leadership position. Amazing class act.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it very annoying that the media is 100% focusing on the celebrities who lost their homes and no focus of discussion of anyone else who lost their homes like it's only "celebrities" who matter here. I'm so sick of the media for so many reasons. They disgust me.

Where are you getting your news? The front pages of the Post, the NYT, NPR, LA Times, CNN all have tons of stories about the fire and everyday people?

Me too - been pleasantly surprised

Anonymous wrote:So far the two celebs that I have seen post some of the most sensitive but heartbreaking posts are Paris Hilton (as others have mentioned) and also Spencer Pratt.

They both seem like good people and good parents.