Anonymous wrote:Looking good for the Dem in Wisconsin. You can follow the vote count as it comes in and is updated continuously here.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/01/us/elections/results-wisconsin-supreme-court.html
Anonymous wrote:NBC called it for the Democrat, Crawford, in WI! Suck it, Musk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.
Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?
Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.
She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.
🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.
It is. Dave Wasserman called it at least 10 minutes ago.
Wait, Dave’s seen enough?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.
Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?
Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.
She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.
🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.
It is. Dave Wasserman called it at least 10 minutes ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.
Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?
Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.
She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.
🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.
Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?
Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.
She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt Dems can win either of the house seats. These were both Trump +30 districts. That would be a massive swing. But if the Rs only win by 10 or 15, every R in an even moderately close district should start getting very worried.
Nope.
There will be no elections after 2025.
Stop with this. States run elections. The White House does not. The US Congress does not.
Will there be contests with highly suspicious results in some places? Probably.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.
Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?
Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.
She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.