Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many people in dmv with high clearance are not allowed to buy/own crypto directly. Buying mstr & Tesla are the ways to buy crypto “legally”. My bad for not buying any after Trump got elected on nov with my fun money.
Can't they buy one of the many Bitcoin ETFs?
For example:
I am told that I can not buy bitcoin directly on coinbase or PayPal. It is ok to buy mstr, Tesla. I don’t know the logic!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many people in dmv with high clearance are not allowed to buy/own crypto directly. Buying mstr & Tesla are the ways to buy crypto “legally”. My bad for not buying any after Trump got elected on nov with my fun money.
Can't they buy one of the many Bitcoin ETFs?
For example:
I am told that I can not buy bitcoin directly on coinbase or PayPal. It is ok to buy mstr, Tesla. I don’t know the logic!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many people in dmv with high clearance are not allowed to buy/own crypto directly. Buying mstr & Tesla are the ways to buy crypto “legally”. My bad for not buying any after Trump got elected on nov with my fun money.
Can't they buy one of the many Bitcoin ETFs?
Anonymous wrote:I think many people in dmv with high clearance are not allowed to buy/own crypto directly. Buying mstr & Tesla are the ways to buy crypto “legally”. My bad for not buying any after Trump got elected on nov with my fun money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
They now literally call themselves a Bitcoin treasury company. The software operations are largely irrelevant now. The company decided to make a strategic change, fully disclosed, and the results have been extraordinary- yet you think they should be sued?
They made $116 million in revenue last quarter selling their data analytics software and related services.
Then, they seem to be taking out $4bln+ in debt to buy crypto to fund their "treasury operations" (crypto purchases).
https://assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/bltb564490bc5201f31/blte0b82e7c89a4feb3/67238407ec6903679e80cdc5/form-10-q_10-31-2024.pdf
What is this company? A software company bringing in over half a billion in revenue a year, or a crypto investment company?
It’s basically a Bitcoin bank with a market cap near $100 billion. The software business is now basically immaterial to the valuation and overall financials. Businesses are allowed to change their strategies. Amazon went from being a bookseller to a cloud company. The MSTR Bitcoin strategy was controversial four years ago but Saylor has had the last laugh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
They now literally call themselves a Bitcoin treasury company. The software operations are largely irrelevant now. The company decided to make a strategic change, fully disclosed, and the results have been extraordinary- yet you think they should be sued?
They made $116 million in revenue last quarter selling their data analytics software and related services.
Then, they seem to be taking out $4bln+ in debt to buy crypto to fund their "treasury operations" (crypto purchases).
https://assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/bltb564490bc5201f31/blte0b82e7c89a4feb3/67238407ec6903679e80cdc5/form-10-q_10-31-2024.pdf
What is this company? A software company bringing in over half a billion in revenue a year, or a crypto investment company?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
They now literally call themselves a Bitcoin treasury company. The software operations are largely irrelevant now. The company decided to make a strategic change, fully disclosed, and the results have been extraordinary- yet you think they should be sued?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
Your timing is uncanny, lol:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsofts-sha...ether-100000952.html
botched link above - see:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsofts-shareholders-decide-week-whether-100000952.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
Your timing is uncanny, lol:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsofts-shareholders-decide-week-whether-100000952.html
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?
To me, it's negligence. For example, I may buy Microsoft because I want to invest in the tech industry. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to go into oil exploration and oil wells. I'd buy Shell or Mobil if I wanted to have exposure to that.
Microstrategy is a well-known software company that's been in this area for 20+ years. I think I even interviewed for them to be a software dev back when I was jsut getting out of college. They should set up a "Bitcoin investment company" if that is their goal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of the large generic mutual funds long Vanguard's have Bitcoin / adjacent securities mixed in?
Index funds would automatically own MSTR and such.
Why hasn't Microstrategy been sued by investors for negligence? They're a local company and have been a software comapny for 20+ years. You can even see their website now -- they offer a data analytics product:
https://www.microstrategy.com/
They shouldn't be dabbling in bitcoin by buying more than $2bln of it. Investors who want bitcoin exposuer have other avenues fro it. Investors who want to invest in the data analytics software industry should (in theory) buy MSTR to get exposure to that.
They are doing nothing illegal. btw, they own $40 billion now. has been best performing stock in the market by a huge margin. why would any shareholder sue them?