Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be realistic about how athletic your daughter is - not how technical or good at soccer - but how athletic. Deciding factor in speed of play on girls side at older ages is dominated by athleticism and aggression.
Eff this advice. Be technical and smart. This is everything that is wrong with American soccer and slowly the game is evolving.
That said, of course athleticism matters a lot. It is a sport but you can control your technical and tactical development. Athleticism is god given.
Also, to those who are athletic, great, do us all a favor and stop being lazy and simply relying on athleticism. Play some wall ball, be a student of the game and respect the technical aspects. If you are an athletic freak then it shouldn't be hard to develop good first touch. The game demands technical players when all anyone has is athleticism.
Thank you. If your kid's only selling point is size and speed that's sad and doing the player a disservice. Studies show smaller players that stick with soccer into high school do much better because they learn so much more/work harder than the players who do minimal work and rely just on their size/speed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be realistic about how athletic your daughter is - not how technical or good at soccer - but how athletic. Deciding factor in speed of play on girls side at older ages is dominated by athleticism and aggression.
Eff this advice. Be technical and smart. This is everything that is wrong with American soccer and slowly the game is evolving.
That said, of course athleticism matters a lot. It is a sport but you can control your technical and tactical development. Athleticism is god given.
Also, to those who are athletic, great, do us all a favor and stop being lazy and simply relying on athleticism. Play some wall ball, be a student of the game and respect the technical aspects. If you are an athletic freak then it shouldn't be hard to develop good first touch. The game demands technical players when all anyone has is athleticism.
Anonymous wrote:Be realistic about how athletic your daughter is - not how technical or good at soccer - but how athletic. Deciding factor in speed of play on girls side at older ages is dominated by athleticism and aggression.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^100 percent.
Also: the best kids are picked by U12. If not on top team somewhere, will be nearly impossible to move up.
Don’t let her suffer with a mean or bad coach.
Don’t keep her on a team if she’s not playing most of the game at that age.
It’s all about confidence. Let her hog a ball a bit. Selflessness gets you nowhere in girls soccer.
Also, this is 100%
If I knew now at u11 what I wish I would have known at u8 (Yes, we started travel at u8 and played a year up early with our local club.); then I would have switched her to a feeder ECNL club or straight ECNL club earlier. We stayed a 1-2 years too long at our local club because my DD was not ready to switch. (Didn't understand why.) But now we did switch and the tops teams are slammed full of kids. All very good kids. Our local club did not have the development or intensity needed to level my player at all. Now, we have to hope that about 10 other kids who arrived here before us either move out of the area, switch clubs or start to suck somehow. Otherwise, even with loads of hard work, we are still behind a lot of kids who had better development and behind in terms of longevity at priority at the club.
Do what you have to do to not get stuck on a ECNL RL team or a GA-II team. None of those teams get a lot of college exposure. None of those teams or players get recommended for much anything. I'd hate to get stuck on that level of a team (often kids are there, because they are stuck there and there is no room to move up), I'd switch to a club that has the club you want for college recruiting now.
(The exception to that is parents who know their kid is super athletic, bigger, faster and stronger than their peers.... they won't have to worry about switching early...they usually get picked at try outs for which ever team they go to... this take is based that observation 3 times over.)
And yes, keep working on juggling... that is a skill that showcases and encapsulates a kid's dedication to the sport to the coaches.
It's not 'we' You are not playing, your kid is. If your kid needs 10 other kids to leave the club, I don't think you have to worry about colleges scouting them
I took the “not we” approach with my older. With my younger I’ve gone full circle, it’s absolutely “we.” Yes she is the player, in the payer, driver, factotum, expediter, dietician, laundry specialist, etc. It’s absolutely a home team behind the player. So yep, “WE have to travel this weekend, because WE have a tournament.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^100 percent.
Also: the best kids are picked by U12. If not on top team somewhere, will be nearly impossible to move up.
Don’t let her suffer with a mean or bad coach.
Don’t keep her on a team if she’s not playing most of the game at that age.
It’s all about confidence. Let her hog a ball a bit. Selflessness gets you nowhere in girls soccer.
Also, this is 100%
If I knew now at u11 what I wish I would have known at u8 (Yes, we started travel at u8 and played a year up early with our local club.); then I would have switched her to a feeder ECNL club or straight ECNL club earlier. We stayed a 1-2 years too long at our local club because my DD was not ready to switch. (Didn't understand why.) But now we did switch and the tops teams are slammed full of kids. All very good kids. Our local club did not have the development or intensity needed to level my player at all. Now, we have to hope that about 10 other kids who arrived here before us either move out of the area, switch clubs or start to suck somehow. Otherwise, even with loads of hard work, we are still behind a lot of kids who had better development and behind in terms of longevity at priority at the club.
Do what you have to do to not get stuck on a ECNL RL team or a GA-II team. None of those teams get a lot of college exposure. None of those teams or players get recommended for much anything. I'd hate to get stuck on that level of a team (often kids are there, because they are stuck there and there is no room to move up), I'd switch to a club that has the club you want for college recruiting now.
(The exception to that is parents who know their kid is super athletic, bigger, faster and stronger than their peers.... they won't have to worry about switching early...they usually get picked at try outs for which ever team they go to... this take is based that observation 3 times over.)
And yes, keep working on juggling... that is a skill that showcases and encapsulates a kid's dedication to the sport to the coaches.
It's not 'we' You are not playing, your kid is. If your kid needs 10 other kids to leave the club, I don't think you have to worry about colleges scouting them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cant you also strengthen and build athleticism by exposing your kid to other sports? This seems like a vital aspect in development. It looks like a lot of kids use basketball to compliment soccer. Curious if folks agree and other sports that are nice crossovers.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be realistic about how athletic your daughter is - not how technical or good at soccer - but how athletic. Deciding factor in speed of play on girls side at older ages is dominated by athleticism and aggression.
This advice is dead wrong. Girls ages 9-12 are still growing and most have not hit puberty. You’d be a fool to judge factors such as aggression and size over technical ability at this age. Usually, kids with great technical ability also have speed and athleticism anyways.
Kids without the technical skills by age 12 should reconsider what sports to invest their time in. Muscle memory has already kicked in; whereas, athleticism, aggression and speed can always be taught. Technical abilities have a range before it’s just not happening. typically because if a kid has not practiced these skills in the past 3 years, they won’t automatically get disciplined enough to do it. I’ve never seen a 12 year old suddenly execute amazing technical skills if they didn’t already have a baseline.
You can't teach speed or athleticism. It's either there or not. You can make a kid marginally faster, but you can not make a slow kid fast
It’s clear you have never coached girls (maybe rec) or ever had good coaches. These are the most basic skills you can teach younger kids. Even older kids can get in shape and develop speed and athleticism. This is nothing more than getting in shape. Aggression is just a state of mind. However, skills get harder and harder to develop with age. That is why every country outside of America teaches fundamentals and skills repetitively. Over and over again then they work on size and aggression in the older years.
You're a natural athlete or you aren't. By U12, the travel kids are all already running and in shape, you still can't make a slow kid fast or quick.
I've had two kids go through ulittle to high school. The fastest and most athletic kids when the teams formed at U9 were the ones playing ECNL or other sports at that level by high school. No amount of training can overcome genetics especially when all of the kids they're competing against are also training
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question was what should OP not do, or do, now. Above answer is right and fair. If you want the best team and best college chances, you have to get there early, whatever it takes. I saw a FIVE YEAR OLD with a private trainer. Yes really.
My DC is stuck on RL for exactly that reason. She COULD HAVE made NL if we had know all this early on. That’s the PPs point (and mine).
Me too. We switched at u13 and there was no way to get on a top team. That team was packed and the second team is also. If I had to do it over again at u9, I would have switched clubs earlier.
Anonymous wrote:The question was what should OP not do, or do, now. Above answer is right and fair. If you want the best team and best college chances, you have to get there early, whatever it takes. I saw a FIVE YEAR OLD with a private trainer. Yes really.
My DC is stuck on RL for exactly that reason. She COULD HAVE made NL if we had know all this early on. That’s the PPs point (and mine).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^100 percent.
Also: the best kids are picked by U12. If not on top team somewhere, will be nearly impossible to move up.
Don’t let her suffer with a mean or bad coach.
Don’t keep her on a team if she’s not playing most of the game at that age.
It’s all about confidence. Let her hog a ball a bit. Selflessness gets you nowhere in girls soccer.
Also, this is 100%
If I knew now at u11 what I wish I would have known at u8 (Yes, we started travel at u8 and played a year up early with our local club.); then I would have switched her to a feeder ECNL club or straight ECNL club earlier. We stayed a 1-2 years too long at our local club because my DD was not ready to switch. (Didn't understand why.) But now we did switch and the tops teams are slammed full of kids. All very good kids. Our local club did not have the development or intensity needed to level my player at all. Now, we have to hope that about 10 other kids who arrived here before us either move out of the area, switch clubs or start to suck somehow. Otherwise, even with loads of hard work, we are still behind a lot of kids who had better development and behind in terms of longevity at priority at the club.
Do what you have to do to not get stuck on a ECNL RL team or a GA-II team. None of those teams get a lot of college exposure. None of those teams or players get recommended for much anything. I'd hate to get stuck on that level of a team (often kids are there, because they are stuck there and there is no room to move up), I'd switch to a club that has the club you want for college recruiting now.
(The exception to that is parents who know their kid is super athletic, bigger, faster and stronger than their peers.... they won't have to worry about switching early...they usually get picked at try outs for which ever team they go to... this take is based that observation 3 times over.)
And yes, keep working on juggling... that is a skill that showcases and encapsulates a kid's dedication to the sport to the coaches.
It's not 'we' You are not playing, your kid is. If your kid needs 10 other kids to leave the club, I don't think you have to worry about colleges scouting them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be realistic about how athletic your daughter is - not how technical or good at soccer - but how athletic. Deciding factor in speed of play on girls side at older ages is dominated by athleticism and aggression.
This advice is dead wrong. Girls ages 9-12 are still growing and most have not hit puberty. You’d be a fool to judge factors such as aggression and size over technical ability at this age. Usually, kids with great technical ability also have speed and athleticism anyways.
Kids without the technical skills by age 12 should reconsider what sports to invest their time in. Muscle memory has already kicked in; whereas, athleticism, aggression and speed can always be taught. Technical abilities have a range before it’s just not happening. typically because if a kid has not practiced these skills in the past 3 years, they won’t automatically get disciplined enough to do it. I’ve never seen a 12 year old suddenly execute amazing technical skills if they didn’t already have a baseline.
Anonymous wrote:If they played GA, you don’t live where I live. Location also matters. No one from a former small club will make an ECNL team in HS for the first time here.
Anonymous wrote:The question was what should OP not do, or do, now. Above answer is right and fair. If you want the best team and best college chances, you have to get there early, whatever it takes. I saw a FIVE YEAR OLD with a private trainer. Yes really.
My DC is stuck on RL for exactly that reason. She COULD HAVE made NL if we had know all this early on. That’s the PPs point (and mine).