Anonymous wrote:I’m just saying

Like less then 1 percent of junior academy players ever become pro..and this is in England!!!

So it’s not a shocker that this pathway has resulted in literally nothing

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

Then this is a marketing gimmick across all the MLS Clubs

Because only a few players were recruited into an academy after being recognized through local clubs affiliate programs and became professionals.

Not if they are producing pros. Which Philly is doing. Most other clubs are trying to produce pros. DCU isn't. Big difference.

You sound pretty silly saying a professional academy is spending thousands on academy players but have no intentions of them going pro.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

Then this is a marketing gimmick across all the MLS Clubs

Because only a few players were recruited into an academy after being recognized through local clubs affiliate programs and became professionals.

Not if they are producing pros. Which Philly is doing. Most other clubs are trying to produce pros. DCU isn't. Big difference.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

How old is MLS Next?

Which academies have sent affiliate p2p players to Professional ranks?

2020

Just off top of my head and in our own region, both Aaronson brothers, mcglynn, both Sullivan brothers at Union. Carrizo at nycfc. All in last six years.

There are more...

Paxten Aaronson was 12 years old at Philly

Which p2p club did he come from?

their dad OWNS Real New Jersey where they both started. Feeder for union.

Real Jersey or Philly Union gets the credit?

For sure Union. As they should. That is where they spent the most time. But both kids got there through P2P

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

Then this is a marketing gimmick across all the MLS Clubs

Because only a few players were recruited into an academy after being recognized through local clubs affiliate programs and became professionals.

Not if they are producing pros. Which Philly is doing. Most other clubs are trying to produce pros. DCU isn't. Big difference.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

How old is MLS Next?

Which academies have sent affiliate p2p players to Professional ranks?

2020

Just off top of my head and in our own region, both Aaronson brothers, mcglynn, both Sullivan brothers at Union. Carrizo at nycfc. All in last six years.

There are more...

Paxten Aaronson was 12 years old at Philly

Which p2p club did he come from?

their dad OWNS Real New Jersey where they both started. Feeder for union.

Real Jersey or Philly Union gets the credit?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

Then this is a marketing gimmick across all the MLS Clubs

Because only a few players were recruited into an academy after being recognized through local clubs affiliate programs and became professionals.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU moving 5 2011 up to 2010 for 2025/26 season, filling in spots on 2011 bench.

Not sure why they bother soliciting names of players from ECNL when they are part of MLS and MLSNext is the better league.

They have a P2P program and scout the partner clubs as well as anyone else they damn well choose to scout, MLSN or otherwise. There is seriously no need to *hit on kids who have an opportunity to be scouted. If you were actually someone with expertise on the issue, you'd be employed by the academy as a scout and too busy with your actual job to be on here carrying on with MLSN>ECNL ad nauseam.

Not attacking anyone, particularly kids. I also don’t post “ad nauseum” on the topic, no need for the ad hominem attack.

Nice try but that’s exactly what you did. You’re attacking little boys’ credentials is what you’re doing. It’s gross. You don’t know these kids most likely so assuming they’re unqualified bc they play on ECNL teams is utter nonsense. It would be better for you to STFU about it and let them and their families enjoy the opportunity the boys earned. No one needs your stupid commentary.

As impartial observer I must say that you are now overreacting.

How dare you demean the professional credentials of my little boy 😂

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

How old is MLS Next?

Which academies have sent affiliate p2p players to Professional ranks?

2020

Just off top of my head and in our own region, both Aaronson brothers, mcglynn, both Sullivan brothers at Union. Carrizo at nycfc. All in last six years.

There are more...

Paxten Aaronson was 12 years old at Philly

Which p2p club did he come from?

their dad OWNS Real New Jersey where they both started. Feeder for union.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

How old is MLS Next?

Which academies have sent affiliate p2p players to Professional ranks?

2020

Just off top of my head and in our own region, both Aaronson brothers, mcglynn, both Sullivan brothers at Union. Carrizo at nycfc. All in last six years.

There are more...

Paxten Aaronson was 12 years old at Philly

Which p2p club did he come from?

their dad OWNS Real New Jersey where they both started. Feeder for union.

Just read https://www.edpsoccer.com/post/real-jersey-fc-developing-and-preparing-players-for-the-next-level

Pretty quiet now huh...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCU’s P2P Program: The Illusion of Opportunity ?????

The DCU P2P program is primarily a marketing and ticket sales initiative, mutually agreed upon by the clubs involved. While it’s presented as a legitimate opportunity, the reality is far different. Having a relationship with DCU provides little to no tangible benefits for player development. The clubs that genuinely produce talent understand that DCU is often not the best option. However, families are still drawn to it, making it more about packaging than substance. The DCU academy’s scouting department, unfortunately, lacks competence and direction, highlighting the program’s underlying issues.

Many of the clubs involved in the P2P program openly acknowledge these shortcomings. They recognize that the initiative is more about optics than actual player development, and they often voice their concerns about the lack of meaningful benefits for players and clubs alike.

Even a DCU academy scout has admitted they have no say in determining which clubs become part of the P2P program, as these decisions are entirely managed by the business side of operations.

All the MLS Club Academies have the same P2P program.
Pretty much a standard carbon copy


https://www.nycfc.com/youth/affiliates

https://www.philadelphiaunion.com/club/youth-soccer-partners

https://www.newyorkredbulls.com/youth/academy/affiliate/

In theory, you’re absolutely right that the P2P program model for most MLS club academies follows a standard structure. However, clubs like DC United fail to provide real value to their affiliates beyond the occasional “ID sessions” and tickets to subpar games. Contrast this with programs like Union, NYCFC, and Red Bull, which offer significant benefits to their partners, such as access to advanced coaching resources, developmental support, and structured opportunities for players to grow beyond just the pathway-to-pro dream.

The issue in the DMV is the lack of a real, organized legislature pathway to pro. The infrastructure isn’t there, and the investment isn’t focused on actually helping players succeed. Without meaningful benefits or systems in place like those provided by Union or Red Bull, the dream of a pathway to pro in this area feels more like marketing hype than a legitimate opportunity.

Your opinion is noted for the record

All you need to know is that no player in the history of the P2P program at DCU, which was introduced 6 years ago, has ever become a pro at DCU. If you want to know how much of a marketing gimmick it is, there you go.

How old is MLS Next?

Which academies have sent affiliate p2p players to Professional ranks?

2020

Just off top of my head and in our own region, both Aaronson brothers, mcglynn, both Sullivan brothers at Union. Carrizo at nycfc. All in last six years.

There are more...

Paxten Aaronson was 12 years old at Philly

Which p2p club did he come from?

their dad OWNS Real New Jersey where they both started. Feeder for union.

Just read https://www.edpsoccer.com/post/real-jersey-fc-developing-and-preparing-players-for-the-next-level