like Merrick Garland?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.
I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.
She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.
So who would you like Trump to appoint?
Someone professional, ethical, and apolitical. Someone who isn’t interested in being on tv. Someone calm, thoughtful, and serious who takes public service and law and order seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.
I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.
She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.
So who would you like Trump to appoint?
Someone professional, ethical, and apolitical. Someone who isn’t interested in being on tv. Someone calm, thoughtful, and serious who takes public service and law and order seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.
I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.
She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.
So who would you like Trump to appoint?
Anonymous wrote:She was also part of the Guiliani Road Show about election fraud in 2020.
Anonymous wrote:She dropped the Trump University fraud case after he made a big donation to her campaign.
She’s qualified but corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.
I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.
She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.
Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.
I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.
Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.