Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s be honest, the federal government owns a lot of buildings. If they’re sitting empty because people aren’t coming in, why keep them? These buildings were likely purchased with the expectation that everyone would be working in person, 9 to 5. If that’s no longer the case, it makes sense to either have employees return to the office or sell off the buildings, shut them down, and reduce capacity to accommodate a remote workforce. After all, this is what companies do—why pay for empty or underutilized buildings if no one is using them?
GSA has been consolidating already for years, especially giving up leases (more are leased than you probably think). The newer GSA-owned ones are not designed to accommodate the entire population at once.
PP is a great example of people who think they have the answers, but have no actual information about what's already being done.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s be honest, the federal government owns a lot of buildings. If they’re sitting empty because people aren’t coming in, why keep them? These buildings were likely purchased with the expectation that everyone would be working in person, 9 to 5. If that’s no longer the case, it makes sense to either have employees return to the office or sell off the buildings, shut them down, and reduce capacity to accommodate a remote workforce. After all, this is what companies do—why pay for empty or underutilized buildings if no one is using them?
Anonymous wrote:This is not great for parents of young children who may not have much aftercare at their daycares. Our former daycare really cut back hours post COVID. We are lucky that our older kids can stay at their elementary school until 6:30pm, but this is not the case throughout DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know there are no answers but our office has hired quite a few remote workers. They actually make less because no DC locality pay. I wonder how they handle that.
I think the idea behind requiring RTO is that many people, including people who are hours away from a physical office, would quit and then not be replaced.
Ironically some of our best employees are remote. That would be a shame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one knows the answers to these questions.
However, Vivek has said he wants feds in the office 8-6 everyday and claims this can be done via EO. We shall see.
8-6 is illegal. Is Vivek a moron?
Many feds are FLSA exempt. Vivek can require whatever hours in-office that he wants.
literally no. a non-government entity cannot require anyone in the government to do anything at all.
Vivek can make a recommendation to Trump, who can implement it by executive order immediately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one knows the answers to these questions.
However, Vivek has said he wants feds in the office 8-6 everyday and claims this can be done via EO. We shall see.
8-6 is illegal. Is Vivek a moron?
Many feds are FLSA exempt. Vivek can require whatever hours in-office that he wants.
literally no. a non-government entity cannot require anyone in the government to do anything at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one knows the answers to these questions.
However, Vivek has said he wants feds in the office 8-6 everyday and claims this can be done via EO. We shall see.
8-6 is illegal. Is Vivek a moron?
Many feds are FLSA exempt. Vivek can require whatever hours in-office that he wants.
Anonymous wrote:I could handle this for 6 months after January. But we’re moving to an office a fraction of our current one and the plan was to be in twice a week while a different coworker used my office the other 2 days of the week. The office space and furniture are already up with that scheme in mind. How are you gonna fit double the people in the same space?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RTO will work in one if two ways, depending on your agency:
1. For well respected, relatively noncontroversial independent agencies that get their budget from fees, etc, not much will change. SEC, OCC, FDIC, etc
2. For everyone else (and cfpb), things will be very bad.
You think a bunch of billionaires narcissists think the SEC is a respected, noncontroversial agency? You crazy, girl.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know there are no answers but our office has hired quite a few remote workers. They actually make less because no DC locality pay. I wonder how they handle that.
I think the idea behind requiring RTO is that many people, including people who are hours away from a physical office, would quit and then not be replaced.
Ironically some of our best employees are remote. That would be a shame.