Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
It is rude.
And entitled.
It’s not rude, what a strange take. The kid needs to learn, school isn’t interested in doing it, the OP found an option that was.
School isn’t meant to be a la carte. If OP feels that this school isn’t meeting her DD’s needs then she should look for a private school that will. It’s disruptive to teachers and the other students if students are coming and going.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
It is rude.
And entitled.
It’s not rude, what a strange take. The kid needs to learn, school isn’t interested in doing it, the OP found an option that was.
School isn’t meant to be a la carte. If OP feels that this school isn’t meeting her DD’s needs then she should look for a private school that will. It’s disruptive to teachers and the other students if students are coming and going.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
It is rude.
And entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
It is rude.
And entitled.
It’s not rude, what a strange take. The kid needs to learn, school isn’t interested in doing it, the OP found an option that was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
It is rude.
And entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
It is rude.
And entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
This was in direct response to a poster saying it was rude. Its not rude to take your kid out of school for any particular reason. Definitely not rude for enrichment. Its weird to think you owe the school all 6.4 hours of the day or whatever because of manners... that's not something OP should consider when making this decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
That’s not the point anyone is arguing. Are you being obtuse
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not ok. It’s rude.
Nah. School is service for your child. Its rude of them to not meet her needs. Its not rude to say this service isnt fully adequate so ive found others
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be better to be the first car in the car rider line? I always see 2 cars who are waiting in line 2 hours before school even dismisses. I thought it was really weird but maybe they have the same situation as your DD. Our school dismisses students 5 mins early to pack up etc. so they come out right on time or a minute earlier.
Anonymous wrote:DD tested into a math enrichment class 15 minutes away. Unfortunately, the only available class meets 15 minutes after the last school bell (and you know it takes time to be dismissed and get to the car). I don't want her to be 5-10 minutes late every single class. Do you think it would be unreasonable for me to pick DD up 10 minutes early every Monday afternoon? The issue is that it's a fairly large school (400 kids) and the pre-K program lets out 15-30 minutes before the upper grades, so it is kind of a hectic time in the school lot. My other question is whether all these count as unexcused early release (10 minutes a week through the rest of the year). What do you think? I have no idea if this is a non-issue or an unreasonable thing to ask of the school.
