Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would he make this goofy video with all the current chiefs if he was about to fire them?
The video was pointless without saying the plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems more like he's doing a partial reorg. Several of these are new position titles.
Chief Equity and Development Officer
Chief Student Support Officer
Chief Academic Officer
Chief Operations Officer
Chief Technology Officer
General Counsel
Sorry, plus two more:
Chief Talent Management Officer
Chief School Leadership Officer
I like how he just said that the budget is unsustainable and 90% of it is personnel and then he decides to hire more overhead Chiefs and their subs.
Not to mention he notes hiring more experienced staff which means higher salaries. So is he planning to hire less experienced staff for Special Education or pay the less. An area where it’s already hard to hire.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salaries of these positions are way too high in my opinion. I know MCPS started paying all these folks like this under Dr. McKnight but the experience and responsibilities needed to do these jobs does not require people paid this much.
+1 agree
So what would you set their salary at then? Keep in mind that at a certain point Teachers and Principals are making 6figures.
IMO, a teacher's job is a lot harder than an administrator's job.
I'm not a teacher, but even I know that an admin job is a lot easier and cushy than a teacher's job. Maybe those admins should teach for a year to get a sense of how their policies are really impacting teachers and kids.
You don't pay based on how "hard" a job is to perform- you pay based on how hard it is to fill with a qualified candidate.
Given the state of MCPS, I'd say they haven't been hiring qualified candidates.
They should go teach for a year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salaries of these positions are way too high in my opinion. I know MCPS started paying all these folks like this under Dr. McKnight but the experience and responsibilities needed to do these jobs does not require people paid this much.
+1 agree
So what would you set their salary at then? Keep in mind that at a certain point Teachers and Principals are making 6figures.
IMO, a teacher's job is a lot harder than an administrator's job.
I'm not a teacher, but even I know that an admin job is a lot easier and cushy than a teacher's job. Maybe those admins should teach for a year to get a sense of how their policies are really impacting teachers and kids.
You don't pay based on how "hard" a job is to perform- you pay based on how hard it is to fill with a qualified candidate.
This! And how difficult a job is often person dependent. There a plenty of teachers who will tell you they’d never want to be an admin and have to deal with the things they do.
please. Who wouldn't want an office job where you can work remotely and get pad six figures. That's the kind of job I have. I don't have to deal with screaming kids all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems more like he's doing a partial reorg. Several of these are new position titles.
Chief Equity and Development Officer
Chief Student Support Officer
Chief Academic Officer
Chief Operations Officer
Chief Technology Officer
General Counsel
Sorry, plus two more:
Chief Talent Management Officer
Chief School Leadership Officer
I like how he just said that the budget is unsustainable and 90% of it is personnel and then he decides to hire more overhead Chiefs and their subs.
No, it's a reorg, and they have to apply.
It's one way to save money. Private companies do it all the time. Went through it with a FAANG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salaries of these positions are way too high in my opinion. I know MCPS started paying all these folks like this under Dr. McKnight but the experience and responsibilities needed to do these jobs does not require people paid this much.
+1 agree
So what would you set their salary at then? Keep in mind that at a certain point Teachers and Principals are making 6figures.
IMO, a teacher's job is a lot harder than an administrator's job.
I'm not a teacher, but even I know that an admin job is a lot easier and cushy than a teacher's job. Maybe those admins should teach for a year to get a sense of how their policies are really impacting teachers and kids.
You don't pay based on how "hard" a job is to perform- you pay based on how hard it is to fill with a qualified candidate.
This! And how difficult a job is often person dependent. There a plenty of teachers who will tell you they’d never want to be an admin and have to deal with the things they do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They probably all quit after seeing who won the BoE seats. They don't want to go down with MCEA's ship.
Good riddance. These would be all the bums that were hired by Lazy Jack and Monifa.
They'll take a job in Howard County.
Anonymous wrote:They probably all quit after seeing who won the BoE seats. They don't want to go down with MCEA's ship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salaries of these positions are way too high in my opinion. I know MCPS started paying all these folks like this under Dr. McKnight but the experience and responsibilities needed to do these jobs does not require people paid this much.
+1 agree
So what would you set their salary at then? Keep in mind that at a certain point Teachers and Principals are making 6figures.
IMO, a teacher's job is a lot harder than an administrator's job.
I'm not a teacher, but even I know that an admin job is a lot easier and cushy than a teacher's job. Maybe those admins should teach for a year to get a sense of how their policies are really impacting teachers and kids.
You don't pay based on how "hard" a job is to perform- you pay based on how hard it is to fill with a qualified candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salaries of these positions are way too high in my opinion. I know MCPS started paying all these folks like this under Dr. McKnight but the experience and responsibilities needed to do these jobs does not require people paid this much.
+1 agree
So what would you set their salary at then? Keep in mind that at a certain point Teachers and Principals are making 6figures.
IMO, a teacher's job is a lot harder than an administrator's job.
I'm not a teacher, but even I know that an admin job is a lot easier and cushy than a teacher's job. Maybe those admins should teach for a year to get a sense of how their policies are really impacting teachers and kids.
You don't pay based on how "hard" a job is to perform- you pay based on how hard it is to fill with a qualified candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They probably all quit after seeing who won the BoE seats. They don't want to go down with MCEA's ship.
Good riddance. These would be all the bums that were hired by Lazy Jack and Monifa.
Anonymous wrote:They probably all quit after seeing who won the BoE seats. They don't want to go down with MCEA's ship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salaries of these positions are way too high in my opinion. I know MCPS started paying all these folks like this under Dr. McKnight but the experience and responsibilities needed to do these jobs does not require people paid this much.
+1 agree
So what would you set their salary at then? Keep in mind that at a certain point Teachers and Principals are making 6figures.
IMO, a teacher's job is a lot harder than an administrator's job.
I'm not a teacher, but even I know that an admin job is a lot easier and cushy than a teacher's job. Maybe those admins should teach for a year to get a sense of how their policies are really impacting teachers and kids.