Anonymous wrote:What I don't understand is how a school like Navy can exist where there are several AAP classes but only like 10 of the kids come from Crossfield. Are 70% of the kids at Navy really testing that high?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, there's no way to determine which LLIV students were committee-placed unless the school administrators, parent, or student disclose it. Whether it's a base or center school, their internal decisions are unpredictable, and they'll have to figure out how to manage their school accordingly.
Centers can't principal place. That's the big drawback for kids zoned to centers- it's committee or bust because there are no mixed classrooms either
Anonymous wrote:How are they disadvantaged? Not all level iii kids are in a level iv classroom at a school with a local program either. Now if they weren’t getting level iii services, that would be a different story.
Anonymous wrote:It’s just annoying bc why have a center at that point. We took the leap to attend the center and commute quite a ways due to being told that centers have classes with all liv students, which would’ve been a stronger peer group than local, which moved to cluster model.
Not arguing with what you are saying philosophically… but if we are giving all liii students the chance to be in liv class, what is even the point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school is a center with 4 classes.
There is 1 fully level IV class with all the transfer kids and some base kids
There is 1 blended level IV/level III class with base kids only (about 50/50 split per teacher)
2 gen ed classes
I'm confused about this. How can there be a class at a center school containing both level IV and level III kids? I thought at the center school the level IV kids were always separated into their own classroom. Maybe that's not true?
It sounds like there are Centers that allow for Principal placement while others do not. It wouldn't be FCPS if schools didn't pick and choose what part of policies they want to enforce. Honestly, I have no problem with Centers allowing for Principal placement, it really isn't fair to kids at the base school that they are not given that chance. If there is space in the LIV class then allow LIII kids into that class.
Anonymous wrote:Well, there's no way to determine which LLIV students were committee-placed unless the school administrators, parent, or student disclose it. Whether it's a base or center school, their internal decisions are unpredictable, and they'll have to figure out how to manage their school accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school is a center with 4 classes.
There is 1 fully level IV class with all the transfer kids and some base kids
There is 1 blended level IV/level III class with base kids only (about 50/50 split per teacher)
2 gen ed classes
I'm confused about this. How can there be a class at a center school containing both level IV and level III kids? I thought at the center school the level IV kids were always separated into their own classroom. Maybe that's not true?
It sounds like there are Centers that allow for Principal placement while others do not. It wouldn't be FCPS if schools didn't pick and choose what part of policies they want to enforce. Honestly, I have no problem with Centers allowing for Principal placement, it really isn't fair to kids at the base school that they are not given that chance. If there is space in the LIV class then allow LIII kids into that class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school is a center with 4 classes.
There is 1 fully level IV class with all the transfer kids and some base kids
There is 1 blended level IV/level III class with base kids only (about 50/50 split per teacher)
2 gen ed classes
I'm confused about this. How can there be a class at a center school containing both level IV and level III kids? I thought at the center school the level IV kids were always separated into their own classroom. Maybe that's not true?