Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did you teach them about opposite sex relationships? Then.
+1
“You can marry whoever you love. Some girls marry boys, and some girls marry girls.”
Marriage was created by God to join a woman and a man together in a holy covenant with God.
In our country, and in many other countries, men can choose to marry men and women can choose to marry women. It might be confusing that it’s called the same thing. But that’s because there are rights that the government gives to “married” couples—and same-sex couples wanted those rights too. And that makes sense. In 2015, the Supreme Court agreed that this was fair, so now couples who are not/boy or girk/girl can be joined together in marriage too. It isn’t the same as Biblical marriage, because it doesn’t require a covenant with God. But it’s still the fair law and the fair thing to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What age do you start discussing opposite sex relationships? Age 6mon? "Oh look at little timmy, he's such a flirt with little larla!"
There should be no issue discussing same sex relationships from a very early age.
That's not what anyone is talking about. Where did you even come up with this?
DP here but it's because people sexualize babies from the jump (daddy's gonna need a gun! mommy's little heartbreaker!) but god forbid someone mentions anything gay to a kid and all hell breaks loose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did you teach them about opposite sex relationships? Then.
+1
“You can marry whoever you love. Some girls marry boys, and some girls marry girls.”
Marriage was created by God to join a woman and a man together in a holy covenant with God.
In our country, and in many other countries, men can choose to marry men and women can choose to marry women. It might be confusing that it’s called the same thing. But that’s because there are rights that the government gives to “married” couples—and same-sex couples wanted those rights too. And that makes sense. In 2015, the Supreme Court agreed that this was fair, so now couples who are not/boy or girk/girl can be joined together in marriage too. It isn’t the same as Biblical marriage, because it doesn’t require a covenant with God. But it’s still the fair law and the fair thing to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From birth… love is love and families come in all shapes and sizes
How in 2024 is this a question?!?
“Sorry Larla you’re not old enough to learn why they love each other”….what?!!
Not everyone agrees with you on this. As you well know.
What's to "agree with "? It's a fact of life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did you teach them about opposite sex relationships? Then.
+1
“You can marry whoever you love. Some girls marry boys, and some girls marry girls.”
Marriage was created by God to join a woman and a man together in a holy covenant with God.
In our country, and in many other countries, men can choose to marry men and women can choose to marry women. It might be confusing that it’s called the same thing. But that’s because there are rights that the government gives to “married” couples—and same-sex couples wanted those rights too. And that makes sense. In 2015, the Supreme Court agreed that this was fair, so now couples who are not/boy or girk/girl can be joined together in marriage too. It isn’t the same as Biblical marriage, because it doesn’t require a covenant with God. But it’s still the fair law and the fair thing to do.
Which God are you referring to? Because there are approximately 4k recognized religions globally and I guarantee they don’t all teach this marriage is between a man and woman thing. It’s frankly narcissistic to me when someone pushes their religion as the “right one” and all the 3,999 religions are the wrong one. It is their special, chosen God who makes the rules for humanity. 🙄
The reality is marriage is a legal concept. A man and a woman in a relationship are not married just because they are a man and a woman. They are married specifically because they got a piece of paper from the court declaring them married.
If you want to teach well in X religion the God we believe in thinks only men and women should marry then go ahead and teach your kid to be a backwater bigot. But you’re factually wrong that marriage was created by God when it is a legal designation made by Governments. The IRS has more involvement with what a marriage is than your 1 out 4,000 chance you picked (or were conveniently born into) worshipping the “correct” God.
Anonymous wrote:We have always explained since the time they were in preschool that families can have 2 moms, 2 dads, 1 mom or Dad, etc. We have a gay relative with a partner and had friends in preschool with same gender parents. My son was the ring bearer in a same gender wedding at the age of 3. So that fact is not controversial.
However, I don’t think it’s appropriate for schools to discuss or read books about kids having feelings for the same gender. This was a big controversy in MoCo due to the new diversity curriculum which introduced a book to 3rd graders with a kid having a crush on her classmate. This is wildly inappropriate in my opinion and I disagreed heavily with how teachers were instructed to teach it and answer questions. That is not the role of schools. Kids don’t have the maturity or knowledge to understand this in 3rd grade without it pushing an agenda. It suggests that sexuality is a choice rather than something that happens chemically and biologically to some people in utero. I know some will flame me for this view but I strongly believe that a school should not discuss or teach about a CHILD’s interest in the same gender until middle school when there is a frame of reference to puberty and reproduction.
When the curriculum was introduced, all of the elementary school principals wrote a letter objecting to this book but had no problem with a book that referred to a gay uncle’s wedding.
Anonymous wrote:Trying to gauge what the norm is if/when this is taught in a school setting. And if you are teaching it at home, then what’s the appropriate age?
Anonymous wrote:We have always explained since the time they were in preschool that families can have 2 moms, 2 dads, 1 mom or Dad, etc. We have a gay relative with a partner and had friends in preschool with same gender parents. My son was the ring bearer in a same gender wedding at the age of 3. So that fact is not controversial.
However, I don’t think it’s appropriate for schools to discuss or read books about kids having feelings for the same gender. This was a big controversy in MoCo due to the new diversity curriculum which introduced a book to 3rd graders with a kid having a crush on her classmate. This is wildly inappropriate in my opinion and I disagreed heavily with how teachers were instructed to teach it and answer questions. That is not the role of schools. Kids don’t have the maturity or knowledge to understand this in 3rd grade without it pushing an agenda. It suggests that sexuality is a choice rather than something that happens chemically and biologically to some people in utero. I know some will flame me for this view but I strongly believe that a school should not discuss or teach about a CHILD’s interest in the same gender until middle school when there is a frame of reference to puberty and reproduction.
When the curriculum was introduced, all of the elementary school principals wrote a letter objecting to this book but had no problem with a book that referred to a gay uncle’s wedding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did you teach them about opposite sex relationships? Then.
+1
“You can marry whoever you love. Some girls marry boys, and some girls marry girls.”
Marriage was created by God to join a woman and a man together in a holy covenant with God.
In our country, and in many other countries, men can choose to marry men and women can choose to marry women. It might be confusing that it’s called the same thing. But that’s because there are rights that the government gives to “married” couples—and same-sex couples wanted those rights too. And that makes sense. In 2015, the Supreme Court agreed that this was fair, so now couples who are not/boy or girk/girl can be joined together in marriage too. It isn’t the same as Biblical marriage, because it doesn’t require a covenant with God. But it’s still the fair law and the fair thing to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From birth… love is love and families come in all shapes and sizes
How in 2024 is this a question?!?
“Sorry Larla you’re not old enough to learn why they love each other”….what?!!
Not everyone agrees with you on this. As you well know.
What's to "agree with "? It's a fact of life.